ANALYSIS OF STAD AND JIGSAW COOPERATIVE LEARNING : A RECOMMENDATION FOR CLASSROOM PRACTICES

Sri Rumiyatiningsih Luwiti, Muzdalifah Mahmud, Fadlia Panigoro

Abstract


Cooperative learning, especially through Jigsaw and STAD methods, is widely employed to enhance student engagement and academic achievement. This research reviews the effectiveness of implementing Jigsaw and STAD cooperative learning in high school English classrooms in Indonesia. The qualitative approach involves library research, analyzing 40 studies spanning 2013 to the present. Findings indicate that both strategies can be applied to all English skills, with STAD more suited for receptive skills and Jigsaw for productive skills. The flexibility of these strategies allows adaptation to diverse student conditions, learning topics, and objectives. Theoretical benefits include insights into implementing these cooperative learning models, aligning with government initiatives like MBKM and the Merdeka curriculum. Practical benefits include guiding educators and researchers in utilizing these strategies effectively. The research underscores the need for proper application and favorable conditions, emphasizing the importance of resources and educator oversight in cooperative learning success.

Keywords


Cooperative learning, Jigsaw strategy, STAD strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends (2008). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa.

Aronson, E. (2016). The Jigsaw classroom. Sage Publications.

David and Roger Johnson (1994) .An Overview of Cooperative Learning

Isjoni (2007, page 15) Cooperative Learning Methods: Students Working Together in Four-Member Teams to Master Material Initially Presented by the Teacher.

Johnson and Johnson (1990) .Cooperative learning can improve students' academic achievement and social skills.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.

Ling (2016) .Exploring the Benefits of Cooperative Learning as a Student-Centered Approach in the Classroom.

Moore (2009) .The Effects of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) on Student Mathematics Achievement : A Meta-Analysis.

Nesbit, et al (1997. Page,5)The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis.

Retno Hestiningsih (2015) .Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif dengan Metode Numbered Head Together pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Bangil.

Rusman (2010) .The Effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Learning Model to Improve Learning Outcomes and Social Skills of Elementary School Students.

Slavin, (1986, page.18) .Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI).

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education Digest, 81(3), 16-20.

Suhadi, (2010.page,7) .The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Model in Achieving Academic Goals, Acceptance of Diversity, and Developing Social Skills among Students.

Suryadi (2016) .Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Kabupaten Purbalingga.

T. Prasetyo (2021) .Pembelajaran yang Berpusat pada siswa untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jbsb.v13i3.24615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Dipublikasikan oleh:

p-ISSN: 2088-6020 dan e-ISSN: 2776-5733

Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia,  Fakultas Sastra dan Budaya, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Jl. Prof. Dr. Ing. B.J. Habibie, Desa Moutong, Kec. Tilongkabila, Kab. Bone Bolango Telepon (0435) 821125  Fax. (0435) 821752, email: jurnalbdb@gmail.com | http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JBSP/

 

 

Indexed by: