The Legal Position Of The Will Given To The Adopted Child As Proof Of Ownership In The Gorontalo Religious Court

Meriyani Hinelo

Abstract


Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the  Juridical Analysis of Religious Court Decision  Number: 403/PDT. G/2019/PA. Gtlo Concerning  the Determination of Probate Disputes  and the Legal Position of  the Will as proof of rights in the judgment of the Judge. Research Uses this type of normative-empirical research. Using several approaches, namely:the legal approach(statue approach),  the case approach  (case approach). The results of this study show that:  First,  that based on  juridical analysis of religious court decision  number: 403/PDT. G/2019/PA. Gtlo About  the Determination of Will Disputes has been in line with the provisions of the event law, where the first condition that must be met by the plaintiff is regarding material conditions, while the plaintiff in his lawsuit is wrong in occupying defendant 1 and defendant 2  (two). Second,  that the legal position of the Will as proof of rights in the judge's consideration is not used as a balance material by pa judges because there are   defects as intended by the researcher, therefore  the judge ruled the lawsuit is  unacceptable(Niet Onvantkelijke Verklaard)  ) which means that the case has not been completed with a positive verdict in the sense that it has not touched the subject matter and if the plaintiff wants to re-apply must complete the terms of the formil in question

Keywords: Position; Will; Dispute

Keywords


Position; Will; Dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book:

Anisitus Amanat, 2001, Membagi Warisan Berdasarkan Pasal-Pasal Hukum Perdata BW, Penerbit: PT RajaGrafindo Persada Jakarta.

Al-Alaby, M. M. (2021). Analisis Terhadap Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia No. 29 Tahun 2002 Tentang Wakaf Uang (Telaah Wakaf Saham).

Nur Mohamad Kasim, Jurnal: Studi Komparatif Waris Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.

Salim HS, 2011, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW), Penerbit: Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Journal:

Ahmad, A., & Nggilu, N. M. (2020). Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(4).

Al-Alaby, M. M. (2021). Analisis Terhadap Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia No. 29 Tahun 2002 Tentang Wakaf Uang (Telaah Wakaf Saham).

Anita Kamilah dan M. Rendy Aridhayandi, “Kajian terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Warisan Atas Tanah Akibat tidak Dilaksanakannya Wasiat oleh Ahli Waris Dihubungkan dengan Buku II Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tentang Benda (Van Zaken)” : Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, Vol. 32, No. 1, Februari 2015

Fanny Levia & Erni Agustin, Hasil Penelitian atas Tanggung Gugat Notaris dalam Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Wasiat secara Online, dalam jurnal hokum ARENA HUKUM Volume 10, Nomor 1, April 2017.

Hayati, N. (2014). Kajian Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Notaris dalam Menjalankan Jabatan Terkait Ketiadaan Sanksi Pidana pada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lex Jurnalica, 11(1).

Junus, N., & Mamu, K. Z. (2019). Kebijakan penataan dan pengaturan kawasan danau (arrangement and regulation of lake area policy). Jurnal Yuridis Vol, 6(2).

Lay, J. (2019). Kedudukan Surat Wasiat (Testament) Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Yang Sah Menurut Pasal 875 Kuhperdata. Lex Privatum, 7(3).

Thalib, M. C. (2020). Refleksi Perlindungan Hak Anak Butuh Kasih di Kota Gorontalo. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1).

Wantu, Fence M., and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. "Constitutional Dialogue In Judicial Review At The Indonesian Constitutional Court: The Future Prospects." Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 25 (2022): 1-8.

Wantu, Fence M., Novendri M. Nggilu, and Mellisa Towadi. "Indonesian Constitutional Interpretation: Constitutional Court Versus The People's Consultative Assembly." Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24.6 (2021): 1-11.

Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran. "Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries." Jurnal Legalitas 14.2 (2021): 85-106.

Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran. "Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries." Jurnal Legalitas 14.2 (2021): 85-106.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v1i3.13288

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Estudiante Law Journal:
 
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044; +62-822-9329-6045 (SMS/WA)
E-mail: estudiante02lawjournal@gmail.com 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.