A Juridical Review Of The Shooting On The Spot Conducted By The Police Against The Perpetrator Criminal Act Of Theft

Malik Abdillah Dahil

Abstract


This research presents an overview of how juridical reviews of shooting in the place conducted by the police against perpetrators of criminal theft and the obstacles faced by the police in shooting in the place against criminals. This type of research uses normative research methods with the help of empirical data. In this case, the researcher combines elements of normative law which are then supported by the addition of data or empirical elements.

The results of this study show that the actions taken by the police against the alleged perpetrators of motorcycle theft are not discretionary but pure criminal acts such as serious crimes of persecution that result in death or murder if the police investigators perform actions that are not following operational standards of procedure in the use of power with firearms or have exercised discretionary authority that goes beyond the limit of authority (abuse of power). The factors that are the constraints of the police in shooting in the place of the perpetrators of crime are the level of public crowds, the distance of the shooting with the perpetrator, weather conditions.

Keywords: Shoot On The Spot, Police, Theft.


Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Book:

Al-Banjary Syaefurrahim. 2005. “Hitam Putih Polisi Dalam Mengungkap Jaringan Narkoba”. Jakarta: Restu Agung

Husin Kadri & Budi Rizki Husin. 2016 . “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia”. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.

Sitompul DPM. 1985. “Hukum Kepolisian Di Indonesia (Suatu Bunga Rampai). Bandung: Tarsito

Witanto Darmoko Yuti & Arya Saputra Negara Kutawaringin. 2013. “Diskresi Hakim Sebuah Instrumen Menengakkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Perkara Pidana”. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Journal article:

Ahmad, Ahmad, and Novendri M. Nggilu. "Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution." Jurnal Konstitusi 16.4 (2020): 785-808.

Sasmita Rangga, penerpan asas praduga tak bersalah dalam praktek penanganan tindak pidana pencurian.Jurnal Law Reform;april 2011 vol.6 No 1.

Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran. "Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries." Jurnal Legalitas 14.2 (2021): 85-106.

Sinaga Irfan Yobel Halomoan. 2017. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tembak Ditempat Oleh Pihak Kepolisian Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah”. Jom Fakultas Hukum. Vol. Iv Nomor 1.

Ahmad, Ahmad. "Purifikasi Pemberian Amnesti Dan Abolisi: Suatu Ikhtiar Penyempurnaan Undang Undang Dasar 1945." Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 5.2 (2021).

Thesis:

Skripsi Zahrati Fadhilah Taufiq. 2018. “Tindak Pidana Kealpaan Atas Diskresi Aparat Kepolisian. Uin Syarif Hidayatullah

Legal Product:

Pasal 8 Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penggunaan Kekuatan Dalam Tindakan Kepolisian




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v1i3.13406

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Estudiante Law Journal:
 
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044; +62-822-9329-6045 (SMS/WA)
E-mail: estudiante02lawjournal@gmail.com 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

        

slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor