Differences In the Imposition of Corruption Criminal Sanctions
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out whether or not the District Court's decision in decision No. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto and No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto and the factors behind the differences in the imposition of sanctions in the two cases. The research method is normative research. Research resultverdict no. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto the three pieces of evidence which were one of the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence on the defendant. The fact of the trial was that the defendant had been legally proven to have committed a crime that was detrimental to the state so through the two conditions for imposing a sentence, the judge's conviction was built that the defendant was the perpetrator so that the decision was appropriate as a criminal responsibility committed by the defendant. Verdict No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto because no evidence was found in the form of letters and witness statements which could prove that the defendant had committed a crime. The fact of the trial formed the judge's belief that the defendant was not proven to have committed a crime and the defendant must be acquitted of all lawsuits.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Referensi
Buku
Hartanti, Evi. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Lisnawaty W. Badu dan Suwitno Y. Imran. Hukum Dan HAM. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2021.
Surachmin. Strategi Dan Teknik Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Journal:
Ahmad dan Novendri M. Nggilu Fakultas, “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian.” Jurnal Konstitusi. 16, No. 4 (2019): 785–808., 791
Badu, Lisnawaty. “Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Legalitas 5, no. 1 (2012).
Devy Ch, Rumambi. “Rumambi, Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Lex et Societatis 2, no. 7 (2014).
Dian Ekawaty Ismail and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson, “Criminology Analysis of Women’s as Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Crimes,” Jambura Law Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 57–76., 58
Guslan, Odi Faiz. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Batasan Antara Perbuatan Maladministrasi Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2018).
Hidayah, Astika Nurul. “Analisis Aspek Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pendidikan Anti Korupsi.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 18, no. 2 (2018).
Jufryanto Puluhulawa, Mellisa Towadi, and Vifi Swarianata, “Perlindungan Hukum Situs Bawah Air Leato / Japanese Cargo Wreck The Legal Protection of The Leato Underwater Site” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum 24. No. 2 (2020): 189–208., 197
ulius Mandjo, “The Right to Obtain Free Assistance and Legal Protection for The Indigent People Through Legal Assistance Organizations.” Jambura Law Review. 3, No. 02 (2021): 365–77., 375
Kasim, Nur M. “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Inovasi 5, no. 1 (2008).
Kurnia Siwi, “Pembaruan Hukum Pedoman Terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal IJLC 2, no. 2 (2022).
Mustandar. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidan Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Of Lex Generalis 2, no. 2 (2021).
Mellisa Towadi and Nur Mohamad Kasim, “An Indication of China ’ s Policy towards Uighurs and Its Implications by International Law Aspects.” Jambura Law Review. 3, No. 01 (2021): 55–71., 69
Lisnawaty Badu, “Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia,” Jurnal Legalitas 5, no. 1 (2012).
Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, “Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum.” Jambura Law Review. 1, No. 1 (2019): 68-93., 73
Novendri M. Nggilu, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Gorontalo,” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal. 5, No. 2 (2020): 109–121., 110
Putri. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 10/Pid-Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI.” Jurnal Ikamkum 2 (1AD).
Ramdan Kasim, “Dehumanisasi Pada Penerapan Hukum Pidana Secara Berlebihan (Overspanning van Het Straftrecht),” Jambura Law Review. 2, No. 1 (2020): 1–29., 3
Siwi, Kurnia. “Pembaruan Hukum Pedoman Terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal IJLC 2, no. 2 (2022).
Putusan
Putusan No. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto.
Putusan Nomor 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18348
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.png)
