Differences In the Imposition of Corruption Criminal Sanctions

Siti Hardiyanti Abas

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18348

Differences In the Imposition of Corruption Criminal Sanctions

Siti Hardiyanti Abas

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out whether or not the District Court's decision in decision No. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto and No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto and the factors behind the differences in the imposition of sanctions in the two cases. The research method is normative research. Research resultverdict no. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto the three pieces of evidence which were one of the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence on the defendant. The fact of the trial was that the defendant had been legally proven to have committed a crime that was detrimental to the state so through the two conditions for imposing a sentence, the judge's conviction was built that the defendant was the perpetrator so that the decision was appropriate as a criminal responsibility committed by the defendant. Verdict No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto because no evidence was found in the form of letters and witness statements which could prove that the defendant had committed a crime. The fact of the trial formed the judge's belief that the defendant was not proven to have committed a crime and the defendant must be acquitted of all lawsuits.

Keywords

Corruption, Differences in the Imposition of Criminal Sanctions;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Referensi

Buku

Hartanti, Evi. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Lisnawaty W. Badu dan Suwitno Y. Imran. Hukum Dan HAM. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2021.

Surachmin. Strategi Dan Teknik Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Journal:

Ahmad dan Novendri M. Nggilu Fakultas, “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian.” Jurnal Konstitusi. 16, No. 4 (2019): 785–808., 791

Badu, Lisnawaty. “Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Legalitas 5, no. 1 (2012).

Devy Ch, Rumambi. “Rumambi, Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Lex et Societatis 2, no. 7 (2014).

Dian Ekawaty Ismail and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson, “Criminology Analysis of Women’s as Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Crimes,” Jambura Law Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 57–76., 58

Guslan, Odi Faiz. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Batasan Antara Perbuatan Maladministrasi Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2018).

Hidayah, Astika Nurul. “Analisis Aspek Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pendidikan Anti Korupsi.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 18, no. 2 (2018).

Jufryanto Puluhulawa, Mellisa Towadi, and Vifi Swarianata, “Perlindungan Hukum Situs Bawah Air Leato / Japanese Cargo Wreck The Legal Protection of The Leato Underwater Site” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum 24. No. 2 (2020): 189–208., 197

ulius Mandjo, “The Right to Obtain Free Assistance and Legal Protection for The Indigent People Through Legal Assistance Organizations.” Jambura Law Review. 3, No. 02 (2021): 365–77., 375

Kasim, Nur M. “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Inovasi 5, no. 1 (2008).

Kurnia Siwi, “Pembaruan Hukum Pedoman Terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal IJLC 2, no. 2 (2022).

Mustandar. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidan Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Of Lex Generalis 2, no. 2 (2021).

Mellisa Towadi and Nur Mohamad Kasim, “An Indication of China ’ s Policy towards Uighurs and Its Implications by International Law Aspects.” Jambura Law Review. 3, No. 01 (2021): 55–71., 69

Lisnawaty Badu, “Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia,” Jurnal Legalitas 5, no. 1 (2012).

Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, “Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum.” Jambura Law Review. 1, No. 1 (2019): 68-93., 73

Novendri M. Nggilu, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Gorontalo,” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal. 5, No. 2 (2020): 109–121., 110

Putri. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 10/Pid-Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI.” Jurnal Ikamkum 2 (1AD).

Ramdan Kasim, “Dehumanisasi Pada Penerapan Hukum Pidana Secara Berlebihan (Overspanning van Het Straftrecht),” Jambura Law Review. 2, No. 1 (2020): 1–29., 3

Siwi, Kurnia. “Pembaruan Hukum Pedoman Terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal IJLC 2, no. 2 (2022).

Putusan

Putusan No. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto.

Putusan Nomor 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18348