Legal Considerations in the Disparity of the Judge's Decisions Have Fulfilled a Sense of Justice
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know and analyze aboutthe cause of the disparity in judge decisions that occurred in narcotics abuse cases with case number 94/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Gto and number 138/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Gto and to find out and analyze whether the sentence imposed by the judge In this disparity case, it is in accordance with justice or not with normative research methods using a case approach. The technique used is a systematic technique through literature study and using descriptive analysis techniques as a support.The results of the analysis in the resulting research are first in the disparity case number 94/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Gto and number 138/Pid.Sus/2019/PN. Gto there are factors that influence the judge's decision including legal factors, factors evidence, and individual historical factors or trial facts. The two criminal sentences carried out by the judge, in this case, are considered to be far from justice because the results of the judge's decision are far greater in the second case than the first due to several influencing factors
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Book :
Mappiasse, Syarif. Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta : Kencana, 2015.
Surachman, Andi Hamzah dan RM. Kejahatan Nakortika Dan Psikotropika. Jakarta Sinar Media, 1994.
Yati Nurhayati. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung Nusa Media, 2020.
Journal Article :
Fakultas, Ahmad dan Novendri M. Nggilu. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution of the Constitution Through the the Principle of the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi. 16, no. 4 (2019): 785–808.
Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson. “Criminology Analysis of Women’s as Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Crimes.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 1 (2021): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.10984.
Kasim, Ramdan. “Dehumanisasi Pada Penerapan Hukum Pidana Secara Berlebihan (Overspanning van Het Straftrecht).” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v2i1.2402.
Mandjo, Julius. “The Right to Obtain Free Assistance and Legal Protection for The Indigent People Through Legal Assistance Organizations.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 02 (2021): 365–77.
Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat. “Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum.” Jambura Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 68–93. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1988.
Nggilu, Novendri M. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENGATURAN SANKSI PIDANA DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI GORONTALO.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal. 5, no. 2 (2020): 109–21.
Puluhulawa, Jufryanto, Mellisa Towadi, and Vifi Swarianata. “Perlindungan Hukum Situs Bawah Air Leato / Japanese Cargo Wreck The Legal Protection of The Leato Underwater Site / Japanese Cargo Wreck Abstract Laut Mempunyai Makna Besar Bagi Indonesia , Sebagaimana Dijelaskan Shanti Dwi Kartika Bahwasannya : “ Laut Se.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum. 24, no. 2 (2020): 189–208.
Towadi, Mellisa, and Nur Mohamad Kasim. “An Indication of China ’ s Policy towards Uighurs and Its Implications by International Law Aspects.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 01 (2021): 55–71.
Winda Hartanto. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Narkotika Dan Obat Obatan Terlarang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 1 (2017).
Thesis :
Andirsman, Tri. “Hukum Pidana : Asas-Asas Dan Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Universitas Lampung, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v5i2.18486
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.png)
