Analysis of the Legal Strength of Using Closed Circuid Television in Proving Crimes of Theft

Ahmad Handika, Jufryanto Puluhulawa

Abstract


This research aims to determine the legal strength of the use of closed circuit television in proving criminal acts of theft. This research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach which is then formulated systematically so that it provides an overview and is processed by researchers using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of the research show that the use of CCTV (closed circuit television) recordings in general crimes as electronic evidence cannot be used as stand-alone evidence in the Criminal Procedure Code because the Criminal Procedure Law only recognizes five tools. evidence as contained in Article 184, added to the evidence using the Negatief Wettelijk theory of evidence where the judge may only pass judgment based on valid evidence by the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code for general crimes

Keywords


Legal force; Closed Circuid Television; Theft Crime

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

———. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Dikdik M. Arif Mansyur, and Elisatris Gultom. Cyber Law Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2005.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.

———. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Effendi T. Dasar Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana (Perkembangan Dan Pembaharuan Di Indonesia). Malang: Setara Press, 2014.

Fitri, Sheila Maulida. “Urgensi Pengaturan Alat Bukti Elektronik sebagai Upaya Mencapai Kepastian Hukum.†Amnesti Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (February 24, 2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v2i1.659.

Hanafi, Hanafi, and Reza Aditya Pamuji. “Urgensi Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.†Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 11, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 81. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v11i1.2020.

Hanafi, Hanafi, and Muhammad Syahrial Fitri. “Implikasi Yuridis Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Perkara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016.†Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 1 (February 6, 2020): 101. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v12i1.2639.

Heniyatun, Heniyatun, Bambang Tjatur Iswanto, and Puji Sulistyaningsih. “Kajian Yuridis Pembuktian dengan Informasi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan.†Varia Justicia 14, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 30–39. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v14i1.2047.

Heryogi, Arief, Masruchin Ruba’i, and Bambang Sugiri. “Fungsi Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016.†Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 1 (June 26, 2017): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i12017p007.

Isma, Nur Laili, and Arima Koyimatun. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Pada Dokumen Elektronik Serta Hasil Cetaknya Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana.†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 2 (July 2014): 109–16.

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana (Normatif, Teoretis, Praktik Dan Permasalahannya). Bandung: Alumni, 2012.

Lisnawati, Erma. “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Elektronik Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO.20/PUU-XVI/2016 Dalam Prespektif Criminal Justice System.†Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 5, no. 4 (May 31, 2017): 677. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i04.p04.

M. Yahya Harahap. PembahasanPermasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.

Makarim, Edmon. “Keautentikan Dokumen Publik Elektronik Dalam Administrasi Pemerintahan Dan Pelayanan Publik.†Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 45, no. 4 (December 21, 2015): 508. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol45.no4.60.

Manope, Indra Janli. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Surat Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana.†Lex Crimen 6, no. 2 (March 27, 2017): 107–13.

Moeljatno. Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Bogor: Politeia, 2001.

Nikolas Simanjuntak. Acara Pidana Indonesia Dalam Sirkus Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009.

Novid Rizqi Prayoga. “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung (Circumstantial Evidence) Sebagai Dasar Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana (Studi Putusan Nomor 777/PID.B/2016/PN.JKT.PST).†Rawijaya Law Student Journal, June 2020. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/3869.

Pramata, Aldho Galih. “Analisis Kekuatan Dan Nilai Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik Berwujud CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA.†Verstek 8, no. 3 (December 28, 2020): 392–400. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i3.47057.

Ramadhanti, Raden Fidela Raissa, Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, and Musyahadah Rahmah. “The Position Of CCTV Recording As A Tool Of Evidence In The Trial Of Theft At Minimarket (Judicial Review of Decision Number: 284/Pid.B/2019/PN Sbr).†Soedirman Law Review 3, no. 1 (n.d.): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2021.3.1.120.

Ramiyanto, Nfn. “Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana / Electronic Evidence As An Admissible Evidence In Criminal Law.†Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (November 29, 2017): 463. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.463-486.

Ratna Nurul Afiah. Barang Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1989.

Riadi Asra Rahmad. Hukum Acara Pidana. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.

Rusyadi, I. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana.†Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 5, no. 2 (February 13, 2016): 128–34. https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v5i2.558.

Saputra, Ardiansyah Rolindo. “Penggunaan CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Pada Satreskrim Polres Sawahlunto).†UNES Law Review 2, no. 3 (July 1, 2020): 321–30. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v2i3.125.

Suratman, and Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

Zakariya, Rizki, Yogi Prastia, and Siti Ismaya. “Revitalisasi Pengaturan Penanganan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Proses Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Legislatif 3, no. 1 (Desember 2019): 134–50. https://doi.org/10.20956/jl.v3i1.10211.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v1i1.24187

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Estudiante Law Journal has been indexed by:

Garuda GS Crossref Microsoft Academic
Dimension EuroPub Copernicus International Standard Serial Number
International Scientific Indexing Base ResearchBib scilit
orcid ESJIndex citefactor citefactor
ss citefactor

 

Estudiante Law Journal has been available at:

Harvard usask cornel leiden
ss cornel Sheffield NUN
ss Sheffield UB UB
ss UB UB UB

 

Â