Email the author 
Analisis Capaian Fisika Dasar Mahasiswa Teknik Geologi: Perspektif Beban Kognitif, Penalaran Spasial, dan Gender dalam Pembelajaran Geosains
Abstract
Introductory Physics plays a fundamental role in Geological Engineering education, as it supports the modeling of dynamic and multidimensional Earth system phenomena. Nevertheless, the course is often perceived as challenging due to the complex integration of conceptual understanding, mathematical reasoning, and multiple representations. This study aims to analyze patterns of academic achievement in Introductory Physics among Geological Engineering students and to explore potential gender-based differences. A descriptive quantitative design with an exploratory comparative approach was employed involving 24 students enrolled in the 2025/2026 academic year. Data were derived from Midterm Examination scores covering quantities and measurement, kinematics, dynamics, and work–energy. Descriptive analysis revealed a moderate level of overall achievement (63.1%) with substantial variability across students. Dynamics and Work–Energy emerged as the most challenging topics compared to quantities and measurement. These findings are associated with high intrinsic cognitive load and substantial spatial reasoning demands required in these domains. Comparative analysis indicated a statistically significant gender difference (p < 0.05) with a large effect size, although the finding remains context-specific. The results underscore the need for strengthened representational scaffolding, improved conceptual integration of energy principles, and explicit spatial reasoning support in Introductory Physics curricula for geoscience education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisyah, O. N., & Sudarti, S. (2021). Analisis kemampuan multirepresentasi verbal dan gambar pada mahasiswa pendidikan fisika dalam memahami konsep reaksi inti matahari. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika, 3(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31540/sjpif.v3i1.1136
Bouchée, T., de Putter - Smits, L., Thurlings, M., & Pepin, B. (2022). Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579
Burkholder, E., & Salehi, S. (2022). Exploring the pre-instruction gender gap in physics. Plos One, 17(7), e0271184.
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022). Gender differences in students’ self-efficacy in introductory physics courses in which women outnumber men predict their grade. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 20142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020142
Degen, D., Caviedes Voullième, D., Buiter, S., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Vereecken, H., González-Nicolás, A., & Wellmann, F. (2023). Perspectives of physics-based machine learning strategies for geoscientific applications governed by partial differential equations. Geoscientific Model Development, 16(24), 7375–7409. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023
DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0039-y
Dew, M., Perry, J., Ford, L., Bassichis, W., & Erukhimova, T. (2021). Gendered performance differences in introductory physics: A study from a large land-grant university. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010106
Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2023). The impact of multiple representations on students’ understanding of vector field concepts: Implementation of simulations and sketching activities into lecture-based recitations in undergraduate physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012787
Ishikawa, T., & Newcombe, N. S. (2021). Why spatial is special in education, learning, and everyday activities. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00274-5
Klyce, A., & Ryker, K. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial training for introductory geology students. Geosphere, 20(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02663.1
Le, V., Nissen, J. M., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Mehrabi, A., Morphew, J. W., Chang, H. H., & Van Dusen, B. (2025a). Applying cognitive diagnostic models to mechanics concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 10103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010103
Le, V., Nissen, J. M., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Mehrabi, A., Morphew, J. W., Chang, H. H., & Van Dusen, B. (2025b). Applying cognitive diagnostic models to mechanics concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 10103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010103
Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314
Martínez-Huerta, H., Chavarría-Garza, W. X., Aquines-Gutiérrez, O., & Santos-Guevara, A. (2024). Exploring the Gender Gap: Motivation, Procrastination, Environment, and Academic Performance in an Introductory Physics Course in a Human-Centered Private University in Northeast Mexico—A Case Study. Education Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020186
McLaughlin, J. A., & Bailey, J. M. (2023). Students need more practice with spatial thinking in geoscience education: a systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 147–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2029305
McNeal, P. M., & Petcovic, H. L. (2020). Spatial thinking and fluid Earth science education research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768007
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Nasution, A. O., Fany, A., Susilo, A. R. R., Nazha, M. D., & Lubis, A. S. (2025). Tinjauan Pemahaman Konsep Kinematika Dan Dinamika Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(7), 4734–4742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i7.8276
Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive Load Theory: Emerging Trends and Innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040458
Setyowati, D., Qadar, R., & Efwinda, S. (2022). Analisis motivasi siswa berdasarkan model ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) dalam pembelajaran fisika berbasis e-learning di SMA se-Samarinda. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i2.1044
Suseno, N. (2014). Pemetaan analogi pada konsep abstrak fisika. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) FKIP UM Metro, 2(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v2i2.118
Syafaruddin, S., Dewi, I. N., & Utami, S. D. (2022). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Berdasarkan Gender Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbasis Kolaboratif Sainstifik. Panthera: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains Dan Terapan, 2(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36312/pjipst.v2i3.39
Taqwa, M. R. A., Shodiqin, M. I., & Zainuddin, A. (2020). Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Memahami Konsep Gaya Dan Gerak. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.86
Tong, D., Wu, H., Ren, H., Wang, Z., Pan, S., & Bao, L. (2025). Promoting knowledge integration in work and mechanical energy through conceptual framework and cooperative learning instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 10163. https://doi.org/10.1103/lj4w-wsqb
Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Chapter Four - Spatial Thinking and STEM Education: When, Why, and How? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 147–181). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
Wati, W. (2024). Pemetaan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Fisika pada Konsep Energi, Kinematika, dan Listrik Statis dengan Tes Disnogtik Four-Tier. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 4(4), 808–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i4.984
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/geojpg.v4i2.37439
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 I Made Hermanto, Moch. Rio Pambudi, Ni Luh Sri Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Geosfera : Jurnal Penelitian Geografi: (P-ISSN: 2962-5424, E-ISSN: 2962-5416) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.