Classification of Evidence-Based Practices Learning Strategies in Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Random Forest
Abstract
Selecting Evidence-Based Practices learning strategies for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder requires careful consideration of children’s diverse ability profiles. This study developed a classification model for Evidence-Based Practices learning strategies using the Random Forest algorithm based on a primary dataset consisting of 106 records. The features used include child age, gender, verbal ability, Autism Spectrum Disorder severity level, learning media, and language learning difficulties. The classification target consists of four classes: ABA, Visual Method, PECS, and Speech Therapy. Model evaluation was conducted using an 80:20 hold-out split, Stratified 5-Fold Cross Validation, Repeated Stratified Cross Validation, ablation test, and feature importance analysis. In the 80:20 hold-out scenario, Random Forest achieved an accuracy of 45.45% and an F1-Macro score of 0.4393. In Stratified 5-Fold Cross Validation, the model obtained an average accuracy of 38.61% ± 7.17% and an F1-Macro score of 0.3803 ± 0.0736. The repeated cross-validation results showed an average accuracy of 34.45% ± 9.46% and an F1-Macro score of 0.3332 ± 0.0967. These findings indicate that Random Forest is able to form an initial classification model; however, its performance remains low to moderate. The limitations of this study lie in the limited dataset size, the relatively small number of samples per class, and the absence of external validation; therefore, the model cannot yet be used as a final recommendation system. This study is positioned as a preliminary study to support the development of a Decision Support System for selecting Evidence-Based Practices learning strategies for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
K. Hume et al., “Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism: Third Generation Review,” J. Autism Dev. Disord., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 4013–4032, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2.
C. Lord et al., “The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism,” Lancet, vol. 399, no. 10321, pp. 271–334, 2022, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01541-5.
M. Gitimoghaddam, N. Chichkine, L. McArthur, S. S. Sangha, and V. Symington, Applied Behavior Analysis in Children and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Scoping Review, vol. 45, no. 3. Springer International Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00338-x.
N. Cavus et al., “A systematic literature review on the application of machine-learning models in behavioral assessment of autism spectrum disorder,” J. Pers. Med., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jpm11040299.
Z. T. Zoana, M. W. Shafeen, N. Akter, and T. Rahman, “Application of Machine Learning in Identification of Best Teaching Method for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder,” no. October, pp. 6–7, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05035
M. Garonga and R. Tanduk, “Perbandingan Algoritma Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, dan Random Forest Dalam Klasifikasi Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1507–1514, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.6.1020
S. S. Rajagopalan, Y. Zhang, A. Yahia, and K. Tammimies, “Machine Learning Prediction of Autism Spectrum Disorder from a Minimal Set of Medical and Background Information,” JAMA Netw. Open, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29229.
I. Walsh et al., “DOME: recommendations for supervised machine learning validation in biology,” Nat. Methods, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1122–1127, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01205-4.
I. Hameed et al., BASED-XAI: Breaking Ablation Studies Down for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05566
R. Larracy, A. Phinyomark, and E. Scheme, “Machine Learning Model Validation for Early Stage Studies with Small Sample Sizes,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS, vol. 2021-Janua, pp. 2314–2319, 2021, doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629697.
D. Rajput, W. J. Wang, and C. C. Chen, “Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9.
A. Ichwani, R. I. Kesuma, A. Setiawan, and I. E. Wicaksono, “Preventing Data Leakage in Classification via Integrated Machine Learning Pipelines : Preprocessing , Feature Transformation , and Hyperparameter Tuning,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 391–410, 2026.
O. Rainio, J. Teuho, and R. Klén, “Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x.
A. Tharwat, “Classification assessment methods,” Appl. Comput. Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168–192, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003.
K. M. Sujon, R. Hassan, K. Choi, and M. A. Samad, “Accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, or MCC? empirical evidence from advanced statistics, ML, and XAI for evaluating business predictive models,” J. Big Data, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40537-025-01313-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjeee.v8i2.39495
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by:
Electrical Engineering Department
Faculty of Engineering
State University of Gorontalo
Jalan B.J.Habibie Desa Moutong Kecamatan Tilongkabila Kabupaten Bone Bolango
Telp. 0435-821175; 081340032063
Email: [email protected]/[email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















