Model ETAS Spatio-Temporal pada Analisis Pemetaan Intensitas Kegempaan di Wilayah Sumatera

Andreas Rony Wijaya

doi:10.34312/jjom.v5i1.17359

Model ETAS Spatio-Temporal pada Analisis Pemetaan Intensitas Kegempaan di Wilayah Sumatera

Andreas Rony Wijaya

Abstract

High seismic activity forces Indonesia to mitigate natural disasters to minimize the impact of these disasters. One of the mitigation efforts that can be done is to know the possibility of an earthquake occurring in an area. Earthquakes, which are random phenomena, cannot be determined with certainty. Therefore, studies in seismological statistics can be used. One of the studies in seismological statistics that discusses the occurrence of earthquakes is the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. This model describes the main seismic activity followed by aftershocks. The ETAS model, which only considers the parameters of time and event magnitude, was developed into a Spatio-temporal ETAS model, which also describes spatial parameters or locations. This study used the Spatio-temporal ETAS model to analyze the Sumatra region’s seismic activity from 2000-2022. Earthquake data sources are obtained from the United State Geological Survey (USGS). Based on data analysis, the Spatio-temporal ETAS model expressed in terms of the conditional intensity function shows that earthquakes that occur in the Sumatera region with a large magnitude tend to produce a large conditional intensity function as well. The spatial component of the spatio-temporal ETAS model can be explained by mapping the peak ground acceleration (PGA). The results of the PGA mapping show that seismic activity in the Sumatera region is prone to occur along the north and west coasts of the Sumatra region, with PGA values ranging from 0.2 g to 0.9 g. The larger the PGA value means, the higher the risk of an earthquake occurring in the area marked with a reddish-yellow dot or contour.

Keywords

Mitigation; Earthquakes; Spatio-temporal ETAS Model; Conditional Intensity Function

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. M. Haifani, “Manajemen Resiko Bencana Gempa Bumi Yogyakarta 27 Mei 2006,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional IV SDM Teknilogi Nuklir, 2008, pp. 285–294.

R. Metrikasari and A. Choiruddin, “Pemodelan Risiko Gempa Bumi di Pulau Sumatera Menggunakan Model Inhomogeneous Neyman-Scott Cox Process,” Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–107, feb 2021, doi: 10.12962/j23373520.v9i2.52318.

D. Siska, “Pentingnya Analisa Rupture/Rekahan Gempa Bumi sebagai Pedoman dalam Perencanaan Perumahan dan Pemukiman,” Jurnal Arsitekno, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 39–46, feb 2019, doi: 10.29103/arj.v3i3.1221.

N. B. Wibowo and J. N. Sembri, “Analysis of Seismicity and Earthquake Energy at Opak Oyo Fault - Yogyakarta,” Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 82–90, oct 2017, doi: 10.13057/ijap.v7i2.13702.

Y. M. Kartikasari and A. Choiruddin, “Analisis Risiko Gempabumi di Sumatera dengan Cauchy Cluster Process,” Inferensi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–134, sep 2022, doi: 10.12962/j27213862.v5i2.12307.

R. Indri, H. Taunaumang, and F. R. Tumimomor, “Analisis Bahaya Gempa Bumi Menggunakan Metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis di Wilayah Likupang, Minahasa Utara,” Jurnal Fista Fisika dan Terapannya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2022.

A. R. Wijaya and H. Pratiwi, “Model Proses Titik Bertanda Terindeks Waktu Pada Data Gempa Bumi Di Pantai Selatan Jawa,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Aplikasinya, 2017, pp. 203–209.

Y. Ogata, “Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 83, no. 401, pp. 9–27, mar 1988, doi: 10.2307/2288914.

F. P. Schoenberg, “Introduction to Point Processes,” in Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., feb 2011, doi: 10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0425.

D. Harte, “PtProcess : An R Package for Modelling Marked Point Processes Indexed by Time,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 119–114, 2010, doi: 10.18637/jss.v035.i08.

N. Davoudi, H. R. Tavakoli, M. Zare, and A. Jalilian, “Declustering of Iran earthquake catalog (1983–2017) using the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model,” Acta Geophysica, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1359–1373, dec 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11600-018-0211-5.

L. S. Rini, H. Pratiwi, and S. B. Wiyono, “Penerapan Model epidemic type aftershock sequence (ETAS) pada Data Gempa Bumi di Sumatra,” in Proceeding 6th University Research Colloquium 2017: Seri MIPA dan Kesehatan, 2017, pp. 281–286.

USGS (United States Geological Survei), Sumatera Earthquakes Catalog. [Online]. Available: www.usgs.gov, 2022.

Y. Ogata, “Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 379–402, jun 1998, doi: 10.1023/A:1003403601725.

M. A. Rahman and D. R. T. Basarudin, “Algoritme Paralel Quasi Newton untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Optimasi Nonlinear tak Berkendala Skala Besar,” in Lokakarya Komputasi dalam Sains dan Teknologi Nuklit VI, 1987, pp. 71–82.

A. Jalilian, “ETAS : An R Package for Fitting the Space-Time ETAS Model to Earthquake Data,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 88, no. Code Snippet 1, pp. 1–39, 2019, doi: 10.18637/jss.v088.c01.

A. Jalilian and J. Zhuang, ETAS: Modeling Earthquake Data Using ETAS Model. [Online]. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ETAS, 2019.

D. H. Natawidjaja and W. Triyoso, “The Sumatran Fault Zone-from Source to Hazard,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 21–47, mar 2007, doi: 10.1142/S1793431107000031.

M. A. Massinai, K. R. Amaliah, L. Lantu, V. Virman, and M. F. I. M, “Analisis Percepatam Tanah Maksimum, Percepatan Tanah Maksimum, dan MMI di Wilayah Sulawesi Utara,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2016 UNJ. Pendidikan Fisika dan Fisika FMIPA UNJ, 2016, pp. SNF2016–EPA–33–SNF2016–EPA–36, doi: 10.21009/0305020407.

S. Pailoplee, “Relationship between Modified Mercalli Intensity and peak ground acceleration in Myanmar,” Natural Science, vol. 04, no. 08, pp. 624–630, 2012, doi: 10.4236/ns.2012.428082.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jjom.v5i1.17359