The Expected-Based Method of Value-at-Risk Prediction
Abstract
Value-at-Risk (VaR) remains a fundamental risk measure in financial risk management, providing an indicator for managing capital allocation and avoiding worst-case risk scenarios. Traditionally its defined as a quantile of the loss distribution. However, its computation depends critically on the existence and tractability of the inverse cumulative distribution function (CDF), which may not be available in closed form for complex or empirical distributions. This paper proposes an expectation-based simulation framework for VaR estimation that avoids explicit inversion of the CDF. The method approximates VaR by taking the expectation of order statistics from repeated sampling, effectively constructing a variance-reduced Monte Carlo estimator of the quantile. We provide a rigorous theoretical foundation for the proposed approach, including strong consistency, asymptotic normality, and a bias–variance decomposition. In particular, we show that the estimator achieves variance reduction proportional to the number of simulations while remaining consistent with the classical definition of VaR. Furthermore, under heavy-tailed distributions, the method demonstrates enhanced stability compared to traditional historical simulation, which is known to exhibit high tail variability. Extensive simulation studies confirm the theoretical findings, showing significant improvements in mean squared error and backtesting performance. Overall, the proposed framework provides a flexible alternative for VaR estimation in settings where conventional inversion-based methods are infeasible or unreliable.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
J. M. Reuters, “RiskMetrics—Technical Document,” Technical Report, JP Morgan–Reuters, 1996.
E. Wipplinger, “Philippe Jorion: Value at Risk—The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk,” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 397, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11408-007-0057-3.
I. Driga, “The New Basel Capital Accord—An International Convergence of Capital Measurements and Capital Standards in Banking,” Annals of the University of Petrosani Economics, vol. 7, pp. 129–135, 2007.
Š. Kraujalis, E. Karpavičiene, and A. Cvilikas, “The Specifics of Operational Risk Assessment Methodology Recommended by Basel II,” Engineering Economics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 18–27, 2006, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.48.3.11361.
G. A. Holton, Value-at-Risk: Theory & Practice. Academic Press, 2003.
D. Duffie, J. Pan, et al., “An Overview of Value at Risk,” Journal of Derivatives, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 7–49, 1997, doi: 10.3905/jod.1997.407971.
P. Embrechts, “Quantitative Risk Management,” in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, 2011, pp. 1151–1154.
J. Hull, Risk Management and Financial Institutions + Web Site. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, vol. 733.
G. Mentel, “Parametric or Non-Parametric Estimation of Value-at-Risk,” International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 103, 2013, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n11p103.
A. Toma and S. Dedu, “Quantitative Techniques for Financial Risk Assessment: A Comparative Approach Using Different Risk Measures and Estimation Methods,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 8, pp. 712–719, 2014, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00149-X.
T. S. Beder, “VaR: Seductive but Dangerous,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 12–24, 1995, doi: 10.2469/faj.v51.n5.1932.
K. Kuester, S. Mittnik, and M. S. Paolella, “Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies,” Journal of Financial Econometrics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–89, 2006, doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbj002.
M. Pritsker, “The Hidden Dangers of Historical Simulation,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 561–582, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.013.
P. García-Risueño, “Historical Simulation Systematically Underestimates the Expected Shortfall,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 34, 2025, doi: 10.3390/jrfm18010034.
C.-M. Kuan, J.-H. Yeh, and Y.-C. Hsu, “Assessing Value at Risk with CARE, the Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 261–270, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.002.
P. Kabaila and K. Syuhada, “The Asymptotic Efficiency of Improved Prediction Intervals,” Statistics & Probability Letters, vol. 80, nos. 17–18, pp. 1348–1353, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2010.04.016.
F. Zhang, Y. Xu, and C. Fan, “Nonparametric Inference of Expectile-Based Value-at-Risk for Financial Time Series with Application to Risk Assessment,” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 90, p. 102852, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102852.
F. Zhang and Y. Tu, “Threshold Expectile Regressions with an Unknown Threshold for Dependent Data,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 815–836, 2025, doi: 10.1111/obes.12655.
K. Syuhada, A. Hakim, and R. Nur’aini, “The Expected-Based Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Using Quantile and Expectile with Application to Electricity Market Data,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 3104–3121, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03610918.2021.1928191.
S. A. Klugman, H. H. Panjer, and G. E. Willmot, Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, vol. 715.
A. Yasser, A. Daouia, B. Nemouchi, and G. C. Stupfler, “Tail Expectile-VaR Estimation in the Semiparametric Generalized Pareto Model,” Working Paper, 2025, HAL ID: hal-04787798v1.
H. A. David and H. N. Nagaraja, Order Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
A. J. McNeil, R. Frey, and P. Embrechts, Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools—Revised Edition. Princeton University Press, 2015.
P. Embrechts, C. Klüppelberg, and T. Mikosch, Modelling Extremal Events: For Insurance and Finance. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, vol. 33, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2.
R. V. Hogg, J. W. McKean, A. T. Craig, et al., Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Pearson Education India, 2013.
M. C. S. Wong, W. Y. Cheng, and C. Y. P. Wong, “Market Risk Management of Banks: Implications from the Accuracy of Value-at-Risk Forecasts,” Journal of Forecasting, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2003, doi: 10.1002/for.842.
P. F. Christoffersen, “Evaluating Interval Forecasts,” International Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 841–862, 1998, doi: 10.2307/2527341.
W. F. Rosenberger, N. Flournoy, and S. D. Durham, “Asymptotic Normality of Maximum Likelihood Estimators from Multiparameter Response-Driven Designs,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00120-6.
S. Volgushev and X. Shao, “A General Approach to the Joint Asymptotic Analysis of Statistics from Sub-Samples,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 390–431, 2014, doi: 10.1214/14-EJS888.
T. Aktaran-Kalaycı, C. Alexopoulos, N. T. Argon, D. Goldsman, and J. R. Wilson, “Exact Expected Values of Variance Estimators for Simulation,” Naval Research Logistics (NRL), vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 397–410, 2007, doi: 10.1002/nav.20215.
R. Y. Rubinstein and D. P. Kroese, Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. John Wiley & Sons, 2016, doi: 10.1002/9781118631980.
C. A. Beschle and A. Barth, “Quasi-Continuous Level Monte Carlo for Random Elliptic PDEs,” in International Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. Springer, 2022, pp. 3–31, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-59762-6_1.
P. Embrechts, “Quantitative Risk Management,” in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, 2025, pp. 2050–2054.
S. Y. Novak, Extreme Value Methods with Applications to Finance, ser. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 122. 2011, p. 22, doi: 10.1201/b11537.
P. H. Kupiec, et al., “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models,” The Journal of Derivatives, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–84, 1995, doi: 10.3905/jod.1995.407942.
S. D. Campbell, “A Review of Backtesting and Backtesting Procedures,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, vol. 21, 2005, doi: 10.17016/FEDS.2005.21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjom.v8i2.37273
Copyright (c) 2026 Jacob Stevy Seleky, Lina Cahyadi Cahyadi, Sausan Ramadhani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jambura Journal of Mathematics has been indexed by
Jambura Journal of Mathematics (e-ISSN: 2656-1344) by Department of Mathematics Universitas Negeri Gorontalo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS.
Editorial Office
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Prof. Dr. Ing. B. J. Habibie, Moutong, Tilongkabila, Kabupaten Bone Bolango, Gorontalo, Indonesia
Email: [email protected].


















