Restorative Justice Approach in the Termination of Prosecution: A Conceptual Study and Practical Implementation

Gustab Mustofa Botutihe

Abstract


This study aims to examine and analyze case resolution through prosecution termination based on the Attorney General’s Regulation No. 15 of 2020, as implemented by District Prosecutor’s Offices. Employing a juridical-normative legal research method, the study utilizes a statute approach and a case approach to provide a comprehensive analysis. The findings reveal that the Attorney General’s Regulation No. 15 of 2020 on Prosecution Termination through Restorative Justice reflects the Attorney General's delegated authority, enabling prosecutors across Indonesia to prioritize restorative justice as an extension of the dominus litis principle. This regulation is designed to promote justice that benefits society by emphasizing the conscience of public prosecutors in resolving cases. It fosters legal enforcement that ensures legal certainty, order, justice, and truth, in line with religious, ethical, and moral norms. Furthermore, it obligates prosecutors to uncover and incorporate humanistic, legal, and societal justice values. The study highlights the urgency of this regulation as a progressive legal framework addressing the societal demand for more equitable and human-centered justice mechanisms. It contributes to the discourse on prosecutorial discretion by proposing restorative justice as a transformative approach that balances societal interests and individual accountability, marking a significant shift in Indonesia’s legal system. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and academics into the practical application of restorative justice principles, reinforcing its relevance in achieving sustainable and community-focused legal outcomes.

Keywords


Restoratif Justice; Prosecution Termination; Prosecutorial Discretion.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afif, Muhammad. “Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Terhadap Kasus Carok Akibat Sengketa Tanah Dalam Masyaraka Madura.” Soumatera Law Review 1, no. 2 (October 31, 2018): 298–313. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i2.3714.

Amin, Fakhry. “Nilai Pancasila Dalam Metode Penemuan Hukum: Orientasi Dan Konstruksi Nilai Pancasila Dalam Rechtsvinding.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (December 30, 2023): 299–314. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i2.7655.

Firdaus, Aras. “Implementation of the Prosecution Process in the Criminal Justice System at the Attorney General’s Office.” Veteran Law Review 5, no. 2 (November 14, 2022): 162. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v5i2.4349.

Flora, Henny Saida. “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 3, no. 2 (October 25, 2018): 142–58. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.3.2.142-158.

Gunawan Hasibuan and Rodiyah Nurratih. “Restorative Justice Sebagai Penegakan Hukum Pidana Modern Dan Berkeadilan.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 5, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v5i1.495.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.

Nusa, Apriyanto. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Kaukuba Dipantara, 2016.

Rampadio, Hamdan. “Reconstruction of the Role From the Prosecutor Based on the Socio-Legal Approach.” Rechtsidee 10, no. 2 (December 27, 2022). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.792.

Setyowati, Dewi. “Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice Sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, no. 1 (June 27, 2020): 121–41. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.24689.

Setyowati, Sulis. “Efektivitas Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Untuk Mencapai Keadilan Restoratif Pada Sistim Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 1 (July 10, 2021): 87. https://doi.org/10.32493/SKD.v8i1.y2021.11687.

Suparni, Niniek. Penerapan Hukum Progresi Oleh Lembaga Kejaksaan. Jakarta: Miswar, 2013.

Suratman, and H. Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

Syufriadi, Yudhi, Nandang Sambas, and Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria. “The Concept of Restorative Justice as a Means of Legal Protection for Victims of Crime in Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Science And Human Research 05, no. 12 (December 31, 2022). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-99.

Thanzani, Andrian, M. Naufal Yannassandi, and Putri Wahyu Maulana. “Peran Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Jurnal Abdikarya: Jurnal Karya Pengabdian Dosen Dan Mahasiswa 5, no. 2 (September 16, 2022): 143–53. https://doi.org/10.30996/abdikarya.v5i2.7283.

Utami, Rahayu Sri. “Restorative Justice: A Comprehensive Shift Towards Victim-Perpetrator Reconciliation and Community Healing.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review 18, no. 3 (August 25, 2023). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v18i3.959.

Waluyo, Bambang. Desain Fungsi Kejaksaan Pada Restorative Justice. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56591/pilar.v4i1.11434

Copyright (c) 2024 Gustab Mustofa Botutihe

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor