Unraveling the Issue of Divorce Mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court

Adriani B. Halid

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v8i1.18154

Unraveling the Issue of Divorce Mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court

Adriani B. Halid

Abstract

The purpose of this author is to find out How Divorce In Gorontalo Religious Court is In Mediation Of Case Settlement. The type of writing used is the author of an Empirical Normative. Data collection techniques are carried out using interviews, observation, and literary techniques. Then the data is analyzed descriptively or provides an overview or exposure to the subject and object of the author as the result of the author’s done. The results of this author show that the effectiveness of mediation in resolving divorce cases in the Gorontalo class IA religious court has not been fully said to be effective, due to its legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and facilities factors, community factors, and cultural factors. Therefore, it can be concluded that the process of implementing mediation can be said to be effective while the results of the mediation carried out have not been effective. Then the factors that cause the many failures of mediation carried out by the Gorontalo Religious Court, namely factors in divorce cases, factors from litigants, factors from mediators, factors where mediation is carried out, and environmental factors.

Keywords

Settlement; Mediation; Divorce.

References

Abdullah, Rifai. Restorative Justice Dalam Mewujudkan Rasa Keadilan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Restu Agung, 2006.

Ahmad, Ahmad, and R. Mokodompit. “Mengonseptualisasi Prinsip Meaningful Participation Melalui Kerangka Demokrasi Deliberatif Jürgen Habermas: Analisis terhadap Putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2025): 113–136.

Ahmad, Ahmad, and K. Rivera. “Analysis of Legal Protection of Human Rights in the Context of State Administrative Law.” International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law (2026): 40–53.

Alhasni, Dolot. “Determinasi Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Atas Neighboring Right: Determination of the Legal Protection of Right-Holders To.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 65–82.

As’Adi, Edi. Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Perspektif Mediasi (ADR) di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.

Aswaty, Yulia, and Martha Eri Safira. “Efektivitas Mediasi dalam Penanganan Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Ponorogo.” Jurnal Antologi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 125–44. https://doi.org/10.21154/antologihukum.v1i1.247.

Bahutala, A. E., Fence M. Wantu, and Ahmad Ahmad. “The Contest of Judicial Rationality: An Examination of Judges' Considerations in PTUN Cases No. 21/G/2022/PTUN.GTO and 19/B/2023/PT.TUN.MDO.” Damhil Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2025): 54–69.

Deflaizar. Efektivitas Mediasi Perceraian Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Mediasi (Studi Pengadilan Agama Kelas IA Jambi). Master’s thesis, UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin, 2022.

Dungga, W. A., Ahmad Ahmad, K. A. K. Aboelazm, D. M. D. Mulyanti, and N. M. N. N. M. Nggilu. “Ensuring Justice in the Trend of Remote Working: Legal Challenges and Implications for Companies and Workers.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 14, no. 1 (2026): 201–227.

Echols, John M., and Hasan Shadily. Kamus Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

Fitriyani, N. Siregar. “Efektivitas Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Kemasyarakatan 18, no. 2 (2018).

Gassing, A. Qadir, and Citra Widyasari S. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Pinrang Kelas IB.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga (Qadauna) 1 (2020): 137–45.

Gobel, R. T. S., Ahmad Ahmad, and Y. Chami. “The Constitutional Court in the Vortex of Resonance of Political Power.” As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law 5, no. 2 (2025): 245–266.

Goopaster, Garry. Negosiasi dan Mediasi: Sebuah Pedoman Negosiasi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Negosiasi. Jakarta: Visi Media, 1993.

Haeratun, Haeratun, and Fatahullah Fatahullah. “Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama.” Batulis Civil Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 29. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.930.

Haika, Lilik Andaryuni, and Ratu. “Efektivitas PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dalam Menekan Angka Cerai di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Penelitian 10, no. 2 (2018): 95–116.

Interview with Burhanudin Mokodompit, Mediator Judge of the Gorontalo Religious Court, August 22, 2022.

Interview with Fikri Hi. Asnawi Amiruddin, Court Registrar of the Gorontalo Religious Court, August 22, 2022.

Interview with Indriyati Usman, Former Mediation Participant at the Gorontalo Religious Court, August 24, 2022.

Interview with Muh. Hamka Musa, Mediator Judge, August 19, 2022.

Interview with Sahrul Fahmi, Vice Chief Judge of the Gorontalo Religious Court, August 19, 2022.

Interview with Vonny Lihawa, Former Mediation Participant at the Gorontalo Religious Court, August 23, 2022.

Kadek Wijayato, Lusiana Margareth Tijow, and Fence M. Wantu. “Kedudukan Peraturan Desa dalam Sistem Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nasional.” Ius Civile 4, no. 2 (2020).

Mandjo, Julius T., and Suwitno Y. Imran. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 27 Ayat (2) Tentang Hak untuk Mendapatkan Pekerjaan dan Penghidupan yang Layak bagi Kemanusiaan.” Jurnal Majelis 8 (2020).

Nafisaadullah, Putri Nurul, and Husni Syawali. “Implementasi Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Bandung Kelas IA.” Law Studies 2, no. 1 (2022): 465–71.

Nggilu, Novendri M., Apripari V. O. P., Dian Ekawaty Ismail, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Restorative Justice in Victimless Crimes under the Criminal Procedure Code: Problematics and Solutions.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 17, no. 1 (2026): 144–160.

Novita, Ria Ayu, Agung Basuki Prasetyo, and Suparno. “Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1960 Tentang Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Pertanian (Tanah Kering) di Desa Beringin, Kecamatan Bayan, Kabupaten Purworejo.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1–12.

Nurul Husna. Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Melalui Mediasi di Polres Bener Meriah. Bachelor’s thesis, UIN Ar-Raniry Darussalam, 2018.

Radjak, S., Dian Ekawaty Ismail, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision on Election Campaigns at Educational Institutions from the Perspective of the Purpose of Law.” Estudiante Law Journal 7, no. 3 (2025): 890–905.

Rahmadi, Takdir. Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2010.

Rasyid, Usman, and Fence M. Wantu. “Redefinisi Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Konstitusi: Upaya Mengharmonisasikan Putusan Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia.” Jurnal Majelis 8 (2020).

Salim HS, and Erlies Septiana Nurbaini. Penerapan Teori Hukum Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.

Saputri, Rika. Implementasi Mediasi dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Krui Lampung Barat. Bachelor’s thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 2018.

Saragih, Rayani. “Implementasi Mediasi terhadap Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Simalungun.” Jurnal Somasi (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi) 1, no. 1 (2020): 104–15. https://doi.org/10.53695/js.v1i1.35.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Kegunaan Sosiologi Hukum Bagi Kalangan Hukum. 5th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1989.

Subekti, and Tjitrosudibio. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1985.

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2000.

Undang-Undang RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Bandung: Citra Umbara, 2015.

Usman, Rachmadi. Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Wantu, Fence M., Weny Almoravid Dunga, Yassine Chami, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Reconstructing Alternative Dispute Resolution for Land Disputes Based on Local Wisdom in the Coastal Area of Tomini Bay.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 7, no. 2 (2026): 863–902.

Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran. “Comparison of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach to the Model in Several Countries.” Jurnal Legalitas 14, no. 2 (2021): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11809.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v8i1.18154