Criminal Sanctions for Persecution Resulting in Serious Injury

Fandaria Putri Yasin; Fence M. Wantu

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185

Criminal Sanctions for Persecution Resulting in Serious Injury

Fandaria Putri Yasin, Fence M. Wantu

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze how to prove the verdict of a criminal offense that results in serious injury based on the title raised in this authorship. An author is a type of writer an Emperis law or a field writer. With a Case approach. The process of collecting data from regulations and other references related to the problem being studied. The results of this author show that the proof of the Determination of the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is said to be incorrect but if we refer to the court decision of the defendant/convicted person is proven to have committed a criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury, but is only sentenced to imprisonment for six (6) months. The judge’s role in determining the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is influenced by two counts, namely the judge's estimate that lawfully and convincingly committed the crime of persecution and the legal act used in the indictment article is more than Article 351 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of persecution resulting in serious injury.

Keywords

Consent; Criminal; Seriously Injured.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Book:

Andarisman, Tri. Hukum Pidana,Asas-Asas Dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2006.

Audah, Abdul Qadir. Ensiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam, Terj. Tim Tsalisah. Bogor: PT. Kharisma Ilmu, 2008.

Huda, Chirul. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2006.

Ilyas, Amir. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Mahakarya Rangkeng Offset Yogyakarta, 2012.

Moeljatno. Perbuatan Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina AKsara, 1983.

Poerdaminto. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2003.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

Widnyana, I Made. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Fikahati Aneska. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2010.

Journal Article:

Bakung, Dolot Alhasni dan Muhtar Mohamad Hidayat. “Determination of The Legal Protection of RightHolders to Neighboring Rights.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 67.

Julius T Mandjo dan Suwitno Y Imran. Implementasi UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 27 Ayat 2 Tentang Hak Untuk Mendapatkan Pekerjaan Dan Penghidupan Yang Layak Bagi Kemanusiaan. Majelis. Vol. Edisi 08 S. Jakarta: Jurnal Majelis Media Aspirasi Konstitusi, 2020.

Lamintang, P.A.F dan Theo Lamintang. Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, Dan Kesehatan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Mulyadi, Lilik. “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori Dan Praktik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Yuristia 2, no. 1 (2013): 1.

———. “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori Dan Praktik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Yuristia 2, no. 1 (2013): 4.

Wantu, Fence M. dan Usman Rasyid. “Redefinisi Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Konstitusi: Upaya Mengharmonisasikan Putusan Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia.” Jurnal Majelis, 2020, 35.

Wantu, Fence M. dkk. “Kedudukan Peraturan Desa Dalam Sistem Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Ius Civile 4, no. 2 (2020): 201.

Wijaya, Ahmad dan Nasran Nasran. “Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries.” Jurnal Legalitas 14, no. 2 (2021): 88.

Thesis:

Bachri, Nur Aisyah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak PIdana Penganiayaan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185