Deciphering the Causes of Dispute Settlement of the Crime of Threatening

Rusnita Mopili

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v5i1.19881

Deciphering the Causes of Dispute Settlement of the Crime of Threatening

Rusnita Mopili

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out what factors hindered the role of the police in solving criminal threats in the Bone Bolango Regency. The type of research used is empirical research, using data types consisting of primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques were carried out using interviews, observation, and documentation techniques. The results showed that the factors that hindered the police in disclosing the criminal act of threatening were internal factors consisting of the loss of evidence, then the absence of witnesses, and the difficulty in determining the suspect because the suspect had run away, then there were also external factors, namely the lack of public awareness.

Keywords

Role, Police, Threatening Crime

Full Text:

PDF

References

Book

Ekaputra, R. Tresna dalam Mohammad. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Edisi 2. Medan: USU PRESS, 2015.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta; PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2011.

R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Bogor: Politeia, 1995.

Surbakti, Sudaryono Natangsa. Hukum Pidana Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan KUHP Dan RUU KUHP. Jawa Tengah: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2017.

Journal Article

Fakultas, Ahmad dan Novendri M. Nggilu. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution of the Constitution Through the the Principle of the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi. 16, no. 4 (2019): 785–808.

Iriyanto Tiranda, Fenty Puluhulawa, Johan Yasin. “Konsep Ideal Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pungutan Liar Berdasarkan Asas Peradilan.” Jurnal Jambura Law Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 123.

Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, and Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar Sarson. “Criminology Analysis of Women’s as Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Crimes.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 1 (2021): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.10984.

Kasim, Ramdan. “Dehumanisasi Pada Penerapan Hukum Pidana Secara Berlebihan (Overspanning van Het Straftrecht).” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v2i1.2402.

Mandjo, Julius. “The Right to Obtain Free Assistance and Legal Protection for The Indigent People Through Legal Assistance Organizations.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 02 (2021): 365–77.

Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat. “Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum.” Jambura Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 68–93. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1988.

Nggilu, Novendri M. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENGATURAN SANKSI PIDANA DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI GORONTALO.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal. 5, no. 2 (2020): 109–21.

Puluhulawa, Jufryanto, Mellisa Towadi, and Vifi Swarianata. “Perlindungan Hukum Situs Bawah Air Leato / Japanese Cargo Wreck The Legal Protection of The Leato Underwater Site / Japanese Cargo Wreck Abstract Laut Mempunyai Makna Besar Bagi Indonesia , Sebagaimana Dijelaskan Shanti Dwi Kartika Bahwasannya : “ Laut Se.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum. 24, no. 2 (2020): 189–208.

Towadi, Mellisa, and Nur Mohamad Kasim. “An Indication of China ’ s Policy towards Uighurs and Its Implications by International Law Aspects.” Jambura Law Review. 3, no. 01 (2021): 55–71.

Thesis

Hamdan Tuna. “Peran Penyidik Dalam Mengungkap Peristiwa Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Ditinjau Dari Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 2015.

Website

Admin SMP. “Mengapa Interaksi Sosial Itu Penting?” kemdikbud, 2021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v5i1.19881