The Role of the State Administrative Court as a Control Mechanism Over Government Administration

Sandrawati Akuna

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31024

The Role of the State Administrative Court as a Control Mechanism Over Government Administration

Sandrawati Akuna

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a central role in upholding the rule of law and good governance by providing oversight of government administration. PTUN serves as a judicial institution authorized to resolve disputes between citizens or private legal entities and state administrative bodies or officials concerning state administrative decisions (KTUN). This study aims to analyze the role of PTUN in protecting citizens' rights and enforcing the principles of good governance. The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that although PTUN holds absolute competence in resolving administrative disputes, the effectiveness of its rulings still faces challenges, including government non-compliance with court decisions. Additionally, the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded PTUN’s authority, particularly in assessing the presence of abuse of power by state administrative officials. However, the implementation of this regulation still requires strengthening in terms of transparency and accountability. Therefore, enhancing PTUN’s institutional capacity is necessary to ensure legal certainty and justice for the public. In conclusion, PTUN plays a strategic role in maintaining the balance between governmental power and the protection of citizens’ rights, thereby fostering a more transparent, accountable, and just administrative system

Keywords

State Administrative Court; Government Administration; Good Governance; Abuse of Power; Legal Certainty.

References

Adepio, Muhammad Fadel, dan Muhammad Urifianto Ardhan. “PERAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENEGAKKAN PRINSIP KEPENTINGAN UMUM DALAM HUKUM ADMINISTRASI DI INDONESIA.” Action Research Literate 8, no. 5 (2024): 1–7.

Ahmad, Ahmad, dan Novendri M. Nggilu. Constitutional dialogue : menguatkan intraksi menekan dominasi (konvergensi terhadap pengujian norma di Mahkamah Konstitusi). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2023.

———. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019): 785–808. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1646.

Ahmad, Ahmad, Viorizza Suciani Putri, dan Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar. “Antara Otoritas dan Otonomi : Pertautan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Praktik Eksekusi Putusan PTUN: Perlindungan HAM dalam Eksekusi Upaya Paksa Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (1 September 2024): 392–412. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2133.

Ahmad, Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, dan Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Convergence of Constitutional Interpretation to the Test of Laws Through a Constitutional Dialogue Approach: Konvergensi Penafsiran Konstitusional Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Melalui Pendekatan Constitutional Dialogue.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (1 September 2023): 514–35. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2038.

Ahmad, Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, dan Novendri Mohamad Nggilu. Hukum Konstitusi: Menyongsong Fajar Perubahan Konstotusi Indonesia Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.

Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, dan Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Constitutional Dialogue in Judicial Review at the Indonesian Constitutional Court: The Future Prospects.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 25, no. 1S (15 November 2021). https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/constitutional-dialogue-in-judicial-review-at-the-indonesian-constitutional-court-the-future-prospects-13248.html.

Akbar, Muhammad Kamil. “PERAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK.” Dharmasisya 1, no. 1 (2020): 352–63.

Ananda, Lia Ana. “EKSISTENSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM BERPERAN MENGONTROL ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAH.” REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (10 Januari 2023): 179. https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v10i2.9382.

Atikah, Ika. Metode Penelitian Hukum. 1 ed. Sukabumi: Penerbit Haura, 2022.

Barhamudin, Barhamudin, dan Abuyazid Bustomi. “PERLUASAN KOMPETENSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Solusi 20, no. 1 (1 Januari 2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v20i1.525.

Hakim, Sholihul, Suwandoko, dan Rizza Arge Winanta. “Implikasi Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance 5, no. 2 (2021): 144–55.

Hendri, Bintang Muhamad, dan Ahmad Ahmad. “Studying the Steps of the General Election Commission in Responding to the Recommendations of the Election Supervisory Body.” Estudiante Law Journal 5, no. 2 (18 Juni 2023): 393–406. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v5i2.18726.

Hr, Ridwan, Despan Heryansyah, Shi., Mh., dan Dian Kus Pratiwi, Sh., Mh. “PERLUASAN KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 2 (Mei 2018): 339–58. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7.

Huroiroh, Ernawati, dan Vera Rimbawani Sushanty. “DISHARMONISASI KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Sosio Yustisia : Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial 2, no. 2 (2022): 50–76.

Illahi, Beni Kurnia, Abdhy Walid Siagian, Rozin Falih Alify, dan Syammakh Daffa Alghazali. “OPTIMALISASI KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PEMERINTAH (ONRECHTMATIGE OVERHEIDSDAAD).” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 6, no. 1 (2023): 35–46.

Indah, Oksilia Yulita, John Pieris, dan Wiwik S. Widiarty. “PERAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM DI INDONESIA.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 7, no. 1 (30 April 2024): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v7i1.4969.

Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi. “Kewenengan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Good Govdrnance.” DELICTA Law Review 1, no. 1 (2024): 53–66.

Kartini, Murtiningsih, dan Adi Kusyandi. “EKSISTENSI PTUN SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPADA WARGA NEGARA DARI SIKAP TINDAK ADMINISTRASI NEGARA.” Yustitia 7, no. 2 (8 November 2021): 236–48. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v7i2.144.

Kolopita, Kurnia Ningsih Kolopita, Erman I. Rahim, dan Ahmad Ahmad. “A Comparative Study Of The Implementation Of A Closed Proportional System In The Perspective Of A Country With A Presidential System.” Estudiante Law Journal 1, no. 1 (25 Februari 2024): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v1i1.24858.

Latif, Sri Winda, Lisnawaty w Badu, dan Ahmad Ahmad. “Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Oleh Aparat Desa Ditinjau Dari Aspek Pidana: (Putusan Pn Gorontalo Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn Gto).” Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 2 (8 Mei 2024): 135–55. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i2.236.

Madril, Oce, dan Jery Hasinanda. “PERKEMBANGAN KEDUDUKAN HUKUM (LEGAL STANDING) DALAM PENGUJIAN ADMINISTRATIF DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DAN UJI MATERI DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG.” Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2021): 951–70. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3296.

Malaka, Zuman, dan Abdullah Isa. “Organisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Peradilan di Indonesia.” TARUNALAW: Journal of Law and Syariah 1, no. 01 (27 Januari 2023): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i01.63.

Mangesti, Yovita Arie, Ahmad Ahmad, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Grenaldo Ginting, dan Rian Sacipto. “Term Limitation of Indonesian Parliamentarians Seen from Constitutionalism.” Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 11 (15 November 2024): e263. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v11i2.91104.

Maulidina, Bertha, Silvia Ratna Anzani, dan Vianna Novita Kristya. “PERAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA BERBASIS PRINSIP GOOD GOVERNANCE.” Yustisi 10, no. 1 (2023): 196–209.

Pulung Hudoprakoso. “Pemberlakuan Upaya Administrasi Sebagai Primum Remidium Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 1, no. 1 (1 Juni 2023): 178–97. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1747.

Putra, Hidayat Pratama. “CHALLENGES IN THE EXAMINATION OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 5, no. 1 (28 Februari 2022): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.512022.75-94.

Rasji, Michellena, dan Najma Syabila. “Optimalisasi Upaya Administratif Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 10, no. 24 (2024): 457–68. https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/9141.

Rasyid, Usman, Novendri Mohamad Nggilu, Fence Wantu, Julisa Aprilia Kaluku, dan Ahmad Ahmad. “Reformulation of the Authority of Judicial Commission: Safeguarding the Future of Indonesian Judicial Power.” Jambura Law Review 5, no. 2 (31 Juli 2023): 386–413. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i2.24239.

Ritonga, Joni Sandri, Cindi Aulia, Dea Zulfa Inayah, Mirna Syafitri Rahmadani, Muhammad Aldi Khoiri, Rizka Arifah, dan Sumantri Ritonga. “ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PEMECATAN ASN.” Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 4, no. 1 (2025): 267–81.

Samia, dan Arif Wibowo. “DAMPAK PERLUASAN KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAH.” AL-SULTHANIYAH 12, no. 2 (29 Agustus 2023): 74–84. https://doi.org/10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v12i2.1625.

Shalwa, Nirma, Shinta Mariam, dan Moh Imam Gusthomi. “UPAYA PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA UNTUK MELINDUNGI HAK PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN DALAM KEPUTUSAN ADMINISTRATIF.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 12 (2024): 74–82.

Suniaprily, Firstnandiar Glica Aini, Muhammad Aziz Zaelani, dan Erika Nur. “Analisa Hukum Administrasi Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Yang Dilakukuan Pejabat Ditinjau Dari Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara” 03 (2024).

Wahyudi, Andri. “POLITIK HUKUM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (TUN).” HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (28 Februari 2021): 143–52. https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i1.4923.

Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. “KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM KONTEKS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (31 Maret 2016): 135. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.135-154.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31024