Juridical Analysis of the Position of PTUN in Resolving State Administrative Disputes

Safitri Ali

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31026

Juridical Analysis of the Position of PTUN in Resolving State Administrative Disputes

Safitri Ali

Abstract

This study analyzes the position of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving state administrative disputes by highlighting its role, function, and authority in protecting citizens' rights. Using a normative juridical method, this research examines the legal basis, principles, and practices of PTUN in upholding the rule of law, including case studies to understand its legal implementation in court. The findings indicate that PTUN plays a crucial role in overseeing government actions to ensure compliance with the law and good governance principles, despite challenges related to independence, effectiveness, and public accessibility. Therefore, enhancing judicial capacity, simplifying procedures, and strengthening institutional independence are necessary for PTUN to function optimally. In conclusion, PTUN serves as a vital judicial control mechanism within Indonesia’s legal system, and strengthening this institution is essential to fostering a more transparent, accountable, and just government.

Keywords

PTUN; State Administrative Disputes; Dispute Resolution

References

Ahmad, Ahmad, and Novendri M. Nggilu. Constitutional Dialogue : Menguatkan Intraksi Menekan Dominasi (Konvergensi Terhadap Pengujian Norma Di Mahkamah Konstitusi). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2023.

———. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019): 785–808. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1646.

Ahmad, Ahmad, Viorizza Suciani Putri, and Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar. “Antara Otoritas dan Otonomi : Pertautan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Praktik Eksekusi Putusan PTUN: Perlindungan HAM dalam Eksekusi Upaya Paksa Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (September 1, 2024): 392–412. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2133.

Ahmad, Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Convergence of Constitutional Interpretation to the Test of Laws Through a Constitutional Dialogue Approach: Konvergensi Penafsiran Konstitusional Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Melalui Pendekatan Constitutional Dialogue.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (September 1, 2023): 514–35. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2038.

Ahmad, Fence M. Wantu, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Constitutional Dialogue in Judicial Review at the Indonesian Constitutional Court: The Future Prospects.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 25, no. 1S (November 15, 2021). https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/constitutional-dialogue-in-judicial-review-at-the-indonesian-constitutional-court-the-future-prospects-13248.html.

Chumairoh, Lisatul. “Analisis Yuridis Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Mengenai Fungsi Dismissal Proses Dalam Persidangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 339–52.

Fiqri, Ahlul. “Paradigm for the Application of the Dominus Litis Principle in the Indonesian State Administrative Court.” JUSTICES: Journal of Law 2, no. 4 (2023): 202–12.

Heriyanto, Bambang. “Tinjauan Yuridis Implementasi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, no. 2 (2021): 141–56.

HUTAGAOL, BR, and MANALSAL DEBORA. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Sengketa Kepegawaian Di Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Medan Sebagai Tingkat Pertama,” 2024. https://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/10702.

Latif, Sri Winda, Lisnawaty w Badu, and Ahmad Ahmad. “Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Oleh Aparat Desa Ditinjau Dari Aspek Pidana: (Putusan Pn Gorontalo Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn Gto).” Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 2 (May 8, 2024): 135–55. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i2.236.

Mangesti, Yovita Arie, Ahmad Ahmad, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Grenaldo Ginting, and Rian Sacipto. “Term Limitation of Indonesian Parliamentarians Seen from Constitutionalism.” Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 11 (November 15, 2024): e263. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v11i2.91104.

Moonti, Roy Marthen, Arifin Tumuhulawa, Yayan Hanapi, Dince Aisa Kodai, and Oyald Puhi. “Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 9, no. 3 (2022): 1560–71.

Nainggolan, Maulina Roma Yanti, Muhammad Idiham, Ahmad Fajar Assidiqi, and Fajri Bahiyah Dienny. “Negara Hukum, Sumber Hukum, Eksistensi, Kedudukan Dan Susunan Pengadilan Tata Usaha.” Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU 1, no. 2 (2024): 123–28.

Nuna, Muten, Roy Marthen Moonti, Arifin Tumuhulawa, and Dince Aisa Kodai. “Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Putusan Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2020): 106–18.

Okprianti, Reny, Nur Husni Emilson, Salsabila Nariyah, Aisyah Febryta Sauly, Febriansyah Akbar, Ahmad Subari, and Royen Frananda. “Tindakan Yuridis Dalam Putusan Nomor 59/G/2021/Ptun. Mdn: Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 7, no. 2 (2024): 464–71.

Payoh, Karensia, and Arman Tjoneng. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Gugatan Mantan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi Di PTUN Jakarta Atas Pemulihan Jabatan Sebagai Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Konteks Kompetensi/Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 8 (2024). https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/497.

Rayhan, Ahmad, HE Rakhmat Jazuli, and Nurikah Nurikah. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara: Obyek Sengketa Negatif Dan Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik.” Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir 3, no. 3 (2023): 342–60.

Rayhan, Ahmad, and Sakti Krisna Wijaya. “Efektifitas Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Putusan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Peradaban Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 61–80.

Remaja, I. Nyoman Gede. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertipikat Ganda.” Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 10, no. 1 (2021): 111–20.

Sayuti, Abdurrahman. “Kedudukan Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Jaminan Penyedia Jasa Konstruksi Melalui Upaya Administratif.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 7, no. 1 (2024): 1–22.

Shodiqin, Ahmad. “Pursue The Position Of The State Administrative Court In Indonesia.” JUSTICES: Journal of Law 2, no. 2 (2023): 113–21.

Siregar, Khoiruddin Manahan. “Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan 6, no. 1 (2020): 88–100.

Sugita, I. Made. “Kedudukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Sebagai Lembaga Peradilan Khusus Di Indonesia Dengan Konsekuensinya.” VYAVAHARA DUTA 19, no. 1 (2024): 32–42.

TARIGAN, JON ADIGUNA. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kendala Pelaksanaan Putusan Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Yang ℡ah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap,” 2024. https://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/10748.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. (n.d.).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31026