PATIENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS GENERAL AND PELVIC EXAMINATION BY MALE MEDICAL STUDENTS

Valliammai Jayanthi Thirunavuk Arasoo

Abstract


Male medical students globally have difficulty in obtaining consent to perform pelvic examinations. We sought to identify independent factors influencing women consenting to male medical students performing general and pelvic examinations under supervision. This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital and a public health care centre in Johor Bahru, Malaysia where 369 women above 18 years old who have had sexual intercourse and no prior hysterectomy were recruited. A validated self-administered bilingual questionnaire was used to collect data on factors that influence them consenting to male medical students examining them and performing pelvic examination when indicated. The respondents were mostly below 30 years old (52.9%), Malays (73.4%), and Muslims (75.3%). The consent rates for general and pelvic examination were 27.4% and 18.9%, respectively. Being a Muslim, having an occupation, and being introduced by a male medical specialist increased women's likelihood of consenting to a general examination. However, a history of being examined by male students decreased the likelihood by 64%. Believing that male doctors should have the skills to treat patients in women's health was the only independent factor that increased the likelihood for women to consent for pelvic examinations to be conducted by male medical students. Believing that male doctors should be skilled in treating women positively influences the decision to consent. Explaining earnestly to women how they aid in developing the skills of future doctors should be prioritised.


Keywords


Male Medical Students; Multi-Ethnic; Pelvic Examination.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kempf AM, Pelletier A, Bartz D, Johnson NR. Consent Policies for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia Performed by Medical Students: A National Assessment. J Womens Health. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1161–5.

Thirunavuk Arasoo VJ, Dominic NA, Ratnasingam V, Ul Islam MI, Lee EZ, Wong JJM, et al. Patients’ Perception towards General and Pelvic Examination by Male Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study in a Multi-ethnic Population. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia. 2021 Sep 30;20(4).

Deesaen N, Sutantikorn K, Phonngoenchai P, Chaiyamahapruk S, Amatyakul P. Patients’ attitude and factors influencing the acceptance of medical students’ participation in pelvic examination. The Asia Pacific Scholar. 2022 Jan 4;7(1):87–97.

Zhao J, Song D, Yang Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Lin H. Expectations and their influencing factors of gynecological examination among female physical examination population; [女性体检人群对妇科检查的期望及其影响因素]. Chinese Journal of Health Management [Internet]. 2022;16(7):471 – 477. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163852663&doi=10.3760%2fcma.j.cn115624-20220416-00269&partnerID=40&md5=6d5ce03b9475979f58111eac1b67cb40

Sabet F, Zoghoul S, Alahmad M, Al Qudah H. The influence of gender on clinical examination skills of medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 31;20(1):98.

Gleisner J, Siwe K. Differences in teaching female and male intimate examinations: A qualitative study. Med Educ. 2020 Apr 29;54(4):348–55.

Alhomayani K, Bukhary H, Aljuaid F, Alotaibi TA, Alqurashi FS, Althobaiti K, et al. Gender Preferences in Healthcare: A Study of Saudi Patients’ Physician Preferences. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Feb;Volume 19:295–303.

O’Laughlin DJ, Strelow B, Fellows N, Kelsey E, Peters S, Stevens J, et al. Addressing Anxiety and Fear during the Female Pelvic Examination. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan 1;12.

Cutting R, Reddy V, Polam S, Neiman N, Manna D. Prevalence of pelvic examinations on anesthetized patients without informed consent. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2025 Feb 20;125(3):153–9.

Zuchelkowski BE, Eljamri S, Stern NG, Arora KS, Chang JC. Understanding Medical Students’ Concerns about Explicit Informed Consent for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia. J Surg Educ. 2024 Jan;81(1):64–9.

Kaur K, Salwi S, McNew K, Kumar N, Millimet H, Ravichandran N, et al. Medical Student Perspectives on the Ethics of Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia: A Multi-Institutional Study✰. J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov;79(6):1413–21.

Friesen P, Sun WL, Towle S. Consent and Educational Sensitive Exams on Anesthetized Patients: Experiences of Medical Students Across Canada. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2024 Nov;46(11):102585.

Devlin A, Gonzalez E, Ramsey F, Esnaola N, Fisher S. The Effect of Discrimination on Likelihood of Participation in a Clinical Trial. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Dec 10;7(6):1124–9.

Turner L, Taylor S, Ward A, Thistlethwaite F, Yorke J. The Barriers and Enablers to Participation in Oncology Clinical Trials for Ethnically Diverse Communities. Cancer Nurs. 2026 Jan;49(1):E81–98.

Mohamed ER, Almulhem MA, AlElq AH, Zeeshan M, Alharbi RS, Almuhanna AE, et al. Obstetrics and gynecology patients’ perceptions about bedside teaching at a Saudi teaching hospital. J Family Community Med. 2024 Apr;31(2):168–75.

Kannai R, Freud T, Test T, Peleg R. Policy implications of physicians’ attitudes towards being examined by medical students. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Aug 13;14(1):50.

Jabbour L, Akpan E, Langhe R. Patient Opinions about Medical Student Involvement in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Ir Med J [Internet]. 2021;114(9). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125132851&partnerID=40&md5=5026b82bb9eb586bff941317f60b7d63

Ezzati R, Tafazoli M, Mazlom SR, Pour NA. The effect of empathy skill training on clinical competence in midwifery students. HAYAT [Internet]. 2020;26(3):295 – 308. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098065663&partnerID=40&md5=98b90cb907f3444619576e02545801be

Lee JJM, Cheong X, Tan TY, Zhong Y, Chua C, Goy Wee Lip R, et al. A qualitative study of patients’ experience during vaginal examination & transvaginal ultrasound in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. 2024 Jan 5;33.

Meeker MA, White D. Transition to comfort-focused care: Moral agency of acute care nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2021 Jun 14;28(4):529–42.

Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Agbaglo E, Adu C, Budu E, Hagan JE, et al. Determinants of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance services utilization among childbearing women in Guinea: evidence from the 2018 Guinea Demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 3;21(1):2.

King JK, Kieu A, El-Deyarbi M, Aljneibi N, Al-Shamsi S, Hashim MJ, et al. Towards a better understanding between non-Muslim primary care clinicians and Muslim patients: A literature review intended to reduce health care inequities in Muslim patients. Health Policy Open. 2023 Dec;4:100092.

Le Lous M, Dion L, Le Ray C. Simulation training for pelvic examination: A systematic review. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec;52(10):102666.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/ijhsmr.v5i1.35531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Visitor International Journal Of Health Science & Medical Research