Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

 
Jambura  Journal Civic Education (JACEDU, E-ISSN: 27984818, P-ISSN :2808-2249)  menyediakan wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah. Ruang lingkup artikel yang tercantum dalam jurnal ini berkaitan dengan berbagai topik, antara lain:
  1. pendidikan pancasila
  2. pendidikan kewarganegaraan
  3. pendidikan karakter
  4. sosio kultural
  5. hukum dan pemerintahan 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Artikel yang dikirimkan akan direview oleh reviewer untuk setiap artikel dengan tipe peer review buta. Poin-poin utama yang akan dilihat dalam proses review adalah judul artikel, penggunaan literatur, metodologi, referensi, kebaruan, dll. Proses review memakan waktu satu bulan dan tentunya reviewer yang dipilih berdasarkan keahlian pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan, keahlian dibidang politik, keahlian dibidang sosio kultural dan keahlian dibidang hukum dan pemerintahan

 

Publication Frequency

The journal published two times in a year namely july and december. Each edition contains 5 articles.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

Jambura Journal Civic Education (JACEDU) adalah jurnal yang dikelola secara profesional oleh Program Studi Pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan FIS, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia dengan memperhatikan hak cipta, privasi, dan aturan publikasi ilmiah. Setiap artikel yang diterbitkan berfokus terutama pada pendidikan pancasila, Pendidikan kewarganegaraan, pendidikan karakter, sosio kultural, hukum dan pemerintahan. Artikel ditulis oleh penulis yang berkompeten di bidangnya dan bersumber dari hasil kajian / penelitian. Setiap konten artikel mengandung unsur kebaruan, orisinalitas, dan kegunaan. Untuk meningkatkan kualitas jurnal dan profesionalisme penulis, editor, reviewer, dan pengelola jurnal, maka dibentuklah “Etika Publikasi Ilmiah JACEDU” dan Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Mereka untuk menghindari malpraktek dalam penerbitan jurnal dan pelanggaran hak cipta, seperti duplikasi, fabrikasi, pemalsuan, dan plagiarisme. Mereka mengacu pada "Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah". Mereka diharapkan dapat diimplementasikan oleh penulis, editor, reviewer, dan manajer jurnal.

ETIKA PENULIS

  • Pelaporan; Penulis harus melaporkan proses dan hasil penelitiannya secara adil, jelas, tepat, akurat, menyeluruh, dan tidak memihak serta menyimpan datanya dengan baik. Kejujuran sangat diharapkan dalam menyajikan setiap data dan informasi yang tercantum dalam isi dan hasil penelitian.
  • Keaslian; Penulis membuat pernyataan bahwa makalah yang dikirimkan ke editor jurnal adalah asli (dari ide penulis sendiri), belum pernah disampaikan dan dipublikasikan di media manapun, dalam bahasa apapun, dan tidak dalam proses penyerahan ke penerbit lain. Kasus duplikasi dan penipuan publikasi, artikel tersebut akan dihapus dari jurnal ini.
  • Clear sources; authors should mention and ensure that any reading materials used as citations and bibliography are written clearly and completely. Authors are strictly forbidden to quote the writings of others without citing the original source.
  • Responsibility; authors are fully responsible for the data and research writings, in terms of methods, analysis, calculation, and details. If verification is required from editors and reviewers, the authors are willing to answer it clearly, precisely and fairly.
  • Agreement; authors ensure that the names listed in the article are based on contributions of ideas and thoughts every writer and have been approved by the entire team of writers. Any changes, reductions or additions of author names, should be approved the team of writers. Any other parties contributing fully ( non-substance ) in writing this paper,  the authors express their gratitude to the relevant parties.
  • Punctuality; authors revise the script and edit texts punctually for the sake of discipline and regular journal publication. Otherwise, the authors are ready to take the consequences, which is the delay of journal article publication.
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest; authors uphold copyright and privacy of one another to avoid conflicts of interest. In the event of a conflict of interest with other parties, the authors must solve it justly and wisely.

EDITOR ETHICS

 

  • Neutrality; the editor is neutral in selecting and screening manuscript. The editor must be objective and fair to all writers who submitted their written works. The editor is forbidden to be discriminative to the authors in terms of gender, ethnicity, religion, race, intergroup, or nationality.
  • Reporting; editor reports the selection and reviews scripts clearly and accurately to the author based on accuracy, completeness, and clarity of reporting of result research and its development, including editing techniques and the use of guidelines for publication and screenwriting.
  • Communicative; editor communicates effectively and efficiently in the process of publishing the journal. Every suggestion and criticism from authors, reviewers, and journal managers should be addressed clearly, fairly and transparently.
  • Fairness; editor distributes scripts to editor team members and reviewers fairly based on their respective competence.
  • Professional; editor works professionally based on his duties and responsibilities. The editor should understand any policy related to journal publication. Editor ensures that every script has undergone the editorial process and review correctly, fairly, and objectively.
  • Responsibility; editor takes full responsibility for the success of journal publication. Editor guarantees that every journal article published is a new paper and not a copy, and gives benefits to those reading and accessing the journals.
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editor upholds copyright and privacy of each other to avoid conflict of interest. Should a conflict of interest arise with other parties, an editor must solve it justly and wisely.

REVIEWER ETHICS

 

  • Neutrality; reviewer is fair, objective, unbiased, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The script review process is carried out professionally without distinguishing the writer’s background. The reviewer is prohibited conduct a review of papers involving himself, either directly or indirectly.
  • Professional; reviewer should be critical and professional in assessing a paper (related to his expertise), open about new things, able to keep the secret of the things being assessed, does not take personal advantage of the paper he assesses, as well as has a passion for improving written works. The reviewer has the right to refuse a script if it does not correspond to his expertise. He then can recommend it to the other more competent reviewers in accordance with the scope of publication.
  • Quality assurance; reviewer has a duty to assist editors in improving the quality of paper he reviews. Reviewer analyzes papers on the substance not on grammar, punctuation, and typos. The reviewer is required to uphold the basic principles and scientific analysis in the process of reviewing a paper. Reviewer works on the principle of truth, novelty, and originality; prioritizes benefit of the paper for the development of science, technology, and innovation; as well as understands the impact of paper on the development of science.
  • Punctuality; reviewer reviews the script and gives a response to the editor quickly, expected to be on time. If the time is not enough, the reviewer then informs the editor with a clear reason for the sake of discipline and regularity of journal publication.
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewer upholds copyright and privacy of each other in order to avoid conflicts of interest. Should a conflict of interest arise with other parties, the reviewer must finish it justly and wisely.

JOURNAL MANAGEMENT ETHICS

 

  • Decision-making; journal managers should define the vision, mission, and goals of the organization in journal publication based on the recommendation of reviewers and the editorial board. To do so, journal managers are neutral and free from conflicts of interest of individuals or groups, business aspects, aspects of ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup.
  • Freedom; journal managers give freedom to the reviewer and editor to create harmony at working atmosphere and mutual respect for one another in order to guarantee and protect intellectual property rights, particularly those related to the management of funds received from third parties. Journal managers encourage editors and reviewers to apply the ethics clearance including confidentiality, licensing, and special requirements in research on humans, animals, and other living creatures.
  • Responsibility; journal managers are responsible for the guideline of journal publication policies, starting from the name of an issue, scientific scope, script writing style, collaboration, licensing and legal publications, and evaluation of script publication.
  • Promotion; journal managers promote and ensure the sustainability of journal publication. Journal managers are entitled to determine the funding in accordance with the policies and needs of journal publication. In its management, funders do not intervene in terms of issue substance. Source of research and development fund is included in the publication without affecting the reader's perception.
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest; journal managers uphold copyright and privacy of each other to avoid conflicts of interest. In the event of the conflict of interest with other parties, journal managers must finish it justly and wisely.

 

 

Screening For Plagiarism

Plagiarisme adalah masalah serius dan sangat mudah dihindari. Artikel mengindikasikan bahwa plagiarisme tidak boleh dipublikasikan di Jambura Jurnal Civic Education (Jacedu). Kami menggunakan perangkat lunak Pemeriksa Plagiarisme untuk deteksi dini kemungkinan plagiarisme. Namun tetap saja jika nantinya ditemukan artikel yang dijiplak, tindakan yang tepat akan diambil sesuai dengan pedoman penerbit tentang plagiarisme. Kami akan meninjau artikel yang dicurigai / diklaim tidak sesuai dengan etika publikasi penerbit JGEJ dan artikel tersebut dapat ditarik kembali. Selain itu, artikel harus di bawah 20 persen agar kesamaan.