Juxtaposing The Territorial Integrity and Self-Determination Principles in Nagorno-Karabakh Dispute

I Gusti Ayu Khanaya Manohara, I Made Budi Arsika, I Made Sena Darmasetiyawan

Abstract


The separation of the former Soviet Union resulted in non civic divorces; ethnic cleansing, massacres, a territorial dispute which the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute stands as an example of. This conflict has been going on for years and is constantly evolving and regularly flares up resulting in casualties. The differing accusation of Armenia and Azerbaijan regarding the issue of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict create different dimensions of the parties. Armenia sees the settlement as in the framework of self-determination whereas Azerbaijan pertains to the principle of territorial integrity in which both are the basic principles of international law thus leading to confusion regarding the legal dimensions of the conflict. With the most recent aggression, it is paramount now more than ever to seek the best possible settlement to put an end to the dispute. Until recently, Armenia accepts a deal with Russia to surrender the disputed territory by withdrawing its army. The main objective of this article is to give a general assessment of the disputed principles in this case

Keywords


Self-determination; Territorial integrity; Dispute; International law.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljazeera. “What’s Turkey’s role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?” https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/10/30/whats-turkeys-role-in-the-nagorno-karabakh-conflict

BBC NEWS. "Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia Sign Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Deal". 2021.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54882564

Carter, D. B., & Goemans, H. E. (2011). The Making of the Territorial Order: New Borders and the Emergence of Interstate Conflict. International Organization, 65(2), 275-309. doi:10.1017/s0020818311000051

Castellino, Joshua. (2014) ”International law and self-determination: peoples, indigenous peoples, and minorities.” In Self-determination and secession in international law, edited by Christian Walter, Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, and Kavus Abushov, 27-44. Oxford University Press

Charter of the United Nations (1945)

Conference of Yugoslavia Arbitration Commission Opinion No.3, 31 I.L.M 1488 (1922)

Crisis Group. "The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Visual Explainer". 2021. https://www.crisisgroup.org/content/nagorno-karabakh-conflict-visual-explainer.

Cqqrcengange. Self-Determination for Nagorno Karabakh. (n.d.). 2021. https://cqrcengage.com/anca/nkrfreedom

Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, G.A. Res. 2625 (1970).

Digging out of Deadlock in Nagorno-Karabakh. (2019, December 20). Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/caucasus/nagorno-karabakh-conflict/255-digging-out-deadlock-nagorno-karabakh

Driest, S. F. (2015). From Kosovo to Crimea and Beyond: On Territorial Integrity, Unilateral Secession and Legal Neutrality in International Law. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 22(4), 467-485. doi:10.1163/15718115-02204002

Fadilah, I & Adirespati, PS,. (2019). “Self-Determination and Territorial Integrity Revisited: Reflecting Chagos Advisory Opinion and its Comparison with West Papua”. Indonesian Journal of International Law 17, no. 1: 65

Filitov, A, & Williams, R.. (2011). "The End of the Cold War and the Dissolution of the USSR". Journal of Modern European History 9, no. 3: 298-307

Frontier Dispute ( Burkina Faso v Republic of Mali), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 554

Franck, Thomas M. “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance.”American Journal of International Law. Vol. 86, no. 1 (1998): 46-91.

Geohistory. “Nagorno-Karabakh”. 2021. https://geohistory.today/nagorno-karabakh/.

Hannum, Hurst.”The Concept and Definition of Minorities.” In Universal Minority Rights, edited by Weller Marc, 49-73. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Hannum, Hurst. “The Right of Self-Determination in the Twenty-First Century.”55 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 773, (1998)

Higgins, Rosalyn. Problems & Process, International Law and How We Use It. London: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Hilpold, Peter (2017). "Self-determination and Autonomy: Between Secession and Internal Self-determination". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 24, no. 3: 302-35

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process, International Law and How We Use It (London: Oxford University Press, 1995), 124.

International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010, p. 403

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (1966)

Jaber, Tamara. (2011). “A case for Kosovo? Self-determination and secession in the 21st century”. The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 15: 926-947

Kadir, M. Yakub Ayyub. (2016). “Application of The Law of Self-Determination in The Post-Colonial Context: A Guideline”. Journal of East Asia and International Law 9, no. 1: 14

Keddie, P. (2020). What's Turkey's role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict? Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/10/30/whats-turkeys-role-in-the-nagorno-karabakh-conflict

Land Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (Salvador v. Honduras), Judgment, I.C.J Reports 1992, p. 47

MacFarlane, N, & Sabanadze, N,. (2013). "Sovereignty and Self-determination: Where Are We?". International Journal 68, no. 4: 609-27

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 14

Miklasová, Julia. (2020). The Recent Ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh: Territorial Control, Peacekeepers and Question of Status, EJIL Talk, December 4, 2020

Peters, Anne (2014). “The principle of “Uti Possidetis Juris” : how relevant is it for issues of secession?, In: Self-determination and secession in international law. Oxford University Press, Pg. 95-137

Puri, Balraj. (2001). "Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity and Right of Self-Determination." Economic and Political Weekly 36, no. 4: 263

Radan, Peter "Republika Srpska Krajina And The Right Of Peoples To Self-Determination". Istorija 20. Veka 36 (2018): 9

Raic, D. (2002). “Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination”. New York: Kluwer Law International,

Ratner, Steven B. (1996). “Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States,” American Journal of International Law 90, no. 4: 595

Reinold, Theresa. (2011). "STATE WEAKNESS, IRREGULAR WARFARE, AND THE RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE POST-9/11". The American Journal of International Law 105, no. 2: 244

Rodriguez-Santiago, Elizabeth.”The Evolution of Self-Determination of Peoples in International Law.” In The Theory of Self-Determination, edited by Fernando Teson, 201-240. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Sarvarian, Arman (2015). "Uti Possidetis Iuris" in the Twenty-First Century: Consensual or Customary?" International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22, no. 4: 511-32

Sterio, Milena. “Secession: A Proposal for a New Legal Framework”German Yearbook of International Law, Forthcoming, Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper, (2016): 16-294

Summers, James. “Self-determination, Resources and Borders: Introduction to the Special Issue.”International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22, no. 4 (2015):

Supreme Court of Canada Reference re Secession of Quebec, (1998) 2 S.C.R. 217459-66.

The Unification Treaty between the FRG and the GDR (Berlin, 31 August 1990), Art. 4(1)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Velasco, Zoilo A. 2014. "Self-Determination And Secession: Human Rights-Based Conflict Resolution". International Community Law Review 16 (1): 75-105. doi:10.1163/18719732-12341271.

W. Czaplinski. (1992). ‘Current Developments. The Reunification of Germany’. American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86, p. 153

Yfantidis, Andreas "The Limits Of Self-Determination And The Cases Of Forced Separatism: The Example Of Northern Cyprus", Open Journal Of Political Science no. 6 (2016): 162




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i1.10579

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 I Gusti Ayu Khanaya Manohara, I Made Budi Arsika, I Made Sena Darmasetiyawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)
E-mail: jamburalawreview@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension World Cat
Microsoft Academic OneSearch Scilit RSZ
ESJI EuroPub Orcid EZB

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:

Leipzig Julich Harvard Stanford
slot online slot gacor slot