Responsibilities of Financial Technology Company Due To Failure to Pay By Loan Recipients
Abstract
One form of business is due to current developments in financial technology (abbreviated as fintech), which means using technology to provide financial solutions. This study aims to see the responsibility of PT. Dana Agung Nusantara as the financial technology (fintech) lending provider due to default by lending recipients in the case of Central Jakarta Commercial Court Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Jkt.Pst. This research is normative juridical research. In this study, the source of legal materials used consisted of 3 (three) legal materials, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting data on legal materials is by using a literature study model using analysis of legal materials, which is used in descriptive qualitative content analysis. The results showed that the responsibility of PT. Dana Agung Nusantara as the financial technology (fintech) lending provider due to default by loan recipients by the case of Central Jakarta Commercial Court Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus- PKPU/2021/PN Jkt.Pst that according to an OJK spokesperson, the party is responsible if The fintech collapsed is a P2P lending fintech provider. Meanwhile, if the borrower causes a default, it is the responsibility of the lender or investor.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Douglas W. Arner, Jànos Barberis, Ross P. Buckley. (2016). “The Evolution of FinTech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm?”, Jurnal The University Of Hongkong
E. Saefullah Wiradipradja. (2012). Dampak Negatif Globalisasi Terhadap Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Bangsa Indonesia Dan Strategi Menghadapinya, dalam An An Chandrawulan et al, “Kompilasi Hukum Bisnis Dalam Rangka Purnabakti Prof. Dr. H. Man Sastrawidjaja. S.H., S.U.,”. Bandung: CV. Keni
Edy Santoso. (2018). Pengaruh Era GlobalisasiTerhadap Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Fauziah Hadi, Penerapan Financial Technology (Fintech) sebagai Inovasi Pengembangan Keuangan Digital di Indonesia, terdapat dalam http://temilnas16.forsebi.org/penerapan financial-technology-fintech-sebagai- inovasi-pengembangan-keuangan-digital-di-indonesia.
Haris Faulidi Asnawi. (2004). “Transaksi Bisnis E-Commerce Perspektif Islam”. Yogyakarta: Magistra Insania Press
Heryucha Romanna Tampubolon. (2019). “Seluk-Beluk Peer to peer lending Sebagai Wujud Baru Keuangan Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3 (2).
Hikmahanto Juwana. (2002). Bunga Rampai Hukum Ekonomi Dan Hukum Internasional. Tangerang: Lentera Hati
Ibrahim, Jhonny. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.
Nofie Iman. (2016). Financial Technology dan Lembaga Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Gathering Mitra Linkage Bank Syariah Mandiri
Novita, W. S., & Imanullah, M. N. Aspek Hukum Peer To Peer Lending (Identifikasi Permasalahan Hukum dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian). Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Penyelenggara Fintech Terdaftar di OJK Per 1 Februari 2019”. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/Pages/FAQ-Otoritas-JasaKeuangan .aspx.
POJK Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 on Information Technology-Based Lending Services.
Rusli, Hardijan . (2006). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Bagaimana?. Law Review 5 (3).
Salma, C. R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerima Pinjaman Dalam Perjanjian Penggunaan Layanan Peer To Peert Lending. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum.
Sarwin Kiko Napitupulu,dkk. (2017). Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Fintech. Jakarta: Departemen Perlindungan Konsumen - Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Siprianus, Edi Hardum, (2021), Kasus Fintech, PN Jakpus Tolak Gugatan PT Ayers terhadap PT Dana Agung Nusantara, https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/759419/kasus- fintech-pn-jakpus-tolak-gugatan-pt-ayers-terhadap-pt-dana-agung-nusantara.
Wahyu. T. Rahmawati. (2018). Inilah Pihak Yang Bertanggung Jawab Jika Fintech Kolaps. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/inilah-pihak-yang-bertanggung-jawab-jika- fintech-kolaps.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i2.11267
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sylvia Janisriwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS.
Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:
Jambura Law Rev. has been available at: