The Problem of Diversion in Children Perpetrators of Traffic Violations in Indonesia

Lafri Prasetyono

Abstract


Children as perpetrators of traffic accidents that cause fatalities, this is one of the classic problems related to the application of the legal system and its functionalization by law enforcement officials in Indonesia. How is the protection of children in the juvenile criminal justice system related to the Diversion Problems in Children Traffic Violators in Indonesia? Regarding the Criminal Code and Article 310 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System as regulated in Article 1 paragraph (7), Article 12, Article 52 verse 5. The results of the research found that there are still disparities (differences) in the law enforcement process in Indonesia for children as traffic offenders and other findings related to diversion techniques are found in the Indonesian Police Criminal Investigation Unit No. Pol.: TR/1124/XI/2006 which provides instructions and rules that can refer to the completion of diversion efforts. Diversion efforts at the level of investigation related to Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System, the prosecution and examination of children's cases in district courts have not been implemented optimally so it is recommended that at the level of investigation, prosecution, and examination of children's cases in district courts it is advisable to make diversion efforts.


Keywords


Children, Traffic Regulations, Diversion Problems

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book:

Barry Goldson and John Muncie, (2006) “Rethinking Youth Justice”: Comparative Analysis, International Human Rights and Research Evidence.

Harefa, Beniharmoni, (2016), “Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak, Cetakan ke-1, Penerbit Deepublish, Yogyakarta.

Marlina, (2006), “Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Suatu Studi di Kota Medan)” Disertasi Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Sufriadi Pinim & Erasmus Napitupulu, (2013) Studi atas Praktik-praktik Peradilan Anak di Jakarta, Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta.

Suharto, (2002) Hukum Pidana Materiil, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soerjono , & Abdul Rahman, (2003),” Metode Penelitian Hukum”, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Taufik Makarao, (2013), “Pengkajian Hukum tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak-anak, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional”, Jakarta,

Journal:

Fachrizal Afandi, (2015),”Problematika Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Penyidikan Pidana dengan Pelaku Anak di Kepolisian Resort Malang”, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 1, April, Halaman 1-146.

Sopandi, Usep Lala, (2018). “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Kasus Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak” Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara Vol. 8 No. 1 Februari

Usep Lala Sopandi. (2018.) “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Kasus Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak” Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara Vol. 8 No. 1.

Umar Hasan, Tri Imam, Arsyad, Munandar “Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Dalam Perkara Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas” Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora P-ISSN: 2580-1244 Volume 4 Nomor 2 Desember 2020 E-ISSN: 2580-2305 LPPM Universitas Jambi Halaman | 467 Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi, Indonesi.

Yutirsa Yunus, (2013), “Analisa Konsep Restorative Justice Melalui Sistem Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia,” Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 2 No. 2, Agustus

Law:

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang lalulintas dan angkutan jalanraya Undang-undang Republik Inndonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Other sources:

http://sinarharapan.co/news/read/140616047/Pemerintah-Dinilai-Abaikan-Kepentingan Anak, diakses 3 September 2014 pukul 09.00 WIB.

http://yjj.sagepub.com/content/6/2/91.refs.html,%20diakses%203%20September%202014%20pukul %2009.30%20WIB

http://www.who.int/topics/injuries_traffic/en/.Diakses%2020%20July%202021%2012:19%20WIB.

https://ferli1982.wordpress.com/2013/03/05/diversi-dalam-sistem-peradilan-pidana-anak-Indonesia/

http://www.who.int/topics/injuries_traffic/en/.%20Diakses%2005-11-2016%2015:52

https://ferli1982.wordpress.com/2013/03/05/diversi-dalam-sistem-peradilan-pidana anak-di-Indonesia.

https://hukumtransportasi2015.wordpress.com/2015/05/08/undang-undang-no-22 tahun-2009-tentang-lalu-lintas-dan-angkutan-jalan/indonesia/

https://www.kpai.go.id/hukum/undang-undang-republik-indonesia-nomor-35-tahun-2014-tentang-perubahan-atas-undang-undang-nomor-23-tahun-2002-tentang perlindungan-anak http://yjj.sagepub.com/content/6/2/91.refs.html, diakses 3 September 2014 pukul 09.30 WIB.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v4i1.11419

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Lafri Prasetyono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)
E-mail: jamburalawreview@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension World Cat
Microsoft Academic OneSearch Scilit RSZ
ESJI EuroPub Orcid EZB

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:

Leipzig Julich Harvard Stanford