Artificial Intelligence in Civil Justice: Comparative Legal Analysis and Practical Frameworks for Indonesia
Abstract
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology presents opportunities to improve the efficiency and accessibility of the judicial system in civil procedural law reform. Nonetheless, its execution in Indonesia continues to encounter numerous obstacles, including infrastructure, regulatory issues, and opposition from law enforcement agencies. This study seeks to examine the impact of AI on improving access to and efficacy of justice within the framework of civil procedural law reform in Indonesia. We employ the normative legal research method, which utilizes an approach to law and literature review, to determine the potential and challenges of integrating AI into Indonesia's judicial system. Research findings suggest that AI can accelerate the litigation process and improve the uniformity of court decisions based on precise facts. To ensure optimal use of AI, comprehensive regulatory reform is necessary, along with improvements in infrastructure and training for law enforcement personnel. The findings highlight the importance of formulating policies that promote openness and ethics in AI utilization to maintain fairness principles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aidi, Zil. “Implementasi E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Yang Efektif Dan Efisien.†Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1 (January 31, 2020): 80. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.80-89.
Al-Obeidi, Ali Hadi, and Muaath Sulaiman Al-Mulla. “The Legal Basis of the Right to Explanation for Artificial Intelligence Decisions in UAE Law.†In 2022 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), 1–4. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: IEEE, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT57182.2022.9994088.
Amboro, Fl. Yudhi Priyo, and Khusuf Komarhana. “Prospek Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia [Prospects Of Artificial Intelligence As A Subject Of Civil Law In Indonesia].†Law Review, no. 2 (November 29, 2021): 145. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i2.3513.
Axpe, Miguel Ramón Viguri. “Ethical Challenges from Artificial Intelligence to Legal Practice.†In Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems, edited by Hugo Sanjurjo González, Iker Pastor López, Pablo GarcÃa Bringas, Héctor Quintián, and Emilio Corchado, 12886:196–206. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_17.
Bench-Capon, T.J.M. “Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law.†Edited by Francesca Toni. Argument & Computation 11, no. 1–2 (May 19, 2020): 221–38. https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-190477.
Bone, Rahdian Ade Putra, and Chami Yassine. “Judicial and Administrative Approaches to Civil Service Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Study between Indonesia, India, and Egypt.†International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law 1, no. 1 (2025): 21–41.
Boothby, William H. “Highly Automated and Autonomous Technologies.†In New Technologies and the Law in War and Peace, edited by William H. Boothby, 1st ed., 137–81. Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609388.007.
Coppola, Irene, and José de Arimateia Barbosa. “Implicações sociais da justiça digital,†2022. https://doi.org/10.34625/ISSN.2183-2705(NE2V2)2022.IC-06.
Dymitruk, Maria. “The Right to a Fair Trial in Automated Civil Proceedings.†Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 13, no. 1 (June 30, 2019): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-1-2.
Hakim, Faisal Luqman. “Simpliï¬kasi Prosedur Beracara Dengan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.†ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 5, no. 1 (October 25, 2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v5i1.85.
Herliana, Herliana. “Maqasid Al-Sharia in Court-Mediation Reform: A Study on Efficiency and Social Justice in Medical Disputes.†De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 15, no. 2 (December 29, 2023): 214–29. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i2.23962.
Irwansyah, Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.
Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, Novendri M. Nggilu, and Irlan Puluhulawa. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori, Aplikasi, Dan Inovasi Dalam Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Tiara Oktaviana Namira Daud. Kalimantan Selatan: Ruang Karya, 2025.
Ismail, Irawati Salim. “The Role of Legal Aid Station in Legal Aid Services in District Courts Gorontalo City.†Estudiante Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2023): 516–33.
Katz, Daniel Martin, Michael J. Bommarito, and Josh Blackman. “A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States.†Edited by LuÃs A. Nunes Amaral. PLOS ONE 12, no. 4 (April 12, 2017): e0174698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174698.
Kumar, Dinesh, and Ram Manohar Singh. “Exploring Court Performance and Developing Its Scale.†International Journal for Court Administration 13, no. 1 (April 22, 2022): 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.399.
Kusumawardani, Qur’ani Dewi. “Hukum Progresif Dan Perkembangan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan.†Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 166–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3270.
———. “Hukum Progresif Dan Perkembangan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan.†Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 166–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3270.
Manchester University, Aditya Putra Kurniawan, Triantono Triantono, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia, Muhammad Marizal, and Universitas Tidar, Indonesia. “Kiprah Filsafat Hukum Pada Pendidikan Hukum Di Era Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence).†Literasi Hukum 6, no. 2 (October 31, 2022): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.31002/lh.v6i2.6802.
Marques Martins, João. “A System of Communication Rules for Justifying and Explaining Beliefs about Facts in Civil Trials.†Artificial Intelligence and Law 28, no. 1 (March 2020): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09247-y.
Nowotko, Paweł Marcin. “AI in Judicial Application of Law and the Right to a Court.†Procedia Computer Science 192 (2021): 2220–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.235.
———. “AI in Judicial Application of Law and the Right to a Court.†Procedia Computer Science 192 (2021): 2220–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.235.
Obermeyer, Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. “Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations.†Science 366, no. 6464 (October 25, 2019): 447–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.
Rahardja, Untung. “Masalah Etis Dalam Penerapan Sistem Kecerdasan Buatan.†Technomedia Journal 7, no. 2 (August 24, 2022): 181–88. https://doi.org/10.33050/tmj.v7i2.1895.
Remus, Dana, and Frank S. Levy. “Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers, and the Practice of Law.†SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701092.
Roksandic, Suncana, Nikola Protrka, and Marc Engelhart. “Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Its Use by Law Enforcement Authorities: Where Do We Stand?†In 2022 45th Jubilee International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), 1225–32. Opatija, Croatia: IEEE, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.9803606.
Rusakova, Ekaterina P., and Evgenia E. Frolova. “Current Problems of Digital Justice in the BRICS Countries.†In Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment, edited by Agnessa O. Inshakova and Evgenia E. Frolova, 254:143–53. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12.
Salha, Raed A., Maher A. El-Hallaq, and Abdelkhalek I. Alastal. “Blockchain in Smart Cities: Exploring Possibilities in Terms of Opportunities and Challenges.†Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing 07, no. 03 (2019): 118–39. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2019.73008.
Santoso, Lukman, Agus Triyanta, and Jawahir Thontowi. “Halal Tourism Regulations in Indonesia: Trends and Dynamics in the Digital Era.†Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 1 (August 1, 2022): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.73-94.
Sibarani, William. “Modern Justice: Indonesia’s Supreme Court’s Challenges to Uphold Fair Trial Principles Through Digitalization.†Brawijaya Law Journal 10, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 106–21. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07.
Sukadi, Imam, and Erfaniah Zuhriah. “The Legal Policy of Judicial Power: The Idea of Implementation of Small Claim Courts in Religious Courts.†De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 13, no. 1 (July 28, 2021). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.10913.
Turner Lee, Nicol. “Detecting Racial Bias in Algorithms and Machine Learning.†Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16, no. 3 (August 13, 2018): 252–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-06-2018-0056.
Velicogna, Marco, Ernst Steigenga, Sandra Taal, and Aernout Schmidt. “Connecting EU Jurisdictions: Exploring How to Open Justice Across Member States Through ICT.†Social Science Computer Review 38, no. 3 (June 2020): 274–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318786949.
Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell. “Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI.†Computer Law & Security Review 41 (July 2021): 105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567.
Yusuf, N. A. S. “Implementation of the E-Litigation System in Civil Cases in the COVID-19 Pandemic Situation.†Disruption Law Review 1, no. 1 (2023): 64–77.
Ziemianin, Karolina. “Civil Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence. Future or Utopia?†Internet Policy Review 10, no. 2 (April 7, 2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1544.
Zul’fugarzade, Teimur E., Madina A. Tsirina, and Olga I. Semykina. “Improvement of Legal Groundwork for the Online Dispute Resolution System.†In Artificial Intelligence: Anthropogenic Nature vs. Social Origin, edited by Elena G. Popkova and Bruno S. Sergi, 1100:792–800. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.27786
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ummi Maskanah
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e4a/23e4acc4ed22c1ae51d49e8e997e015746b90c24" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS.
Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |||
Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |