The Dynamics of the Legal Construction of Blasphemy in Indonesia and Singapore

Dewi Bunga, Ni Luh Gede Wariati, Putu Santi Oktarina, Ni Wayan Satri Adnyani, Lina Sakina Salim

Abstract


The legal regulation of blasphemy has followed markedly uneven trajectories across jurisdictions. The United Nations and the international human rights movement have criticized the persistence of blasphemy norms, and many states have removed such prohibitions from their criminal codes; Indonesia and Singapore, however, continue to regulate blasphemy and related intolerant conduct. This study addresses two questions: how freedom of religion is protected under international law and within the legal systems of Indonesia and Singapore, and how blasphemy is legally constructed in the two jurisdictions. It adopts a normative juridical method combining statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. At the international level, religious freedom is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Both Indonesia and Singapore recognize and guarantee freedom of religion, although Singapore presents itself constitutionally as a secular state. Indonesia maintains comprehensive and strict prohibitions on blasphemy, whereas Singapore does not prohibit blasphemy as such but regulates religion in the interest of social order and national security. Singapore’s criminal sanctions are less severe than Indonesia’s, and Singapore allows conviction records to be rendered spent. Indonesia, by contrast, treats blasphemy as a serious offense and provides for it in numerous legal instruments carrying severe criminal penalties. The comparison demonstrates that the two states adopt structurally different models of legal protection: Indonesia frames blasphemy as an offense against the sanctity of religion itself, whereas Singapore frames comparable conduct as a threat to public order and inter-group harmony rather than to religion as such. This distinction, rather than the severity of criminal sanctions alone, explains the divergent trajectories of legal reform in the two jurisdictions.

Keywords


legal construction; blasphemy; freedom of religion; Indonesia; Singapore

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adare, Randy A. “Delik Penodaan Agama Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Lex et Societatis 1, no. 1 (2013): 94.

Adji, Oemar Seno. Herziening, Ganti Rugi, Suap, Perkembangan Delik. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1981.

Al Khanif. Hukum dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Mediatama, 2010.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Delik Agama dan Penghinaan Tuhan (Blasphemy) di Indonesia dan Perbandingan Berbagai Negara. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2008.

Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. General Recommendation No. 35 on Combating Racist Hate Speech. UN Doc. CERD/C/GC/35, 26 September 2013.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, art. 15.

Fiss, Joelle, and Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum. Respecting Rights? Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws. Washington, DC: United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, 2017.

Goh Yan Han. “New Law to Protect Racial Harmony Passed.” Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/new-law-to-protect-racial-harmony-passed.

Hasbi, Yusrizal, Ferdy Saputra, Hadi Iskandar, Laila Muhammad Rasyid, and Harun Harun. “Criminalising Women, Silencing Victims: Human Rights and Sharia Enforcement in Aceh.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 17, no. 1 (June 2025): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.29635.

Hatta, Muhammad, Zulfan, and Husni. “Kejahatan Penistaan Agama dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya.” Al-‘Adl: Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 2 (2021): 354–55.

Hertanto, Eko. “Implikasi Reformulasi Delik Penodaan Agama dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 terhadap Pelaksanaan Fungsi Kejaksaan dalam Pengawasan Aliran Kepercayaan Keagamaan Masyarakat.” The Prosecutor Law Review 2, no. 3 (2024): 57–81.

Hiariej, Eddy O. S., and Topo Santoso. Anotasi KUHP Nasional. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2025.

Indrayanti, Kadek Wiwik, and Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati. “Criminalizing and Penalizing Blasphemy: The Need to Adopt a Human Rights Approach in the Reform of Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022): 2104704.

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. 21 December 1965, 660 U.N.T.S. 195.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 16 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.

Lamintang, P. A. F., and Theo Lamintang. Delik-Delik Khusus: Kejahatan terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Negara. Bandung: Sinar Grafika, 2023.

Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (National Penal Code) (Indonesia).

Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (Indonesia).

Lim, Jean. “Maintenance of Religious Harmony Bill.” Singapore Infopedia. National Library Board. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=3edc3e5f-7333-4ae9-ba2d-7c355c4a1cee.

Maintenance of Racial Harmony Act 2025 (Singapore).

Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act 1990 (Singapore).

Manan, Bagir, Ali Abdurahman, and Mei Susanto. “Pembangunan Hukum Nasional yang Religius: Konsepsi dan Tantangan dalam Negara Berdasarkan Pancasila.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 176–95.

Marshall, Heather. “‘We Don’t Have Blasphemy Laws in England.’ What Does This Mean for RE?” Journal of Religious Education 72, no. 1 (2024): 109–28.

Masud, Mahmoud. “Conceptual and Legal Harmonisation of Offensive Anti-Religious Speech: Reconciling the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights with the Approach of Muslim States for the Protection of Islamic Beliefs, and Muslim and Non-Muslim Minority Groups.” 2023.

Masyhar, Ali, Rohadhatul Aisy, Anis Widyawati, M. Azil Maskur, and Ali Murtadho. “Reclaiming the Unwritten: Living Law’s Prospects under Indonesia’s 2023 Penal Reform.” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 1 (July 2025): 255–85. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.502.

Ministry of Home Affairs (Singapore). “Commencement of the Sedition (Repeal) Act 2021.” Press release, 1 November 2022. https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/press-releases/commencement-of-the-sedition-repeal-act-2021.

Mubayyinah, Fira, Febri Handayani, and Moh. Agus Sifa’. “Legal Pluralism, Epistemic Tensions, and the Reformulation of the Adultery Offense in Indonesia’s New Penal Code.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 8, no. 2 (December 17, 2025): 573–94. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14957.

Mudzakkir. Kajian terhadap Praktik Penegakan Hukum dan Prospek Pengaturannya dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 2012.

Munazih, Muflih, and Dina Faramida. “Constitutional Judicial System: A Comparison between Indonesia and France.” Trunojoyo Law Review 7, no. 2 (August 2025): 391–413. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v7i2.30462.

Musa, Mohammad Alami. “Singapore’s Secularism and Its Pragmatic Approach to Religion.” Religions 14, no. 2 (2023): 219.

Penal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht) (Indonesia), arts. 156 and 156a.

Penal Code 1871 (Singapore), ss. 298 and 298A.

Police Circular No. SE/6/X/2015 on the Handling of Hate Speech (Indonesia).

Presidential Decree (Penetapan Presiden) No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Prevention of Abuse and/or Defamation of Religion (Indonesia).

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco, 1986.

Registration of Criminals Act 1949 (Singapore).

Rufaedah, Any. “Accounting for a Riot: Religious Identity, Denying One’s Prejudice, and the Tool of Blasphemy.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2021): 69–85.

Rumagit, Reza Bierhoff Xaverius. “Tinjauan Yuridis mengenai Delik Penodaan Agama dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Lex Administratum 11, no. 5 (2023).

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision No. 71 K/Kr/1973.

Tobroni, Faiq, Ach Tahir, Iswantoro, Udiyo Basuki, and Murdoko. “The End of Blasphemy Crimes in Indonesia: Shifts in Human Rights Limitations and MUI’s Fatwa Authority.” LITIGASI 26, no. 2 (October 2025). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.31471.

Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana. “Indonesia’s Press Freedom and Law at Twenty-Five: Achievements, Legal Changes and Continuing Challenges.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 13, no. 2 (July 2025): 290–308. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1761.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. Res. 217 A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810, 10 December 1948.

Yu, Andrew, and Stephanie Kwan Nga Lam. “Decriminalising Homosexuality in Singapore: Political Responses from the Perspective of Secularism and Electoral Pragmatism.” The Round Table 112, no. 2 (2023): 163–72.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i2.34679

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dewi Bunga, Ni Luh Gede Wariati, Putu Santi Oktarina, Ni Wayan Satri Adnyani, Lina Sakina Salim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension