Constitutional Limits to Omnibus Legislation: Indonesia, Germany, and the Protection of Essential Rights

Mery Herlina; Susi Dwi Harijanti; Ni’matul Huda; Ali Abdurahman; Ahmed Mohamed Barak

doi:10.33756/jlr.v1i2.37610

Constitutional Limits to Omnibus Legislation: Indonesia, Germany, and the Protection of Essential Rights

Mery Herlina, Susi Dwi Harijanti, Ni’matul Huda, Ali Abdurahman, Ahmed Mohamed Barak

Abstract

The growing use of omnibus legislation reflects governments’ efforts to accelerate regulatory reform and overcome statutory fragmentation. However, when this technique alters legal regimes governing constitutionally protected rights, legislative efficiency may conflict with deliberative legitimacy, legal clarity, and substantive rights protection. This article examines the constitutional limits of omnibus legislation through a comparative study of Indonesia and Germany. It employs a normative legal method combining statutory, constitutional, conceptual, and functional comparative approaches. The comparison evaluates both jurisdictions through common variables: legislative structure, rights protection, legal definiteness, public deliberation, proportionality, and constitutional review. The study finds that Indonesia’s Job Creation framework has primarily generated constitutional scrutiny concerning legislative procedure, transparency, and meaningful public participation, while its substantive effects on environmental, land, and socio-economic rights remain insufficiently addressed through a coherent constitutional standard. Germany, although not formally recognising omnibus legislation as a distinct category, controls complex and multi-subject legislation through the Rechtsstaat principle, legal definiteness, proportionality, federal deliberation, and rights-based judicial review. Based on these findings, the article develops the Essential Rights Exclusion Principle, under which omnibus legislation directly altering the scope, protection, enforceability, or institutional safeguards of essential constitutional rights must be excluded from ordinary legislative consolidation unless supported by heightened deliberation, rights-specific justification, and intensified judicial scrutiny. The principle provides a structured constitutional standard for reconciling regulatory efficiency with democratic accountability and the protection of essential rights.

Keywords

Omnibus Legislation; Constitutional Limits; Essential Fundamental Rights; Comparative Constitutional Law; Rechtsstaat Framework

Full Text:

PDF

References

Admiral, Admiral, Ridwan Arifin, Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, and Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali. “Unfair Terms in Standard Digital Contracts: A Hidden Threat to Human Rights and Consumer Justice.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 3 (2025): 312. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v14i3.109656.

Alamri, Muthi’ah. “Constitutional Courts and the Protection of Constitutional Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Authority in Indonesia and Morocco.” International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law, September 30, 2025, 116–30. https://doi.org/10.66502/0wcva437.

Anggono, Bayu Dwi, and Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus. “Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland.” Lentera Hukum 7, no. 3 (2020): 319. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.19895.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. “The Implementation of Omnibus Law in Indonesia Law Making Process on Philosophy Review.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 14, no. 1 (2022): 179–94. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.15757.

Arifin, Saru. “Illiberal Tendencies in Indonesian Legislation: The Case of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 9, no. 3 (2021): 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2021.1942374.

Arndt, Felix, Anna-Lena Högenauer, and Claus Koggel. “Germany’s Parliamentary Administration.” In The Routledge Handbook of Parliamentary Administrations, 1st ed., by Thomas Christiansen, Elena Griglio, and Nicola Lupo. Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181521-22.

Ayuni, Qurrata, Satrio Alif Febriyanto, and Fitriana. “Strengthening the Renewable Energy Bill: Promoting Sustainability within Constitutional Rights.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1537, no. 1 (2025): 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1537/1/012039.

Bodle, R., and S. Sina. “The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Climate Change Act.” Carbon & Climate Law Review 16, no. 1 (2022): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2022/1/5.

Däubler, Thomas, Jochen Müller, and Christian Stecker. “Assessing Democratic Representation in Multi-Level Democracies.” West European Politics 41, no. 3 (2018): 541–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1409498.

Farah Syah Rezah, Nurul Qamar. Metode Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal Dan Non-Doktrinal. Social Politik Genius, 2020.

Gunawan, Hendra, and Syahbudin Syahbudin. “Legal Reconstruction of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation for Justice in Enhancing Investment and Indonesia’s Competitiveness.” Jurnal Hukum 41, no. 2 (2025): 253. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.44442.

Hasanah, Siti, and Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara. “Non-Formal Legitimacy of Constitutional Change and Public Perception in The Reform of the 1945 Constitution Through Constitutional Court Decisions.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 13, no. 3 (2025): 621–37. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1841.

Hazama, Yasushi, and Şeref Iba. “Legislative Agenda Setting by a Delegative Democracy: Omnibus Bills in the Turkish Parliamentary System.” Turkish Studies 18, no. 2 (2017): 313–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1261022.

Herms, Eilert. “Institutions of Physical and Cultural Reproduction of the Community: Socio-Ethical Consideration of Their Regulation by the Constitution.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 115, no. 1 (2018): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1628/zthk-2018-0004.

Hiebert, Janet L. “The Charter, Policy, and Political Judgment.” In Policy Change, Courts, and the Canadian Constitution, edited by Emmett Macfarlane. University of Toronto Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487519483-006.

Huda, Ni’matul, Idul Rishan, and Dian Kus Pratiwi. “Fast-Track Legislation: The Transformation of Law-Making Under Joko Widodo’s Administration.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2024): 117. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061.

Ikhsan, Edy. “The Omnibus Law in Indonesia: Assessing Its Consequences on Environmental Sustainability and Land Rights.” Journal of Human Security 18, no. 2 (2022): 47–53.

Irwansyah, Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media, 2020.

J. Kotzé, Louis. “The Transnationalization of Environmental Constitutionalism.” In Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law, edited by Veerle Heyvaert and Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119634.00020.

Kaharuddin, Kaharuddin, Dinar Karunia, Oemar Moechthar, and Ave Maria Frisa Katherina. “Omnibus Law In The Dynamics Of Constitutional Law: A Comparative Research Of Indonesia, The United States, The Philippines, And Canada.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v6i1.4054.

Kirchhoff, Denis, and Leonard J. S. Tsuji. “Reading Between the Lines of the ‘Responsible Resource Development’ Rhetoric: The Use of Omnibus Bills to ‘Streamline’ Canadian Environmental Legislation.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 32, no. 2 (2014): 108–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.894673.

Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora. “Implikasi Omnibus Law Terhadap Hak Konstitusional Atas Lingkungan Hidup Yang Sehat.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (2021): 195–218. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1819.

Mariyam, Siti, Adhi Putra Satria, Hariyanto Hariyanto, and Ahmad Masum. “Safeguarding Personal Data in Indonesian E-Commerce from a Constitutional Rights Perspective.” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2025): 683–711. https://doi.org/10.22437/x5q9y093.

Mattei, Julia. “Constitutional Tension Between Environmental Protection and Economic Order in Germany and in Brazil.” Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental 10, no. 2 (2019): 108. https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v10i2.23667.

Najib, Ahmad Ainun, and Retno Saraswati. “Omnibus Law on Job Creation: Tug of War over Environmental Protection Authority Amid the Climate Crisis.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1270, no. 1 (2023): 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1270/1/012004.

Nggilu, Novendri M., Wahidullah, Novi Noviawati, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Identity: A Comparative Study of Islamic Constitutionalism.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 2 (2024): 480–500.

Nggilu, Novendri M., Zulkifli Zulkifli, Yassine Chami, Indra Perwira, and Ali Abdurahman. “The Absence of Judicial Review on Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia: Urgency and Legal Reform for Constitutional Safeguards.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 2 (2025): 659–92. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.20888.

Niedobitek, Matthias. “The German Bundesrat and Executive Federalism.” Perspectives on Federalism 10, no. 2 (2018): 198–214. https://doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0023.

Özcan, Abdullah Sait, and Fırat Kimya. “Executive Decrees, Omnibus Bills, and the Politics of Abusive Constitutionalism in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 24, no. 4 (2024): 881–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2231678.

Purwanto, Muhammad Eko, and Efridani Lubis. “Yudicial Review Omnibus Law Dalam Melindungi Pekerja Dan Mengembangkan Investasi Di Indonesia.” VERITAS 8, no. 1 (2022): 49–66. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i1.1757.

Putera, Prakoso Bhairawa, Ida Widianingsih, Sinta Ningrum, Suryanto, and Yan Rianto. “Regulatory Amendments of The Strategic Policy for The Job Creation in Indonesia: Research and Innovation Aspect.” ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for Development 39, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.735.

Rahman, Arif, Ahmad Zaini, Hajani Hajani, Rendi Haerudin, and Ahmad Jamaludin Jambunanda. “Constitutional Transition in a Democratic State: A Critical View of the Omnibus Law Establishing Employment Copyright Law.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.1552.

Ridlwan, Zulkarnain, Budiyono Budiyono, Muhammad Akib, F.X. Sumarja, and Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah. “Curbing Elitist Populism in Lawmaking: A Constitutional Law Perspective.” Lex Scientia Law Review 9, no. 2 (2025): 1260–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i2.27909.

Röhner, Cara. “Practices of Social Constitutionalism: Poverty, Socio-Economic Status and Social Exclusion in the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court.” German Law Journal 26, no. 2 (2025): 213–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2025.4.

Rohtash, and Devinder Singh. “Constitutional Welfare Economics: A Study of Classical and Keynesian Economic Ideas in Indian Constitutional Economic Philosophy.” In Law, Economy, and Society: Insights into Legal and Economic Issues in India, edited by Ashish Virk, Aman Amrit Cheema, and Pooja Sikka. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer Nature Singapore, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-3361-9_6.

Sanders, Anna, Josi Khatarina, Rifqi Assegaf, Tessa Toumbourou, Heni Kurniasih, and Reni Suwarso. “The Omnibus Law on Job Creation and Its Potential Implications for Rural Youth and Future Farming in Indonesia.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 65, no. 2 (2024): 248–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12408.

Saputra, Rahmat, and Rama Dhianty. “Investment Licensing and Environmental Sustainability in the Perspective of Law Number 11 The Year 2020 Concerning Job Creation.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2472.

Saputra, Rian, M. Zaid, and Devi Triasari. “Executability of the Constitutional Court’s Formal Testing Decision: Indonesia’s Omnibus Law Review.” Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice 1, no. 3 (2023): 244–58. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i3.18.

Saurer, Johannes. “Between Industrial Society and the Anthropocene - On the Development of Environmental Constitutional Law in 75 Years of the Basic Law.” Die Verwaltung 57, no. 3 (2024): 251–78. https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.2024.382424.

Siagian, Abdul Hakim. “Omnibus Law Draft in the Perspective of Constitutionality and Legal Politics.” Jambura Law Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i1.7222.

Sisinaru, Sostones Y., and Susi Dwi Harijanti. “The Constitutionality of Outsourcing Job Regulation in the Law on Job Creation.” LAW REFORM 18, no. 1 (2022): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44249.

Soeprapto, R. Wahjoe Poernomo. “Meaningful Participation Through Online Channels in Legislation Making in Indonesia via Dpr.Go.Id Page.” Trunojoyo Law Review 6, no. 2 (2024): 189–210. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v6i2.25960.

Sommermann, Karl-Peter. “Constitutional State and Public Administration.” In Public Administration in Germany, edited by Sabine Kuhlmann, Isabella Proeller, Dieter Schimanke, and Jan Ziekow. Governance and Public Management. Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_2.

Steinebach, Stefanie, and Yvonne Kunz. “Separating Sisters From Brothers: Ethnic Relations and Identity Politics in the Context of Indigenous Land Titling in Indonesia.” Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies Vol 10 No 1 (June 2017): 47-64 Pages. 47-64 Pages. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2017.1-4.

Sulastri, Dewi, and Abu Sanmas. “The Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator: Implications of Decisions on the Principle of Checks and Balances in Indonesia.” LITIGASI 26, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.21999.

Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian, Mustafa Lutfi, and Kurniasih Bahagiati. “STRENGTHENING INDONESIA’S GREEN INVESTMENT LAW: Legal Reconceptualisation toward Net-Zero Emissions under Green Constitution and Maslahah.” Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah 16, no. 2 (2025): 411–51. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v16i2.35169.

Theil, Stefan. “Cautious Scrutiny: The Federal Climate Change Act Case in the German Constitutional Court.” The Modern Law Review 86, no. 1 (2023): 263–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12746.

Völlm, Birgit. “Germany.” In Global Perspectives in Forensic Psychiatry, 1st ed., by Gary Chaimowitz, Mini Mamak, Heather Moulden, and Drew Kingston. Routledge, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376248-12.

Weber, Albrecht. “Limitation and Derogation of Fundamental Rights.” In Writing Constitutions, edited by Wolfgang Babeck and Albrecht Weber. Springer International Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39622-9_17.

Weiss, Manfred. “Fundamental Rights and German Labor Law.” In Research Handbook on Labour, Business and Human Rights Law, edited by Janice R. Bellace and Beryl Ter Haar. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433114.00010.

Widodo, Hananto, Intan Lovisonnya, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo, and Uzodinma Yurriens Ezenduka. “Balancing National Constitutions and International Trade Commitments: Comparative Insights from Indonesia, Thailand, and India.” Lampung Journal of International Law 7, no. 2 (2026): 103–18. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4813.

Wolf, Joachim. “The Principle of Proportionality – the Centrepiece of the System of Constitutionally Compliant Executive Performance of State Tasks.” Zeitschrift Für Europarechtliche Studien 28, no. 4 (2025): 639–59. https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2025-4-639.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i2.37610

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:

2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia

Tel. +62-812-1356-9044; +62-822-9329-6045 (SMS/WA)

E-mail: [email protected]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS.

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

Username
Password
Remember me