Focus and Scope

In the Jambura Arena Sport Focus and Scope in the Sports Sector
Sports Science,
Sports Training,
Sports Education.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

JAS : Research Journal publishes articles following JAS guidelines and templates. Pre-review of the manuscript is carried out by the editorial team to review the suitability of the text with the focus and scope as well as the journal style and JAS writing guidelines. All submitted manuscripts will go through a double-blind review process. Manuscripts will be sent to a minimum of two reviewers based on their field of interest. Reviewers provide an assessment of the manuscript that includes originality, scientific contribution, and clarity of presentation. Based on comments and suggestions from the reviewer, the editorial board makes decisions on the reviewer's comments and suggestions. JAS has four types of decisions including accepted, accepted with minor revisions, accepted with major revisions, and rejected. Plagiarism checking is carried out using Turnitin software.

Publication Frequency

JAS is scheduled to be published in March, July and November (3 issues a year). Published electronically via the journal website (https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JAS/indexv). Each publication number (issue) has a minimum of 5 (five) titles and published articles will be given a DOI (digital object identifier).

Open Access Policy

The journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global exchange of knowledge. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, allowing any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full text of this article, crawl it for indexing, submit it as data to software, or use it for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical obstacles other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only restrictions on reproduction and distribution, and the only role of copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

JAS: Jambura Arena Sport is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Department of Physical Education Health Recreation, Gorontalo State University. This journal is available in print and online and strictly upholds publication ethics and avoids all types of plagiarism. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the author, editor-in-chief, editorial board, peer-reviewers and publisher (Recreational Health Physical Education). This statement is based on the COPE Best Practices Guidelines for Journal Editors. Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines. The publication of an article in a JAS peer-reviewed journal is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public. Physical Education Health Recreation as the publisher of JAS takes its duty of care over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize ethical behavior and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Physical Education Health Recreation and Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and/or publishers if this is useful and necessary. publication decision.

The editor of JAS : Jambura Arena Sport is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. Validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Fair play. Editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Confidentiality. Editors and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Reviewer Duties Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors in improving papers. Speed. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review is not possible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. Confidentiality. Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor. Objectivity Standards. The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Source Acknowledgment. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been reported previously should be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should also draw the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or relationships with any authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper. Author Duties Reporting standards. The author of an original research report must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be presented accurately in the paper. The paper should contain enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior. Data Access and Retention. Authors are requested to provide raw data in connection with the paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (in accordance with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if possible, and in any case should be prepared to store the data for a reasonable time after publication. Originality and Plagiarism. Authors should ensure that they have written completely original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others that these have been appropriately cited or cited. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication. An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior. Source Acknowledgment. Proper recognition of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the work reported. Paper Writing. Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported study. All persons who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are listed in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have approved its submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published work. When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper. =====================

Joni Taufik Hidayat, M.Pd

Editor-in-Chief, JAS : Jambura Arena Sport

Indexing

Articles published in JAS : Jambura Arena Sport (JAS, P-ISSN: 3047-1915, E-ISSN: 3047-1850) have appeared in the following indexes :Google Scholar, Crossref, Dimension, Base, Garuda, Onesearch

Plagiarism Screening Policy

JAS : The editorial board of Jambura Arena Sport recognizes that plagiarism is unacceptable and has therefore established the following policy stating specific measures (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in JAS. JAS will use Turnitin originality checking software as a tool to detect similarities in text in the article manuscript and the final version of the article ready for publication. A maximum of 20% similarity is allowed for submitted papers. If we find more than 20% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission. Definition: Plagiarism involves “the use or close imitation of another author's language and thoughts and the representation of them as one's own original work.” Policy: Papers must be original, unpublished, and not awaiting publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source. Any amount of text exceeding fair use standards (here defined as more than two or three sentences or equivalent) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, where applicable, the original author and also requires source identification; for example, previous publications. When plagiarism is identified, the Editor-in-Chief is responsible for reviewing this paper and will agree on measures according to the level of plagiarism detected in the paper according to the following guidelines: Plagiarism Level Minor Plagiarism A small sentence or short paragraph from another manuscript is plagiarized without significant data or ideas taken from other papers or publications. Penalty: A warning is given to the author and a request to amend the manuscript and properly cite the original source. Medium Plagiarism Significant data, paragraphs, or sentences from an article are plagiarized without proper citation to the original source. Penalty: Submitted articles are automatically rejected. Heavy Plagiarism Most articles are plagiarized involving many aspects such as reproducing original results (data, formulations, equations, laws, statements, etc.), ideas and methods presented in other publications.

Penalty: The paper is automatically rejected and the author is prohibited from submitting further articles to the JAS journal.