METODE ADAPTASI LINTAS BUDAYA INSTRUMEN KIDSCREEN-27 DI ASIA: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

Dewi Utari, Ratna Lestari

Abstract


Adaptasi lintas budaya merupakan konsep dimana sebuah instrumen dari bahasa original dikembangkan dalam bahasa lain. Proses pengembangan ini tidak hanya berfokus pada bahasanya saja namun meliputi aspek budaya, sehingga diperlukan metodologi yang jelas untuk menjamin tingkat kepercayaan dari instrumen yang dialihbahasakan. Kebaruan penelitian ini karena peneliti ingin melihat proses adaptasi lintas budaya dari instrumen Kidscreen-27 di Asia. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk melihat proses adaptasi lintas budaya dari instrumen Kidscreen di Asia menggunakan integrative review. Instrumen Kidscreen merupakan instrumen yang mengukur kualitas hidup pada anak dengan rentang usia 8 – 18 tahun. Instrumen dikembangkan mulai dari 52 item, 27, item dan 10 item. Adaptasi Kidscreen di Asia yang dicari yaitu mulai tahun 2015 – 2020. Pencarian dilakukan di Google scholar, Proquest, dan Ebsco dengan kata kunci kidscreen dan adaptasi lintas budaya. Sebanyak 5 artikel tentang kidscreen 27 yang dianalisis telah didapatkan dari hasil screening kelengkapan artikel, adanya duplikasi, dan jenis dari Kidscreen. Masing-masing artikel diidentifikasi berdasarkan tahapan proses adaptasi dan pendekatan metodologi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa semua studi sudah mengaplikasikan framework dengan pendekatan yang universal. Terdapat 2 instrumen yang mengadopsi konsep dari Beaton sebagai kerangka metodologi, sementara 3 lainnya menggunakan kerangka baku dari Kidscreen Group dalam proses adaptasinya.  Poin penekanan terdapat pada perincian prosedur yang diadopsi dalam proses, validasi konten dan evaluasi psikometri. Evaluasi psikometri perlu dilakukan sebagai pembuktian dengan tingkat kepercayaan yang diakui. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan dan persamaan dalam evaluasi psikometri tidak menjadikan salah satu hasil penelitian buruk atau tidak sesuai.


Keywords


Adaptasi Lintas Budaya; Integrative Review; Kidscreen.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wallander JL, Koot HM. Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions. Clin Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2016 Apr;45:131–43. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272735815300854

Jafari P, Stevanovic D, Bagheri Z. Cross-cultural Measurement Equivalence of the KINDL Questionnaire for Quality of Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev [Internet]. 2016 Apr 17;47(2):291–304. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10578-015-0568-5

Ravens-Sieberer U, Herdman M, Devine J, Otto C, Bullinger M, Rose M, et al. The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2014 Apr 18;23(3):791–803. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3

Desai AD, Zhou C, Stanford S, Haaland W, Varni JW, Mangione-Smith RM. Validity and Responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1;168(12):1114. Available from: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1600

Fiorin H, Lopes AB, Simone R, Moreira L, Filho BL, Regina E, et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Quality of Life Instrument: Sistematic Review Method. Int J Dev Res. 2018;08(04):19853–8.

Vélez C-M, Lugo-Agudelo L-H, Hernández-Herrera G-N, García-García H-I. Colombian Rasch validation of KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2016 Dec 4;14(1):67. Available from: http://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-016-0472-0

Baydur H, Ergin D, Gerçeklioğlu G, Eser E. Reliability and validity study of the KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire in a Turkish child/adolescent population. Anadolu Psikiyatr Derg. 2016;17(6):496–505.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2000 Dec;25(24):3186–91. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00007632-200012150-00014

Dela C, Gross J. An Integrative Literature Review Framework for Postgraduate Nursing Research Reviews. Eur J Res Med Sci [Internet]. 2017;5(1):7–15. Available from: www.idpublications.org

Torraco RJ. Writing Integrative Reviews of the Literature. Int J Adult Vocat Educ Technol. 2016;7(3):62–70.

Ng JYY, Burnett A, Ha AS, Sum KW. Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) versions of the KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2015 Oct 11;24(10):2415–21. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11136-015-0973-z

Nezu S, Iwasaka H, Saeki K, Obayashi K, Ishizuka R, Goma H, et al. Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of KIDSCREEN-27 and KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaires. Environ Health Prev Med [Internet]. 2016 May 16;21(3):154–63. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12199-016-0510-x

Power R, Akhter R, Muhit M, Wadud S, Heanoy E, Karim T, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Bengali version KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2019 Dec 15;19(1):19. Available from: https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-018-1373-7

Utari D, Lestari R. Adaptasi Dan Validasi Instrumen KIDSCREEN-27 Versi Bahasa Indonesia. Wind Heal J Kesehat. 2020;3(2):176–85.

Lino CR de M, Brüggemann OM, Souza M de L de, Barbosa S de FF, Santos EKA dos. The Cross-Cultural Adaptation Of Research Instruments, Conducted By Nurses In Brazil: An Integrative Review. Texto Context - Enferm [Internet]. 2018 Jan 8;26(4). Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072017000400503&lng=pt&tlng=pt

Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci [Internet]. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165–78. Available from: http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/JCS/Abstract/JCS_71_20150531131629

Orcan F. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Which One to Use First? Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Derg [Internet]. 2018 Dec 31;414–21. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.21031/epod.394323

Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2011 Apr;17(2):268–74. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med [Internet]. 2016 Jun;15(2):155–63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1556370716000158

Taber KS. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res Sci Educ [Internet]. 2018 Dec 7;48(6):1273–96. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35971/jjhsr.v5i2.18195

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Licence
 

 

Jambura Journal of Health Sciences and Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

</p