Integrasi Best Worst Method dan MOORA dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Orientasi Karir Siswa SMK

Nur Alim M. Suma, Lillyan Hadjaratie, Nikmasari Pakaya, Indhitya R. Padiku

Abstract


The career orientation process in vocational high schools was frequently constrained by student confusion and teacher subjectivity due to the absence of analytical guidelines. This study developed a decision support system to provide objective career recommendations. The main contribution of this research was the provision of an early-stage analytical guideline based on mathematical computation for students. The system development utilized the Waterfall method. For computation, the Best Worst Method (BWM) was used to calculate criteria weights based on expert preferences, which was combined with Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) to rank alternatives. The computation results of the BWM vector successfully achieved a consistency ratio of 0.0468. The confusion matrix testing on 30 samples indicated an accuracy rate of 86.67% and the System Usability Scale (SUS) evaluation obtained a score of 72.2 (Acceptable). However, this study is limited by the small sample size and implementation scope within a single school. These findings indicate that the integration of BWM and MOORA can be used as an initial analytical guideline to support career guidance services in vocational high schools.

Proses penentuan orientasi karir di SMK sering terkendala kebingungan siswa dan subjektivitas guru akibat ketiadaan pedoman analitis. Penelitian ini mengembangkan sistem pendukung keputusan untuk memberikan rekomendasi karir secara objektif. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini adalah penyediaan pedoman analitis awal berbasis komputasi matematis bagi siswa. Pengembangan sistem menggunakan metode Waterfall. Untuk komputasi, metode Best Worst Method (BWM) digunakan untuk menghitung bobot kriteria berdasarkan preferensi pakar, yang dipadukan dengan Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) untuk merangking alternatif. Hasil komputasi vektor BWM sukses mencapai rasio konsistensi 0,0468. Pengujian confusion matrix pada 30 sampel menunjukkan tingkat akurasi 86,67% dan evaluasi System Usability Scale (SUS) memperoleh skor 72,2 (Acceptable). Meskipun demikian, penelitian ini memiliki keterbatasan pada ukuran sampel yang kecil dan cakupan implementasi yang masih terbatas di satu sekolah. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa integrasi BWM dan MOORA dapat digunakan sebagai pedoman analitis awal dalam mendukung layanan bimbingan karir di SMK.

Keywords


Best Worst Method; Orientasi Karir; Sistem Pendukung Keputusan; MOORA; Kebergunaan.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-fajri, W. B., Nugraheni, D. M. K., & Surarso, B. (2023). Penggabungan Best Worst Method, Moora Dan Copeland Score Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Pada Dinas Sosial. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 10(3), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2023106724

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2025. https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2025/05/05/2432/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-4-76-persen--rata-rata-upah-buruh-sebesar-3-09-juta-rupiah-.html

Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445–469.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis.

Ceballos, B., Lamata, M. T., & Pelta, D. A. (2016). A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-016-0093-1

García-cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2012). On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56(5–6), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022

Gultom, H., & Isnanto, M. H. (2024). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Pegawai Penerima Promosi Jabatan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dan Weighted Product. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 5(2), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v5i2.4801

Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. In Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-61819-5

Handini, B. K., & Kurniawan, H. (2023). Penerapan Metode AHP dan Metode MOORA Dalam Penentuan Lokasi Investasi Properti Pada PT.Safa Marwah Bersama. Jurnal JUREKSI (Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem), 1(1).

Indrasari, H., Marguin, & Hadianti, N. (2022). Bimbingan dan Konseling Karir Pada Perencanaan Karir Siswa Kelas XII Smk Negeri 1 Nanga Pinoh. JUWARA: Jurnal Wawasan Dan Aksara, 2(2), 124–135.

Katili, M. Z., Amali, L. N., & Tuloli, M. S. (2021). Implementasi Metode AHP-TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pendukung Rekomendasi Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jambura Journal of Informatics, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37905/jji.v2i2.10246

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

Ly, D., Overeem, M., Brinkkemper, S., & Dalpiaz, F. (2025). The Power of Words in Agile vs. Waterfall Development: Written Communication in Hybrid Software Teams. The Journal of Systems & Software, 219(October 2024), 112243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112243

Mokhtar, R., & Khayyat, M. (2022). A Comparative Case Study of Waterfall and Agile Management. SAR Journal, 5(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.18421/SAR51

Natsir, F., Izzatilah, M., & Marsiani, E. S. (2025). Penerapan Metode Moora Dalam Keputusan Pemilihan Produk Layak Produksi Terbaik. STRING (Satuan Tulisan Riset Dan Inovasi Teknologi), 9(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/string.v9i3.28708

Oktria, I., & Novandya, A. (2026). Analisis Usability Fitur Shopee Affiliate Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (SUS). Jurnal Teknik dan Science, 5(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56127/jts.v5i1.2585

Pratama, R., Tugiono, & Elfitriani. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pupuk Buah Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode MOORA. Jurnal Sistem Informasi TGD, 2(4), 518–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53513/jursi.v2i4.5362

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (United Kingdom), 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega (United Kingdom), 64, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001

Sihombing, D. O. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Konsentrasi Mata Kuliah dengan Metode MOORA. Journal of Computer System and Informatics, 5(4), 942–956. https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v5i4.5780

Sommerville, I. (2011). Software Engineering (Ninth Edition). Addison-Wesley.

Suharsono, & Kurniati, Y. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Jurusan Menggunakan Metode MOORA. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi (JTI), 2(1), 1–8. http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/JTI/article/view/7340/3838

Sunarya, P. A., Rahardja, U., Santoso, N. P. L., Mulyati, Mustofa, K. I., & Bennet, D. (2025). Pengaruh Metode Waterfall dalam Penyempurnaan Proses Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Akademik secara Sistematis. Technomedia Journal (TMJ), 9(3), 360–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33050/tmj.v9i3.2421

Super, D. E. (1980). A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1

Suraya, D., Prasetyo, D. Y., & Ilyas. (2023). Sistem Informasi Geografis Pemetaan Hotel dan Wisma Berbasis Web di Kota Tembilahan. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Sistem Komputer, 8(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51717/simkom.v8i2.138

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jji.v8i1.38415

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.