Investigasi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Kategori Adversity Quotient pada Siswa Kelas XII

Dewi Rosikhoh; Adin Lazuardy Firdiansyah; Riskiyatul Hasanah

doi:10.37905/jmathedu.v4i2.20302

Investigasi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Kategori Adversity Quotient pada Siswa Kelas XII

Dewi Rosikhoh, Adin Lazuardy Firdiansyah, Riskiyatul Hasanah

Abstract

In this manuscript, our research purpose was to describe how high school students solved geometry problems in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This research was qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were five students in grade 12 science divided into one climber student, one camper-climber student, two camper students, and one quitter-camper student. In this research, we used some instruments, namely the ARP questionnaire, problem-solving test questions, and interview guidelines. The qualitative data were analyzed by using the principles or steps of the Polya method in solving problems. The results showed that the climber and camper-climber students could understand the problem, make plans, carry out plans, and check back in solving the geometry problems. However, the camper-climber student in re-checking answers had not been equipped with other strategies or methods. The camper student could understand the problem, make plans, and carry out plans in solving the problems. It was just that the camper student making plans was not more complex than the plans made by the climber student. Meanwhile, the quitter-camper student could only understand the problem. Therefore, AQ categories of students could be used as one of the teacher considerations in forming groups when learning mathematics in class, especially in trying students’ problem-solving skills.

Keywords

Adversity Quotient; Mathematical Problem Solving; Grade XII

Full Text:

PDF

References

M. Stadler, K. Herborn, M. Mustafić, and S. Greiff, “The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: An investigation of the validity of the PISA 2015 CPS tasks,” Comput. Educ., vol. 157, no. July, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103964.

S. Greiff, S. Wüstenberg, and F. Avvisati, “Computer-generated log-file analyses as a window into students’ minds? A showcase study based on the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving,” Comput. Educ., vol. 91, pp. 92–105, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.018.

S. A. Hasibuan, K. M. A. Fauzi, and M. Mukhtar, “Development of PISA Mathematical Problem Model on the Content of Change and Relationship to Measure Students Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iejme/6274.

C. W. Suryaningrum, Purwanto, Subanji, H. Susanto, Y. D. W. K. Ningtyas, and M. Irfan, “Semiotic reasoning emerges in constructing properties of a rectangle: A study of adversity quotient,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2020, doi: 10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110.

Stoltz and T. Hermaya, Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities (Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang). Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2000.

A. Safi’i et al., “The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510.

B. K. Suryapuspitarini and N. R. Dewi, “Problem Solving Ability Viewed From The Adversity Quotient on Mathematics Connected Mathematics Project Learning (Cmp) With Etnomathematics Nuanced Articles Info,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer.

L. D. Afri, “Hubungan Adversity Quotient Dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Smp Pada Pembelajaran Matematika,” AXIOM J. Pendidik. dan Mat., vol. 7, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.30821/axiom.v7i2.2895.

I. Rukmana, M. Hasbi, and B. Paloloang, “Hubungan adversity quotient dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri Model Terpadu Madani Palu,” J. Elektron. Pendidik. Mat. Tadulako, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325–333, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JEPMT/article/view/7220.

N. Septianingtyas and H. Jusra, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 657–672, 2020, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263.

M. Nurwahid, H. Permadi, and H. Susanto, “Investigating mathematical problem solving of elementary students on cube and block material in terms of adversity quotient,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 040014, no. January, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0112738 Published.

T. Febrianti, N. E. Zakiah, and A. M. Ruswana, “Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Smp Pada Materi Lingkaran Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (Aq),” J-KIP (Jurnal Kegur. dan Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 3, no. 2, p. 420, 2022, doi: 10.25157/j-kip.v3i2.6569.

S. S. Abdiyani, S. Khabibah, and N. D. Rahmawati, “Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient,” Al-Khwarizmi J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2019, doi: 10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774.

M. Naimnule, Kartono, and M. Asikin, “Mathematics Problem Solving Ability in Terms of Adversity Quotient in Problem Based Learning Model With Peer Feedback,” Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer.

S. N. Istiqomah and H. Suyitno, “Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of 8 th Grade Students in Terms of Adversity Quotient in Discovery Learning,” Unnes J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 144–154, 2021, doi: 10.15294/ujme.v10i2.31699.

Baharullah, Wahyuddin, M. R. Usman, and N. Syam, “Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ),” J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1039–1051, 2022, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766.

L. N. Chabibah, E. Siswanah, and D. F. Tsani, “Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient,” Pythagoras J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2019, doi: 10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024.

N. N. Aini and M. Mukhlis, “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Polya Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient,” Alifmatika J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 105–128, 2020, doi: 10.35316/alifmatika.2020.v2i1.105-128.

A. P. Yanti and M. Syazali, “Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2016, doi: 10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.132.

A. Nada, M. Prayito, and L. Harun, “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA Kelas XI Menurut Langkah-Langkah John Dewey Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Campers,” Imajiner J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 2020, doi: 10.26877/imajiner.v2i2.5775.

R. Damayanti, “Profil Metakognisi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Segiempat Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ),” Universitas Jember, 2019.

E. N. Sahidah, “Analisis pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah-langkah Polya dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita materi SPLDV kelas VIII di MTsN 1 Blitar tahun akademik 2018/2019,” UIN SATU Tulungagung, 2019.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative data Analysis, 3rd ed. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.

H. Pratikno and E. Retnowati, “How Indonesian Students Use the Polya’s General Problem Solving Steps,” Southeast Asian Math. Educ. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2018, doi: 10.46517/seamej.v8i1.62.

Y. Yustiana, T. A. Kusmayadi, and L. Fitriana, “Mathematical problem solving ability of vocational high school students based on adversity quotient,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012092.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jmathedu.v4i2.20302