Author Guidelines
A. Manuscript Submission
Euler: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi is a peer-reviewed, open-access scientific journal publishing original research and critical scholarly reviews in mathematics, applied mathematics, statistics and probability, mathematics education, computational mathematics, computer science, artificial intelligence, optimization, and related fields of science and technology.
Submitted manuscripts must demonstrate scientific originality, methodological rigor, analytical depth, and meaningful scholarly contributions.
Euler accepts Original Research Articles and Review Articles authored by at least two individuals. All authors must meet the journal's authorship criteria. Single-authored manuscripts are not accepted, and adding authors solely to meet the minimum authorship requirement is prohibited.
Manuscripts must be submitted through the journal's Online Submission System.
By submitting a manuscript, the authors confirm that:
The manuscript is original and is not simultaneously under consideration by another journal.
Relevant preprints, theses, dissertations, conference papers, or related publications have been appropriately disclosed and acknowledged.
All authors have made genuine scholarly contributions, approved the manuscript, and agreed to its submission.
The research complies with applicable scientific, ethical, and intellectual property requirements.
The manuscript follows the journal's official template and Author Guidelines.
Research findings, data, methods, citations, and supporting materials are accurately reported.
Relevant funding, conflicts of interest, author contributions, data availability, and substantive generative AI use have been appropriately declared.
Manuscripts failing essential scientific, ethical, or editorial requirements may be returned for correction or rejected during initial screening.
B. Reviewing of Manuscripts
Euler implements a double-blind peer review process, in which authors' and reviewers' identities are concealed from each other.
All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Suitable manuscripts are evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant scientific expertise. Additional reviewers may be appointed when necessary.
Reviewers assess novelty, methodological validity, analytical depth, mathematical or scientific rigor, reliability of findings, scholarly contribution, and compliance with publication ethics.
Each evaluation criterion is assessed using three qualitative statuses:
Meets Standard
Revision Needed
Does Not Meet Standard
Reviewers provide one of four recommendations:
Accept for Publication.
Minor Revision.
Major Revision.
Reject.
Authors invited to revise must submit a revised manuscript and a point-by-point response to reviewer comments. Further review may be conducted when necessary.
Reviewer recommendations are advisory. Final decisions are made independently by the Editor-in-Chief or an authorized editor based on scientific merit and publication ethics.
Review requirements must be appropriate to the research design. Numerical simulations are not mandatory for purely theoretical studies when rigorous mathematical proofs adequately establish the principal findings.
C. Manuscript Preparation and Format
1. Language Requirements
English is the official language of publication beginning with the December 2026 issue.
Manuscripts may be submitted in English or Bahasa Indonesia and undergo editorial screening and peer review in their original language. However, manuscripts accepted for publication in the December 2026 issue and subsequent issues must be available in English before publication.
Authors submitting manuscripts in Bahasa Indonesia may choose:
Journal-Coordinated Translation: Translation arranged through Euler for IDR 250,000 per manuscript.
Independent Professional Translation: Authors may arrange translation independently, accompanied by a certificate from an officially recognized translation institution or certified translation service provider. No Euler translation fee applies.
Authors remain responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the translated scientific content, mathematical formulations, findings, and conclusions.
2. Manuscript Template
Manuscripts must follow the official Euler manuscript template and its prescribed formatting requirements.
The journal provides an official DOCX template. Authors may also use the official LaTeX template where provided by the journal.
Manuscripts must use consistent formatting for headings, equations, mathematical notation, tables, figures, citations, and references.
3. General Requirements and Supporting Documents
Authors must ensure that:
Mathematical expressions, scientific terminology, variables, and assumptions are correctly defined.
Tables, figures, graphs, and supporting materials are accurate, readable, and appropriately cited.
References follow the IEEE referencing style.
The manuscript is scientifically coherent and has been carefully proofread.
An appropriate proofreading certificate and a Turnitin Similarity Report are submitted as supplementary files, in accordance with the journal's submission requirements.
Euler applies an overall Similarity Index below 25%, excluding citations and references, as a general screening requirement. The similarity percentage is subject to editorial interpretation and does not independently establish plagiarism or manuscript acceptability.
Authors must also provide the details of three prospective reviewers, including at least one affiliated with an institution outside Indonesia, as required by the Submission Preparation Checklist. Suggested reviewers must possess relevant expertise and have no conflicts of interest with the authors. Their appointment remains entirely at the editor's discretion.
4. Manuscript Anonymization
Authors must prepare an anonymized manuscript for double-blind peer review.
The review file must not include author names, affiliations, email addresses, identifying acknowledgments, or identifying document metadata.
Complete author details must be entered separately in the submission metadata or designated title page.
D. Manuscript Structure and Scientific Content
Original Research Articles should generally contain:
Title, Author Information, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods or Mathematical Model, Results and Discussion, Conclusions, AI Use Declaration, Author Contributions, Acknowledgments (optional), Funding, Data Availability, Conflicts of Interest, and References.
The structure may be adapted for theoretical research or Review Articles when scientifically justified and consistent with the official template.
1. Title
The title must be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the manuscript's main scientific problem, methods, or contributions.
Avoid unnecessary abbreviations, ambiguous expressions, and geographical references that are not essential to the research contribution.
2. Author Information
All authors must provide their full names without academic titles, institutional affiliations, city, postal code, country, and email addresses.
The corresponding author must be clearly identified.
Each manuscript must have at least two eligible authors, all of whom satisfy the journal's authorship criteria and approve the manuscript.
The corresponding author must ensure that all authors are accurately entered in the submission metadata. Subsequent authorship changes require editorial approval in accordance with the Authorship and Contributorship Policy.
3. Abstract and Keywords
The abstract must provide a concise and accurate overview of:
The research problem or background.
The principal objective.
The mathematical, scientific, statistical, or computational methods.
The main findings.
The conclusions and scientific contributions.
For Review Articles, the abstract must identify the review scope, analytical approach, principal synthesis, and contribution.
Abstracts must be provided in English and Bahasa Indonesia, in accordance with the journal's bilingual abstract requirement.
Authors must provide no more than six relevant keywords or key phrases using recognized scientific terminology.
4. Introduction
The Introduction must establish the scientific background, significance, state of the art, research gap, novelty, and research objectives.
Authors should:
Explain the importance of the research problem.
Critically review relevant previous studies.
Identify unresolved theoretical, methodological, computational, or empirical problems.
Clearly explain the manuscript's original scientific contribution.
State the objectives and their relationship to the research gap.
Novelty may arise from new theories, mathematical proofs, models, methods, algorithms, experimental findings, educational approaches, or scientifically significant applications.
Applying an established method to a different dataset or case study does not automatically establish sufficient novelty. Authors must demonstrate the significance of the resulting scientific contribution.
5. Methods or Mathematical Model
The methodology must be sufficiently described to establish scientific validity, rigor, and reproducibility.
A separate Methods section is not mandatory for purely theoretical studies when methodological explanations are appropriately integrated into mathematical formulations, definitions, theorems, and proofs.
Depending on the research design, authors must describe relevant:
Mathematical models, assumptions, variables, parameters, and analytical procedures.
Statistical models, data characteristics, estimation techniques, and validation procedures.
Computational algorithms, simulation settings, software, and verification methods.
Experimental designs, instruments, data collection procedures, and analytical approaches.
Research participants, sampling techniques, instrument validity, reliability, and ethical approval for relevant empirical or educational studies.
Methods must be appropriate to the research objectives and sufficiently transparent to permit meaningful scientific verification.
6. Results and Discussion
The Results and Discussion must present the principal findings systematically and critically explain their scientific significance.
Results may include mathematical theorems, proofs, analytical solutions, numerical simulations, statistical findings, computational experiments, educational research outcomes, or other relevant scientific evidence.
a. Scientific Findings
Present the main results clearly, using mathematical arguments, empirical evidence, tables, figures, or computational outputs where appropriate.
b. Analytical and Methodological Rigor
Mathematical and theoretical studies must provide valid analytical arguments and sufficiently rigorous proofs.
Computational studies must demonstrate appropriate algorithmic verification, numerical accuracy, or methodological validation.
Empirical and educational studies must use appropriate data analysis, valid measurement procedures, and scientifically justified interpretations.
c. Numerical and Computational Analysis
Where numerical simulations or computational experiments are conducted, authors should adequately describe the algorithms, parameters, simulation scenarios, validation procedures, and interpretation of findings.
Convergence, stability, accuracy, sensitivity, or error analyses should be provided when relevant to the research claims.
Numerical simulations are not required for theoretical studies when unnecessary to establish the results.
d. Critical Discussion
The discussion must:
Interpret the principal findings rather than merely describe them.
Explain their relationship to the research objectives.
Compare the findings with relevant previous studies.
Identify their theoretical, methodological, computational, or practical implications.
Discuss relevant limitations.
Demonstrate how the findings address the research gap.
The discussion must clearly establish the manuscript's scientific contribution.
7. Conclusions
Conclusions must directly address the research objectives and emphasize the principal findings and scientific contributions.
They must be supported by the results, avoid unsupported generalizations, and not introduce new findings.
Relevant limitations, implications, or recommendations for further research may be included when appropriate.
8. Declaration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use
Authors must disclose substantive generative AI use, identifying the tool and its specific purpose.
When AI contributes to research methods, analyses, or findings, its use must also be documented in the relevant methodological section.
Routine spelling correction, conventional grammar checking, reference management, and non-generative formatting tools generally do not require disclosure.
AI tools cannot be listed as authors. All AI-assisted scientific content must be independently verified by human authors.
Example when generative AI was used:
"The authors used [AI tool name and version, if available] for [specific purpose]. All AI-assisted content was independently reviewed and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the manuscript."
Example when generative AI was not used:
"The authors declare that no generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript."
9. Author Contributions
All manuscripts must include an Author Contributions Statement using relevant roles from the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT).
The 14 CRediT roles are:
Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing – original draft; and Writing – review and editing.
Example:
Author 1: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.
Author 2: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.
Author 3: Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing.
Each author must satisfy the journal's authorship criteria. CRediT roles describe individual contributions but do not independently establish authorship eligibility.
10. Acknowledgments
Authors may acknowledge individuals or institutions that provided academic, technical, administrative, language editing, translation, or other relevant assistance without meeting the criteria for authorship.
Acknowledgments must be accurate and concise. Permission should be obtained from individuals being acknowledged.
Authors should not routinely acknowledge editors or anonymous reviewers for performing their standard editorial responsibilities.
11. Funding
Authors must disclose relevant research funding, including the funding institution, grant number, and funders' roles where applicable.
When funding was received:
"This research was supported by [Funding Institution] under Grant Number [Grant Number]."
When no external funding was received:
"This research received no external funding."
12. Data Availability
All manuscripts must include a Data Availability Statement appropriate to the nature of the research.
For studies involving datasets, computational codes, experiments, or statistical analyses, authors must indicate whether supporting materials are publicly available, available upon reasonable request, or subject to justified restrictions.
Examples:
"The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request."
"The datasets and computational codes generated during this study are available at [Repository Name and Link]."
"No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable."
The final example may be appropriate for purely theoretical studies that do not generate or analyze datasets.
13. Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose relevant financial and non-financial interests that may influence or reasonably be perceived to influence the research.
When no conflicts exist:
"The authors declare no conflicts of interest."
When conflicts exist, their nature must be clearly described.
Funding and conflicts of interest must be disclosed separately.
14. Research Ethics and Intellectual Property
Research involving human participants, personal information, animals, or confidential data must comply with applicable ethical approval, informed consent, privacy, and legal requirements.
Where applicable, authors must provide the approving ethics committee's identity and approval information or explain any legitimate exemption.
Authors must also respect copyright, licensing conditions, and permissions for third-party materials.
15. References
References must be relevant, reliable, accurate, and sufficient to support the research problem, methods, scientific arguments, and findings.
All citations and references must follow the IEEE referencing style, with references numbered in order of first citation.
a. Reference Quantity and Composition
A bibliography containing at least 15 relevant references may serve as a general editorial guideline rather than an inflexible requirement.
Authors should prioritize primary scholarly sources, including relevant peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings.
The appropriate number and composition of references depend on the scientific discipline, study design, and manuscript type. There is no automatic rejection based solely on a fixed percentage of primary or secondary references.
b. Reference Currency
Relevant literature from the preceding five to ten years should be considered when appropriate.
Classical and foundational scientific literature remains acceptable when relevant. Manuscripts must not be rejected solely because they cite older foundational research.
c. Citation and Reference Accuracy
Authors must ensure that:
All citations correspond to complete reference entries.
Every reference listed is cited in the manuscript.
Authors, titles, publication years, journal details, and page ranges are accurate.
DOIs are included whenever available.
Original research sources are appropriately acknowledged.
Irrelevant or manipulative citations are avoided.
Reference management software such as Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote may be used.
d. Reference Formatting Examples
Journal Articles
[1] R. Resmawan, P. Sianturi, and E. H. Nugrahani, "The analysis of SEIRS-SEI epidemic models on malaria with regard to human recovery rate," Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 132–140, 2017, doi: 10.13170/aijst.6.3.9303.
[2] H. S. Panigoro, R. Resmawan, A. T. R. Sidik, N. Walangadi, A. Ismail, and C. Husuna, "A fractional-order predator-prey model with age structure on predator and nonlinear harvesting on prey," Jambura Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 355–366, 2022, doi: 10.34312/jjom.v4i2.15220.
Conference Proceeding
[3] A. Author and B. Author, "Paper title," in Proceedings of Conference Name, City, Country, Year, pp. xx–xx, doi: xx.xxxx/xxxxx.
Thesis or Dissertation
[4] A. Author, "Thesis or dissertation title," Master's thesis or Ph.D. dissertation, Department, University, City, Country, Year.
Book
[5] A. Author, Book Title, edition. City: Publisher, Year.
Website
[6] Organization or Author, "Page title," Website Name, Year. [Online]. Available: URL. [Accessed: Day-Month-Year].
Book Chapter
[7] P. van den Driessche and J. Watmough, "Further notes on the basic reproduction number," in Mathematical Epidemiology, F. Brauer, P. van den Driessche, and J. Wu, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, pp. 159–178, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-78911-6_6.
Authors should consult the official manuscript template for additional formatting requirements and reference examples.
