Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving HOTS Problems on Algebraic Materials Based on the Complexity Level of the Problem Based on Bloom's Theory

Yulia Muliana; Abdillah Abdillah; Mahsup Mahsup; Syaharuddin Syaharuddin; Abdul-Lateef Olamide Ahmodu; Mohammed Muniru Iddrisu

doi:10.37905/euler.v11i2.23053

Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving HOTS Problems on Algebraic Materials Based on the Complexity Level of the Problem Based on Bloom's Theory

Yulia Muliana, Abdillah Abdillah, Mahsup Mahsup, Syaharuddin Syaharuddin, Abdul-Lateef Olamide Ahmodu, Mohammed Muniru Iddrisu

Abstract

Mathematics discusses a lot about various kinds of problems that contain numbers that are classified as Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Math HOTS questions require a high level of thinking to solve the problem. Based on Bloom's theory, HOTS consists of analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). This study aims to determine the level of student errors in solving HOTS questions based on Bloom's theory. This research uses mixed method research, which is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, where the stages of this research include instrument development, instrument validation, data collection, data analysis and interpretation. The sample of this study used 25 students of class VIII junior high school in Mataram City. Researchers gave 10 essay questions that had been validated by material experts to students as research instruments. The results showed that students' understanding in solving HOTS problems was still lacking. For the error rate, it was found that there were no students who could solve the creating (C6) section with a percentage of 100% error, analyzing (C4) section with a percentage of 60%, evaluating (C5) 24%, applying (C3) 16%, understanding (C2) 12%, and in the remembering (C1) section there were no students who made mistakes with a percentage of 0% error. The biggest error was found in the creating part (C6), where the most mistakes were made by women with an average score of 50.55.

Keywords

HOTS; Student Error; Linear Equation Systems; Bloom Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. Lutfia, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Lingkaran,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 2021, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v1i1.2033.

A. Nurfarisi Sugiarto and M. Afrilianto, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Dengan Menggunakan Teori Polya,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1001–1008, 2021, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.1001-1008.

A. Abdillah, V. Mandailina, D. Pramita, and M. Mahsup, “Peningkatan kemampuan aritmatika untuk perhitungan cepat operasi aljabar siswa madrasah aliyah,” JMM (Jurnal Masy. Mandiri), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v4i2.1747.*

P. Pujilestari, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Sma Materi Operasi Aljabar Bentuk Pangkat Dan Akar,” Jisp, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 226–232, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v2i1.264.

W. Mahmudah, “Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Hots Type Math Problems Based on Newman’s Theory,” J. UJMC, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2018.

A. Fridanianti, H. Purwati, and Y. H. Murtianto, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aljabar Kelas Vii Smp N 2 Pangkah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Kognitif Impulsif,” AKSIOMA J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11, 2018, doi: 10.26877/aks.v9i1.2221.

W. Widyawati, D. Astuti, and R. Ijudin, “Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika,” J. Pendidik. Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1–8, 2018.

M. Mawaddah, A. Abdillah, S. Sirajuddin, and M. Mahsup, “Implementation Of Newman Method For Analyzing Student Errors In Solving Hots Type Math Problems,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2383–2395, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5334.

A. Anugrah and H. Pujiastuti, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v11i2.11897.

G. W. Mandini and H. Hartono, “Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal HOTS model TIMSS dan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah menengah pertama,” Pythagoras J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2018, doi: 10.21831/pg.v13i2.21234.

M. Forehand, “Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : Original and revised,” Emerg. Perspect. Learn. teaching, Technol., p. 12, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www4.edumoodle.at/gwk/pluginfile.php/109/mod_resource/content/5/forehand_bloomschetaxonomie02.pdf

S. R. Sobral, “Bloom’s taxonomy to improve teaching-learning in introduction to programming,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 148–153, 2021, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.3.1504.

B. S. Bloom and D. R. Krathwohl, “Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and univesity examiners,” Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. p. 10, 1956.

A. Kniley, “Bloom ’ s Taxonomy Bloom ’ s Taxonomy,” Polit. Soc., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2009.

P. N. Sagala and A. Andriani, “Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1188, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025.

D. Amalia and W. Hadi, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Hots Berdasarkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis,” Transform. J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 219–236, 2020, doi: 10.36526/tr.v4i1.904.

Q. Ayun, I. Wulandari, and K. Wibawa, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Hots Berdasarkan Prosedur Polya Pada Materi Aljabar,” J. Santiaji Pendidik. (JSP), vol. 12, no. 1, 2022.

C. Yuliana, S. Sanusi, and S. Maharani, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Kemampuan Siswa,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2019, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.36653/educatif.v1i1.3.

S. J. Sari and T. Yuwono, “Kesalahan Siswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson,” J. Tadris Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 219–228, 2020, doi: 10.21274/jtm.2020.3.2.219-228.

S. Azmia and S. Soro, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Ditinjau dari Taksonomi Solo pada Siswa,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2001–2009, 2021, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.681.

A. Rupaidah and A. Danaryanti, “Pengembangan LKS dengan Pendekatan Realistik pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel,” EDU-MAT J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2013, doi: 10.20527/edumat.v1i1.548.

A. Kamila, S. Nafisah, D. Aprilia, and B. G. Wicaksono, “Analisis kemampuan siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal hots matematika materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel,” ProSANDIKA UNIKAL (Prosiding Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Mat. Univ. Pekalongan), vol. 1, no. 22, pp. 119–126, 2020.

P. P. Sari and D. A. Lestari, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 04, no. 01, pp. 286–293, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i1.181.

V. Oktoviani, W. L. Widoyani, and F. Ferdianto, “Analisis kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMP pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel,” Edumatica J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2019, doi: 10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.6346.

M. F. Darus, A. I. Imami, and A. P. Abadi, “Analisis Soal dalam Buku Matematika Kelas VII Semester 1 Berdasarkan Kriteria dari Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots),” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 777–788, 2021, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.777-788.

N. S. Anngraini, H. Dewi, and D. S. Rahayu, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Analysis of Students ’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Relation and Function for Class Viii At Smpn 1,” JUPITEK J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol4iss2pp79-86.

W. Gumelar and M. Afrilianto, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1481–1488, 2021, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v4i6.1481-1488.

D. Agustiah, T. Fauzi, and E. Ramadhani, “Dampak Penggunaan Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Belajar Siswa,” Islam. Couns. J. Bimbing. Konseling Islam, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 181, 2020, doi: 10.29240/jbk.v4i2.1935.

N. Ahmad, R. Ilato, and B. R. Payu, “Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa,” Jambura Econ. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70–79, 2020, doi: 10.37479/jeej.v2i2.5464.

S. T. Hidayatuladkia, M. Kanzunnudin, and S. D. Ardianti, “Peran Orang Tua dalam Mengontrol Penggunaan Gadget pada Anak Usia 11 Tahun,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 363, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v5i3.38996.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/euler.v11i2.23053