Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries

Ahmad Wijaya, Nasran Nasran

Abstract


Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the comparative model of judicial review in Indonesia and other countries. This research uses normative legal research. The approaches used by researchers in compiling this research are, among others: the legal approach; historical approach; and comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that in principle the constitutional review system in several countries shows a variety of color gradations that are tailored to the needs of each country. In general, there are 3 (three) constitutionality testing mechanisms that have been developed to date, namely: First, the constitutionality testing of laws is carried out by existing judicial institutions or non-special adjudication, namely the Supreme Court. The country that adopts this system is the United States of America. Second, the constitutionality test of the law is carried out by a special judicial institution, namely the Constitutional Court. Countries that have adopted this system are Indonesia, Germany, South Korea, South Africa, Russia, Thailand and Turkey. The constitutionality of the law is examined by non-judicial institutions. The country that adopted this system is France.


Keywords


Judicial Review; Comparative Study.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, Ahmad, and Novendri M. Nggilu. "Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution." Jurnal Konstitusi 16.4 (2020).

Ahmadi, Konstitusional Review: Suatu Perbandingan Praktek Ketatanegaraan, Jurnal Al-Izzah, Volume, 9 (1), 2014.

Ali Marwan Hsb, “Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Neutralizer terhadap Lembaga Politik”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 2 (3), 2013, ,

Putusan Final Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hal Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 14 (3), 2011.

Abu Tamrin. “Perubahan Konstitusi dan Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia”, Jurnal Cita Hukum, Volume 3 (1), Juni (2015): 93

A. Mukti Arto. Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung, (Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001).

Albert P. Melon dan George Mace, Judicial review and American Democracy, (United States: Iowa State University Press).

Bahder Johan Nasution, Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Cet. Ke-V. (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2018).

Christina Murray. A Constitutional Beginning: Making South Africa's Mark Tushnet. Weak courts, strong rights: judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).

Daniek Okvita K. Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Skripsi (Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2010)

Fadhli Zulfahmi Nst dan Sufyan, Perbandingan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Judicial Review di Negara Republik Indonesia Dan Hungaria, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, Volume 2 (1), 2018.

Herman Schwartz, "The New Eastern European Constitutional Courts”, Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume. 13 (4).

Helmut Steinberger, “Historic Influences of American Constitutionalism upon German Constitutional Development: Federalism and Judicial Review”, Columbia Journal of Transnasional Law, Volume. 36 (1), 2008.

I Dewa Gede Palaguna. Pengaduan Konstitusional, mengutip dari Tom Ginsbug, Judicial Review in New Democracies. Constitutional Courts in Asian Countries, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

James West & Dae-Kyu Yoon. West, "The constitutional court of the republic of Korea: transforming the jurisprudence of the vortex?" The American Journal of Comparative Law 40.1 (1992).

Jerfi Uzman, Tom Barkhuysen, and Michiel L. van Emmerik. "The Dutch Supreme Court: A Reluctant Positive Legislator?" Netherlands Report to the Eighteenth International Congress of Comparative Law. 2010.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional Di Berbagai Negara (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005), ,

Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).

Jose Andre Soehalim, Pengembangan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penerapan Pengaduan Konstitusional di Indonesia, Lex Administratum, Volume 8 (1), 2020.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. "The Constitutional Court in Thailand: from activism to arbitrariness." Constitutional Courts in Asia (2018).

Mark Tushnet. Weak courts, strong rights: judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Moh. Mahfud MD, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011).

Nur Rohim Yunus, Reformasi Radikal Konstitusi Negara Rusia, ANDALAH: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, Volume 1 (2), 2017.

Rett R. Ludwikowski, “Fundamental Constitutional Rights in the New Constitutions of Eastern and Central Europe”, Cordozo Journal of International & Contemporary Law, Volume. 3 (1), 1995.

Riawan Tjandra, Teori dan Praktek Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, (Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2010).

Rodrigo González Quintero "Judicial review in the Republic of Korea: an introduction." Revista de Derecho 34 (2010).

Stephen Gardbaum, “The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism”, American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 49 (4), 2001.

Stacia L. Haynie, Structure and Context of Judicial Institutions in Democratizing Countries: The Philippines and South Africa, Arellano Law and Policy Review Journal, Volume 5 (2).

Tom Ginsburg. "Confucian constitutionalism? The emergence of constitutional review in Korea and Taiwan." Law & Social Inquiry 27.4 (2002).

Surkati, Achmad. "Kedudukan dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Ditinjau Dari Demokrasi Konstitusional Studi Perbandingan di Tiga Negara: Indonesia, Jerman, Thailand." Jurnal Equality 11 (2006).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. (2014)

Wicipto Setiadi, “Dukungan Politik dalam Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 2 (3), (2013)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

slot online slot gacor slot