Demanding Progressive Judges' Decisions for Fulfillment of Justice for Disputing Parties

Fence M Wantu, Irlan Puluhulawa

Abstract


Basically, judges are the main actors organizing judicial power and at the same time as guardians of justice for litigants. Judge decisions that reflect law and justice simultaneously are not easy to realize. The objectives of this study are 1). To find out and analyze the development of progressive legal teachings through judges' decisions in court. 2). To find out and analyze the teachings of progressive law through judges' decisions and their influence on justice. The research method used is normative. The approaches taken are as follows: a). statute approach. b). Conceptual approach. c). Case approach. The sources of legal materials used consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. While the analysis used in this research is descriptive technique and comparative technique. The conclusions of this research are 1). The development of progressive legal teachings through judges' decisions in court is a must and cannot be negotiated anymore. 2). That the teachings of progressive law through judges' decisions and their influence on justice to answer the demands of the times today that judges' decisions are no longer only identical to the written legal rules contained in the law as taught by positivism, but judges' decisions are as much as possible able to provide welfare for the parties to the dispute and justice seekers and society in general.


Keywords


Court; Decision; Judge; Justice; Progressive.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asrun, Andi M. “Krisis Peradilan: Mahkamah Agung Di Bawah Soeharto,” 2004.

Budhijanto, Danrivanto. “Pembentukan Hukum Yang Antisipatif Terhadap Perkembangan Zaman Dalam Dimensi Konvergensi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi.” Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 2 (2011): 243.

Faizal, Liky. “Problematika Hukum Progresif Di Indonesia.” Ijtima’iyya 9, no. 2 (2016): 22.

Farida, Any. “Teori Hukum Pancasila Sebagai Sintesa Konvergensi Teori-Teori Hukum Di Indonesia.” Perspektif 21, no. 1 (2016): 60–69.

Hornby, A S. “Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary New Edition.” Great Britain: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Huijbers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Kanisius, 1993.

Indonesia, Kamus Besar Bahasa. “Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.” Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa, 2008.

Isnantiana, Nur Iftitah. “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan.” Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 18, no. 2 (2017): 41–56.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Prenadamedia Group. Edesi Revi. Jakarta, 2016.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Liberty, 2007.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia Dan Hukum. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2007.

———. “Hukum Progresif: Hukum Yang Membebaskan.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1, no. 1 (2005): 1–24.

———. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Pub., 2009.

Sayuti. “Arah Kebijakan Pembentukan Hukum Kedepan (Pendekatan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Teori Hukum Progresif, Dan Teori Hukum Integratif).” Al-Risalah : Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 13, no. 2 (2013): 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v13i02.407.

Susanto, Anthon F. Ilmu Hukum Non Sistematik (Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia). LoGoz Publishing, 2015.

Syamsudin, M. “Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substantif Dalam Putusan Sengketa Tanah Magersari.” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1 (2014): 18–33.

Tampi, Mariske Myeke. “Menakar Progresivitas Teknologi Finansial (Fintech) Dalam Hukum Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 2 (2019): 251. https://doi.org/10.24912/erahukum.v16i2.4529.

Tegal, DFHP. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat.” J. Pembaharuan Huk 1, no. 3 (2014): 278.

Unger, Roberto M. Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis: The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Nusa Media, 2018.

Wantu, Fence M. “Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 3 (2012): 479–89.

Wantu, Fence M. “Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 19, no. 3 (2007).

———. “Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 25, no. 2 (2013): 205–18.

Wantu, Fence M, Jufryanto Puluhulawa, Anis H Bajrektarevic, Mellisa Towadi, and Vifi Swarianata. “Renewal of the Criminal Justice System Through the Constante Justitie Principle That Guarantees Justitiabelen’s Satisfaction.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 10, no. 3 (2022).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v16i1.18435

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.