When Speech Becomes Crime: Defamation and Constitutional Power After Decision 78/2023

Imam Syaifuddin, Alvi Syahrin, Marlina Marlina

Abstract


This study examines the constitutional and legal dimensions of defamation in Indonesia in light of Constitutional Court Decision No. 78/PUU-XXI/2023 and District Court Decision No. 8/Pid.B/2024/PN Wns. Using a normative juridical method combined with a qualitative case approach, it analyzes how the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of Article 310(1) of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) as a verbal act reshapes the legal framework of defamation. Relevant regulations include Articles 310–321 of the KUHP, Articles 433–439 of Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Penal Code), and Law No. 1 of 2024 (ITE Law). The findings reveal a constitutional enforcement gap: while the Constitutional Court provides a clear interpretive standard, the Watansoppeng District Court failed to apply it despite issuing a substantively appropriate sentence. This inconsistency reflects institutional weaknesses in implementing constitutional decisions within ordinary courts. To deepen the analysis, this study draws on comparative experiences from Germany and Colombia. Both jurisdictions face similar enforcement gaps but address them through structured mechanisms, such as mandatory appellate references in Germany and the tutela mechanism in Colombia. These insights show that binding constitutional authority requires institutional enforcement measures to ensure effectiveness. The novelty of this study lies in identifying this enforcement gap as a critical challenge to constitutional supremacy in criminal defamation and situating it within a comparative perspective. It contributes to legal scholarship and judicial reform discourse by emphasizing the need for systematic judicial compliance to guarantee legal certainty, protect fundamental rights, and maintain coherence in defamation law.

Keywords


Criminal Law; Defamation; Freedom of Expression; Contitutional Court Decision.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adji, Oemar Seno. “Perkembangan Delik Pers Di Indonesia.” Erlangga, 1990. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000793676749696.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006. https://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=2445&lokasi=lokal.

Boldt, Richard, and Dan Friedman. “Constitutional Incorporation: A Consideration of the Judicial Function in State and Federal Constitutional Interpretation.” Md. L. Rev. 76 (2016): 309.

Bundesverfassungsgericht. “Effect of Decisions.” Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/EN/Decisions/EffectOfDecisions/effectofdecisions_node.

Cate, Fred H., D. Annette Fields, and James K. McBain. “The Right to Privacy and the Public’s Right to Know: The Central Purpose of the Freedom of Information Act.” Administrative Law Review 46 (1994): 41.

Cepeda-Espinosa, Manuel José. “Judicial Activism in a Violent Context: The Origin, Role, and Impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court.” Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 3 (2004): 529.

CNN Indonesia. “Haris Azhar Dan Fatiah Didakwa Lakukan Pencemaran Nama Baik Luhut.” 2023. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230403103638-12-932758/haris-azhar-dan-fatiah-didakwa-lakukan-pencemaran-nama-baik-luhut.

Darmawan, Rio Suryo. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Penghapusan Larangan Penyebaran Berita Hoaxs Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah.” Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Penghapusan Larangan Penyebaran Berita Hoaxs Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah 5, no. 2 (2024): 1–16.

Delaney, Patrick. “Legislating for Equality in Colombia: Constitutional Jurisprudence, Tutelas, and Social Reform.” The Equal Rights Review 1 (2008): 50–59.

Determann, Lothar, and Markus Heintzen. “Constitutional Review of Statutes in Germany and the United States Compared.” J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y 28 (2018): 95.

Dwiyanti, Asti, Citranu Citranu, Okta Nofia Sari, et al. Pengantar Hukum Pidana: Teori, Prinsip, Dan Implementasi. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia, 2024. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=mwv0EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA65&dq=Dwinanda+L.+L.+H.+N.+Kusumawardhani,+Hukum+Pidana&ots=hIgnazOSpo&sig=77CrBgjsvrFgB_uIkIX1O925n7k.

Fiseha, Assefa. “Constitutional Adjudication and Constitutional Governance.” In Federalism, Devolution and Cleavages in Africa, edited by Assefa Fiseha. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50426-6_6.

Haryadi, Achmad Dodi, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, and Arief Hidayat. “Consistency of Constitutional Court Decisions in Realizing Fair Legal Certainty.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Policy and Sustainable Development (ICPSD 2024) 869 (2024): 229. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=NSM6EQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA229&dq=the+Court+not+only+removed+ambiguity+from+Article+310(1)+KUHP+but+also+reinforced+the+principle+of+legal+certainty,+equality+before+the+law,+and+protection+of+fundamental+rights&ots=fPceM4BJ6Z&sig=9qSzLcYwu6fUNwFepiu13nBJZlU.

Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang. “The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe–Standards and Impact.” European Journal of International Law 25, no. 2 (2014): 579–97.

Indrati, Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muata. Kanisius, 2007. https://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=9147&lokasi=lokal.

Indrayana, Denny. Negara Antara Ada Dan Tiada: Reformasi Hukum Ketatanegaraan. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2008. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=72vdFAPCnyYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Denny+Indrayana,+Negara+Antara+Ada+dan+Tiada&ots=yZ5DXMmZbm&sig=j-Lx93K_-XMRgkMlrk52XXS9d4c.

Inguanzo, Isabel, and Angélica Rodríguez Rodríguez. “Analysis of the Colombian Constitutional Court’s Transformative Approach to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence.” Social & Legal Studies 33, no. 2 (2024): 254–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639231159048.

Irwansyah, Irwansyah. “Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel.” Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media 8 (2020).

Landau, David. “Political Institutions and Judicial Role in Comparative Constitutional Law.” Harv. Int’l LJ 51 (2010): 319.

Landau, David. “Political Institutions and Judicial Role in Comparative Constitutional Law.” Harv. Int’l LJ 51 (2010): 319.

Levine, Kay L., Jonathan Remy Nash, and Robert A. Schapiro. “The Unconstitutional Conditions Vacuum in Criminal Procedure.” Yale Law Journal 133 (2024 2023): 1401.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.

Manan, Bagir. Hukum Positif Indonesia: Satu Kajian Teoritik. Fh Uii Press, 2004.

Nasir, Liana, Syamsul Rijal, and Muhamad Aksan Akbar. “Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 2 (2025): 622–38.

Nurhayati, Dwi Endah. “Sistem Pidana Denda Dalam Kebijakan Legislatif Di Indonesia.” PhD Thesis, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro, 2009. https://eprints.undip.ac.id/17169/.

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. “Human Rights, International Economic Law and ‘Constitutional Justice.’” European Journal of International Law 19, no. 4 (2008): 769–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn041.

Priambudi, Rafiki Candra. “Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut Pasal 310 KUHP Dan Pasal 27 Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang ITE.” Lex Administratum 8, no. 4 (2020). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/31048.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Refika Aditama, 1989. https://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=45836&lokasi=lokal.

Satrya, Kresna. “Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia.” LEX PRIVATUM 13, no. 5 (2024). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/57118.

Shannon, Bradley Scott. “The Retroactive and Prospective Application of Judicial Decisions.” Harv. JL & Pub. Pol’y 26 (2003): 811.

Sianturi, S. R. Tindak Pidana Di KUHP Berikut Uraiannya. Alumni AHM-PTHM, 1983.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers, 2006. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798017116160.

Soesilo, Raden. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal: Untuk Para Pejabat Kepolisian Negara, Kejaksaan/Pengadilan Negeri, Pamong Praja, Dsb. Polteia, 1974. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271588828800.

Syahird, Ahmad, Rahmad Masturi, and Muhammad Kamran. “Constitutional Court’s Limitation on the Resubmission Ofindictments.” LEGAL BRIEF 13, no. 5 (2024): 1202–14.

Tushnet, Mark. “New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights-and Democracy-Based Worries.” In Bills of Rights. Routledge, 2017. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315096339-10/new-forms-judicial-review-persistence-rights-democracy-based-worries-mark-tushnet.

Viqi, Ahmad. “KUHP Baru Berlaku 2026, Wamenkumham: Tidak Mungkin Puaskan Semua Pihak.” Accessed April 28, 2025. https://www.detik.com/bali/berita/d-6820366/kuhp-baru-berlaku-2026-wamenkumham-tidak-mungkin-puaskan-semua-pihak.

Von Bogdandy, Armin, and René Urueña. “International Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America.” American Journal of International Law 114, no. 3 (2020): 403–42.

Wahyuni, Willa. “Perubahan Penting Soal Pencemaran Nama Baik di UU ITE Baru.” hukumonline.com. Accessed April 28, 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perubahan-penting-soal-pencemaran-nama-baik-di-uu-ite-baru-lt65a90c5004886/.

Zainal, Asrianto. “Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Teknologi Informasi Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana.” Al-’Adl 9, no. 1 (2016): 57–74.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v18i2.31310

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.