Death Penalty Reform in Indonesia and Malaysia: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s New Criminal Code and Malaysian Law

Prija Djatmika, Heru Kurniawan

Abstract


Capital punishment regulation in Southeast Asia is undergoing significant transformation, particularly in jurisdictions that seek to recalibrate punitive severity while retaining capital sentencing. Indonesia and Malaysia provide two notable yet conceptually distinct models of death penalty reform that remain insufficiently examined in comparative legal scholarship. This article analyzes the reformulation of capital punishment under Indonesia’s Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code and Malaysia’s post-mandatory death penalty reforms to assess their underlying penal rationales and legal implications. Using normative juridical research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia retains capital punishment as a special principal penalty subject to a ten-year probationary mechanism, thereby embedding conditionality within its sentencing structure without eliminating the death penalty itself. In contrast, Malaysia does not reclassify capital punishment but abolishes its mandatory imposition, restoring judicial discretion to impose non-capital sentences in qualifying cases. The article argues that these reforms represent divergent trajectories of capital punishment moderation: Indonesia adopts a conditional retention model, whereas Malaysia embraces a discretionary sentencing model. This comparison demonstrates that similar reformist trends may reflect fundamentally different penal philosophies in the governance of capital punishment.

Keywords


Capital Punishment; Death Penalty Reform; Comparative Criminal Law; Judicial Discretion; Indonesia and Malaysia

References


Andriyansyah, Ahmad Fadlan, and Jamel Dalimunthe. “Vonis Pidana Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Serta Hubungannya Dengan Ham Dan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Nusantara (JIMNU) 1, no. 3 (2023): 168–72. https://doi.org/10.59435/jimnu.v1i3.182.

Anjari, Warih. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” E-Journal WIDYA Yustisia 1, no. 2 (2015): 107–15.

Budiman, Adhigama Andre, Genoveva A. K. S. Maya, Girlie L. A. Ginting, Iftitahsari Iftitahsari, Johanna G. S. D. Poerba, and Maidina Rahmawat. 2022 Report on Death Penalty in Indonesia: No One Is Protected. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2023. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EN-ICJR-Death-Penalty-Report-period-2022-No-one-is-protected.pdf.

Candrawati, Dewi Sekar, Dhiya Mukhlashi, Muhammad Ragib Isfahani, Muhammad Rizal Rahman, and Syihaabul Huda. “Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam KUHP Baru: Orientasi dan Implikasi.” Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 12 (2023): 123–30. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10428719.

Djatmika, Prija, Milda Istiqomah, and Heru Kurniawan. “Discourse on the Death Penalty: A Study of Public Perceptions in Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2024): 38–63. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.81938.

Hardiago, David, and Syafrinaldi Syafrinaldi. “Terorisme dan Pemasyarakatan: Problem Hukum Pendidikan Deradikalisasi bagi Terpidana Terorisme di Indonesia.” JKIH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2022): 146–75. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkih.v1i2.294.

Human Rights Watch. Malaysia Mencabut Perintah Hukuman Mati Wajib: Langkah yang Bermakna Harus Membuka Jalan Menuju Penghapusan Penuh. April 20, 2023. https://www.hrw.org/id/news/2023/04/20/malaysia-repeals-mandatory-death-penalty.

Imparsial: The Indonesian Human Rights Monitor. KUHP Baru dan Problematika Hukuman Mati di Indonesia. April 12, 2023. https://imparsial.org/kuhp-baru-dan-problematika-hukuman-mati-di-indonesia/.

Karmila, Karmila, Suci Arinda, Eka Putri, and Sintong Arion Hutapea. “Kontroversi Hukuman Mati Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dilihat Dari Perspektif HAM (Hak Asasi Manusia) Dan Kriminologi.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 2, no. 3 (2025): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.3851.

Kasim, Gunnar. New Death Penalty Law in Indonesia. Issue No. 1/2023. Indonesia Criminal Law Update. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2023. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ICJR_New-Death-Penalty-Law-in-Indonesia.pdf.

Kumalasanti, Susana Rita. “Pidana Mati ala Indonesia, Jalan Tengah Kaum Abolisionis dan Retensionis.” Kompas.id, July 20, 2022. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2022/05/26/pidana-mati-ala-indonesia-jalan-tengah-kaum-abolisionis-dan-retensionis?open_from=Search_Result_Page.

Lestari, Indah, Putu Riski Ananda Kusuma, Made Sugi Hartono, and Dewa Bagus Sanjaya. “Analisis Pasal 100 Undang–Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Hukuman Mati Bersyarat Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Dan Asas Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis 4, no. 3 (2024): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23887/jih.v4i3.5030.

Sadewo, Joko. “KUHP Baru Dinilai Sebagai Kompromi Pro Kontra Hukuman Mati.” Republika, April 13, 2023. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/rt0m7s318/kuhp-baru-dinilai-sebagai-kompromi-pro-kontra-hukuman-mati?

Saputra, Andi. “MK: Hukuman Mati Percobaan di KUHP Baru Belum Berlaku.” detikNews, Mei 2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6740154/mk-hukuman-mati-percobaan-di-kuhp-baru-belum-berlaku.

Sianturi, Yanti Kristina, and Irza Khurun’in. “Amnesty International dan Penghapusan Hukuman Mati di Malaysia.” Transformasi Global 7, no. 2 (2020): 235–57. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtg.2020.007.02.4.

Sipayung, Baren, Sardjana Orba Manullang, and Henry Kristian Siburian. “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2023): 134–42. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.4710.

Susanto, Mei, and Ajie Ramdan. “Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007.” Jurnal Yudisial 10, no. 2 (2017): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.138.

United Nations. On World Day against Death Penalty, Ban Says Practice “Has No Place in the 21st Century.” Oktober 2016. https://news.un.org/en/story/2016/10/542302-world-day-against-death-penalty-ban-says-practice-has-no-place-21st-century.

Zulhilmi, Daffa, and Muhamad Chaidar. “Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (2025): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v9i1.10922.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v19i1.37772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.