Legal Aspects of Business Dispute Resolution through Alternative Out-of-Court Settlements

Jusril D. Manopo; Wiranto G. Baharu

doi:10.33756/eslaj.v7i3.32439

Legal Aspects of Business Dispute Resolution through Alternative Out-of-Court Settlements

Jusril D. Manopo, Wiranto G. Baharu

Abstract

Legal aspects in business dispute resolution through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) play an essential role as they offer a more efficient, flexible, and lower-cost solution compared to litigation processes in court. Various ADR methods, such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, are governed by legal regulations aimed at ensuring fairness for all parties involved. Key legal aspects of ADR in Indonesia include the legal foundations in the Civil Code, Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, and other related regulations. Mediation and arbitration have become preferred choices for business dispute resolution due to their time and cost efficiency, as well as their ability to preserve relationships between the parties involved. However, challenges in its implementation, such as the lack of public awareness, inconsistent application of legal provisions, and limited professional capacity of mediators or arbitrators, continue to hinder the optimal utilization of ADR mechanisms. Furthermore, the enforceability of ADR outcomes particularly arbitral awards often faces procedural barriers and resistance from parties unfamiliar with non-litigation solutions. Despite these obstacles, the development of ADR in Indonesia continues to show promise, supported by judicial encouragement and increasing inclusion in contractual clauses. In conclusion, strengthening the legal framework, enhancing professional standards, and promoting ADR literacy among stakeholders are crucial steps in advancing effective business dispute resolution outside the courtroom.

Keywords

Dispute Resolution, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Arbitration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adiansah, W., Apsari, N. C., & Raharjo, S. T. (2019). Resolusi konflik agraria di Desa Genteng Kecamatan Sukasari Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20887

Anggraeny, I., Tongat, T., Lutfia, F., Ratna, A., & Rachmaudina, T. (2021). Pendampingan hukum pengusaha UMKM dalam penyelesaian sengketa kontrak bisnis. CARADDE: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.31960/caradde.v3i3.731

Arifin, I. Z., Lutfi, A. R., Huda, M. M., & Haqqi, M. (2024). Mediation as an alternative to resolving inherited disputes of congenital children: Juridical and economic perspectives. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 7(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i1.107

Aritonang, A. G. (2021). Peran alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan dalam perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. CREPIDO, 3(1), 1–12. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/article/view/11772

Baharuddin, M. Y. A. (2024). Peran hukum arbitrase dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis nasional: Hukum arbitrase. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v5i2.209

Gandotra, A. (2021). Judicial intervention in granting interim measures in international arbitration. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 38(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21301

Hamdan, Y., Ratnasari, A., & Hirzi, A. T. (2015). Kemampuan negosiasi pengusaha dalam meningkatkan kesepakatan bisnis. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 31(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v31i1.854

Hasandi, H., Haerani, H., & Aswadi, K. (2022). Efektifitas mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan (Studi di BPSK Kota Mataram). Unizar Recht Journal (URJ), 1(2). http://e-journal.unizar.ac.id/index.php/urj/article/view/660

Lahilote, H. S., & Adam, M. F. (2021). Eksistensi Basyarnas dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Al-’Aqdu: Journal of Islamic Economics Law, 1(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.30984/ajiel.v1i2.1808

Mahmudah, N. (2022). Menelusuri penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1), 34–45. https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/jiflaw/article/view/358

Martinelli, I., Bravo, A., Hasta, B. J. H., & Owen, N. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap efektivitas lembaga alternatif penyelesaian sengketa arbitrase dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan dibandingkan lembaga pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 4(3), 212–218. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/humaniora/article/view/962

Nayed, M. I. O. (2023). Standards of distinctions between national and foreign arbitral awards: A discussion in the light of Libyan current legislation. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2023.4306

Putra, R. K., Kalsum, U., Johari, Gusmarani, R., & Sony, E. (2024). Efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa secara non litigasi. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(6), 2200–2206. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i6.5548

Rakhmaniar, A. (2024). Analisis kuantitatif tentang pengaruh komunikasi verbal dan nonverbal dalam proses negosiasi bisnis. Sosial: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v2i1.251

Ramdhany, M. F. D. (2023). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan ADR. Indonesia Berdaya, 4(4), 1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023549

Rohman, B., & Rachmatulloh, M. A. (2022). Effectiveness of mediation in preventing divorce in the land of Papua. Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS), 4(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.33474/jas.v4i2.17607

Rukmono, B. S., Huda, M. M., & Suherman, B. (2023). The urgency of the principle of public policy as a basis for refusing the execution of commercial arbitration awards submitted for execution in Indonesia. Migration Letters, 20(6), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i6.3502

Sihombing, D. A., & Suyanto, H. (2021). Mediasi sebagai salah satu alternatif penyelesaian sengketa kontrak showbiz di luar pengadilan. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 8(2), 1–10. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia

Sindu, I. M. B. A., Budiarta, I. N. P., & Dinar, I. G. A. A. G. P. (2022). Azas proporsionalitas dalam kontrak bisnis franchise. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.3.5575.599-607

Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Zaini, A., & Nurjanah, N. (2021). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan global sebagai resolusi konflik sosial. Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.24269/jpk.v6.n2.2021.pp43-54

Wijaya, E. E. (2021). Penerapan konsep public policy sebagai alasan penolakan pengakuan dan eksekusi putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia dan Singapura. Jurnal Hukum Visio Justisia, 1(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.19166/vj.v1i1.3778

Wulandari, T. (2022). Resolusi konflik sengketa lahan hutan tanaman industri (HTI) di Kampung Mandiangin Kecamatan Minas Kabupaten Siak. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 3(2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v3i2.77

Yulistyaputri, R., & Lestarini, R. (2023). Consumer empowerment: Safeguarding consumer rights through BPSK’s arbitration post the Constitutional Court decision. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(3), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2033

Zakariya, H., & Suparwi, S. (2025). Mediasi komunal sebagai wujud keadilan komunal: (Transformasi dari hukum sistemik ke hukum non sistemik). Sultan Adam: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial, 3(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.71456/sultan.v3i1.1165

Zulfa, N., & Oktaviani, D. (2023). Peran negosiasi terhadap konflik. Jurnal TIPS: Jurnal Riset, Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(2), 127–131. https://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/jurnaltips/article/view/3269

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v7i3.32439