Constitutional Compliance Solution to Law Testing Rulings in the Constitutional Court
Abstract
One of the current constitutional issues in Indonesia is the non-compliance of the decision to immediately follow up the decision of the Constitutional Court, which is final. This paper aims to analyze forms of non-compliance with the decision of the Constitutional Court and create a model that is expected to be a solution to the problem. This type of research is juridical normative by using secondary data processed by editing and systematization techniques.  The results showed the form of non-compliance of the decision of the Constitutional Court by the addresat of the decision is manifested in 3 (three) forms, namely normative, praxis, and normative and praxis forms. There are three proposed state-regulation solutions, namely judicial deferral by limiting the time of action, re-affirmation of judicial restraint, collaborative action, and collective awareness between state institutions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, A., and Heryani, W. (2012). “Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukumâ€. Jakarta: Pranada Media Grup.
Anonymous. (2001). “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesiaâ€. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional dan Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, F., et.al., (2019). “Implementasi Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003-2018â€. Jakarta: Indonesian Legal Roundtable.
Asshidiqie, J. (2012). “Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasiâ€, 2nd edition. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Bachtiar. (2015). “Problematika Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Pengujian UU Terhadap UUDâ€. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya Grup.
Bisariyadi. (2015). “Yudisialisasi Politik dan Sikap Menahan Diri: Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undangâ€. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12 (3): 488.
Bisariyadi. (Ed. Februari, 2017). “Politik Penundaan Pelaksanaan Putusan Atas Nama Demokrasiâ€. Majalah Konstitusi: 74-76.
Bugaric, B. (2001). “Courts as Policy Makers: Lessons from Transitionâ€, Harvard International Law Journals. 42 (3): 256.
Chemerinsky, E. (1997). “Justice Delayed is Justice Deniedâ€. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 11 (2): 24
Huda, N. (2018). “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusiâ€. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Islamy, M.I. (2000). “Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijakan Negaraâ€. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. p. 64-65.
Limbach, J. (2001). “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitutionâ€. The Modern Law Review. 64 (1):
Mauldi, A.M. (2019). “Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusiâ€. Jurnal Konstitusi. 16 (2).
Mangunsong, P. M. (1992). â€Konvensi Ketatatnegaraan Sebagai Salah Satu Sarana Perubahan UUDâ€. Bandung: Alumni.
Nggilu, N.M. (2019). “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusiâ€. Jurnal Konstitusi. 16 (1).
Siahaan, M. (2005). “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesiaâ€, 1st Edition. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Siahaan, M. (2009). "Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitusiâ€, Jurnal Hukum. 3 (16): 359.
Sutiyoso, B. (2006). “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesiaâ€, Cetakan Pertama, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sutiyoso, B. (2011). “Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia.†Jurnal Konstitusi, 7 (6): 26.
Soeroso, F.L. (2004). "Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi", Jurnal Konstitusi. 11 (1): 77.
Soeroso, F.L., et.al., (2013). "Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 tentang SBI atau RSBI". Jurnal Konstitusi. 10 (4):
Syukri, A., Meyrind, R.H., Mohammad, M.A., (2013). “Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Study Verdict of 2003-2012)â€. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Syukri, A., Meyrind, R.H., Mohammad, M.A., (2015). “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baruâ€, Jurnal Konstitusi. 12 (3): 653.
Thaib, D. (2009). “Ketatanegaan Indonesia Perspektif Konstitusionalâ€. 1st Edition. Yogyakarta: Total Media.
Widiarto, A.E. (2015). “Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusiâ€. Jurnal Konstitusi. 12 (4): 736.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.10735
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Tri Sulistyowati, Ali Rido, M. Imam Nasef
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e4a/23e4acc4ed22c1ae51d49e8e997e015746b90c24" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS.
Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |||
Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |