Constitutional Compliance Solution to Law Testing Rulings in the Constitutional Court

Tri Sulistyowati; Ali Ridho; M Imam Nasef

doi:10.33756/jlr.v3i0.10735

Constitutional Compliance Solution to Law Testing Rulings in the Constitutional Court

Tri Sulistyowati, Ali Ridho, M Imam Nasef

Abstract

One of the current constitutional issues in Indonesia is the non-compliance of the decision to immediately follow up the decision of the Constitutional Court, which is final. This paper aims to analyze forms of non-compliance with the decision of the Constitutional Court and create a model that is expected to be a solution to the problem. This type of research is juridical normative by using secondary data processed by editing and systematization techniques. The results showed the form of non-compliance of the decision of the Constitutional Court by the addresat of the decision is manifested in 3 (three) forms, namely normative, praxis, and normative and praxis forms. There are three proposed state-regulation solutions, namely judicial deferral by limiting the time of action, re-affirmation of judicial restraint, collaborative action, and collective awareness between state institutions.

Keywords

Constitutional Court; Constitutional Compliance; Addressat Verdict

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali, A., and Heryani, W. (2012). “Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukum”. Jakarta: Pranada Media Grup.

Anonymous. (2001). “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia”. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional dan Balai Pustaka.

Arifin, F., et.al., (2019). “Implementasi Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003-2018”. Jakarta: Indonesian Legal Roundtable.

Asshidiqie, J. (2012). “Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi”, 2nd edition. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Bachtiar. (2015). “Problematika Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Pengujian UU Terhadap UUD”. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya Grup.

Bisariyadi. (2015). “Yudisialisasi Politik dan Sikap Menahan Diri: Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang”. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12 (3): 488.

Bisariyadi. (Ed. Februari, 2017). “Politik Penundaan Pelaksanaan Putusan Atas Nama Demokrasi”. Majalah Konstitusi: 74-76.

Bugaric, B. (2001). “Courts as Policy Makers: Lessons from Transition”, Harvard International Law Journals. 42 (3): 256.

Chemerinsky, E. (1997). “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 11 (2): 24

Huda, N. (2018). “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Islamy, M.I. (2000). “Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijakan Negara”. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. p. 64-65.

Limbach, J. (2001). “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”. The Modern Law Review. 64 (1):

Mauldi, A.M. (2019). “Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. 16 (2).

Mangunsong, P. M. (1992). ”Konvensi Ketatatnegaraan Sebagai Salah Satu Sarana Perubahan UUD”. Bandung: Alumni.

Nggilu, N.M. (2019). “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. 16 (1).

Siahaan, M. (2005). “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia”, 1st Edition. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Siahaan, M. (2009). "Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitusi”, Jurnal Hukum. 3 (16): 359.

Sutiyoso, B. (2006). “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia”, Cetakan Pertama, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutiyoso, B. (2011). “Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi, 7 (6): 26.

Soeroso, F.L. (2004). "Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi", Jurnal Konstitusi. 11 (1): 77.

Soeroso, F.L., et.al., (2013). "Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 tentang SBI atau RSBI". Jurnal Konstitusi. 10 (4):

Syukri, A., Meyrind, R.H., Mohammad, M.A., (2013). “Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Study Verdict of 2003-2012)”. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Syukri, A., Meyrind, R.H., Mohammad, M.A., (2015). “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru”, Jurnal Konstitusi. 12 (3): 653.

Thaib, D. (2009). “Ketatanegaan Indonesia Perspektif Konstitusional”. 1st Edition. Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Widiarto, A.E. (2015). “Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. 12 (4): 736.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.10735