The Discourse on Legal Utopia for The People with Disabilities in Order to Remove the Educational Segregation

Zamroni Abdussamad

Abstract


The right to education for persons with disabilities is still a contemporary legal issue with legal and social problems. The laws and regulations governing the right to education with disabilities are still segregated for the research objectives, namely the Pattern of analyzing the educational arrangements for persons with disabilities and the ideal arrangements for achieving equality in education for persons with disabilities in Indonesia. This research method is categorized into normative legal research types. It is based on the issues and or themes raised as research topics using a philosophical and analytical research approach that is analyzed descriptively. The study results show that the segregated polarization of education for persons with disabilities is contained in Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities and Articles 5, 15 and 32 of Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. The arrangement divides persons with disabilities into particular groups that have an impact on a homogeneous social environment. Therefore, the ideal design is educational equality, as in the United States, where people with disabilities attend regular schools. Besides that, it is necessary to have equal education for people with disabilities in the laws and regulations in Indonesia.

Keywords


Persons with Disabilities; Segregation; Education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Books

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2019). Potret Pendidikan Statistik Pendidikan Indonesia 2019. Jakarta: BPS.

Boyle, C., and Topping, K. (Eds.). What works in inclusion? Berkshire: Open University Press.

Cooper, D. (2014). Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces, Durham: Duke University Press.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2012). Panduan Pelayanan Pendidikan bagi Mahasiswa Penyandang Disabilitas di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Lawson, A. and Priestley, M. (2017). The Social Model of Disability: Questions for Law and Legal Scholarship? Routledge Handbook of Disability Law and Human Rights, eds P. Blanck and E. Flynn.

Longmore, P. (2003). Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Pusat Studi dan layanan Difabel UIN Sunan Kalijaga. (2011). Menuju Inklusi: Naskah Akademik Perda Penyandang Disabilitas Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Schotland, S. D. (2011). Disability and Disease in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction: Justice and Care Perspectives. Dissertation Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland at College Park in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Suhartono, S. (2008). Wawasan Pendidikan (Sebuah Pengantar Pendidikan). Yogyakarta: Ar Ruz Media.

Young S. P. (2011). Difference Principle. In Chatterjee D.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Dordrecht: Springer

Journal Article

Chiluba, B. C. “Barriers to Health Care for Disabled People: A Review of the Literature from Low-Income Countries”. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies (IJDS), Vol. 6(2), 2019.

Grynova, M., and Kalinichenko, I. “Trends in Inclusive Education in The USA And Canada”. Journal Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 8 (2), 2018.

Hensler, L., Mercon, J., and Vilsmaier, U. “Diverse Values and a Common Utopia: Insights from a Participatory Art-Based Plural Valuation Experience in Xalapa, Mexico”. Case Studies in the Environment, 5 (1), 2021

Herawati, N. I. “Pendidikan Inklusif”. EduHumaniora, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, Juli 2016.

Ijaz, N., and Boon, H. “Medical Pluralism and the State: Regulatory Language Requirements for Traditional Acupuncturists in English-dominant Diaspora Jurisdict”. Open April-June, 8(2), 2018.

Malloy, M. P. “Utopia and the Law and Liter A and the Law and Literature Movement”. Pac Law Rev. 1 (2016).

Rosaliza, M., and Syam, E. “Masyarakat Utopis Dan Distopis Dalam Teks the Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, Karya Ursula Le Guin”. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, Vol. 15, No. 1 Agustus Tahun 2018.

Herman, S. “Constitutional Utopianism: An Exercise in Law and Literature”. McGeorge L. Rev. 93, 2017.

Official Web

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. Segregasi. Retrieved from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/segregasi (Accessed on 10 June 2021)

Radar Jogja. Calon Siswa Ditolak Karena Difabel. Retrieved from https://radarjogja.jawapos.com/2019/07/03/calon-siswa-ditolak-karena-difabel (Accessed on 10 June 2021)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i2.11068

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Zamroni Abdussamad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)
E-mail: jamburalawreview@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension World Cat
Microsoft Academic OneSearch Scilit RSZ
ESJI EuroPub Orcid EZB

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:

Leipzig Julich Harvard Stanford