Legal Analysis of The Privacy of State-Owned Enterprises

Ahmad Fauzi

Abstract


The world's market economic system influences the management behavior of State-Owned Enterprises which has been lulled by the monopolistic system. The market economic system requires the community as the main actor and the state as the facilitator. Competition occurs in companies as well as in State-Owned Enterprises. To increase efficiency and productivity, must make changes to the management system by making structural adjustments which have been known as restructuring. The government formulates the direction of targets and policies for the management and supervision of State-Owned Enterprises Law Number 19 of 2003 concerning  State-Owned Enterprises was made to fulfill the vision of future development; create a management and supervision system based on the principles of efficiency and productivity to improve performance and value in managing and confirming the role of government institutions and the position of government representatives as shareholders or capital owners to emphasize and clarify the relationship as an operator or business actor with a government institution as a regulator; to avoid acts of exploitation outside the corporate mechanism; to lay the foundations or principles of good corporate governance (Good Corporate Governance). The aim is to regulate operations, regulate restructuring, and privatization as a tool and method in State-Owned Enterprises.


Keywords


Economic; Privacy, State-Owned Enterprises

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Atikah, I. (2020). Consumer Protection and Fintech Companies In Indonesia: Innovations And Challenges Of The Financial Services Authority. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 132-153.

Bartlett, B. (1991). " Privatization in the Developing World" By L. Gray Cowan (Book Review). The Journal of Developing Areas, 26(1), 116.

Baswir, R. (2003). Bahaya Privatisasi BUMN. Jurnal Jentera, 3.

Birdsall, N., & Nellis, J. (2003). Winners and losers: assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World development, 31(10), 1617-1633.

Boyer, B., & Meidinger, E. (1985). Privatizing regulatory enforcement: a preliminary assessment of citizen suits under federal environmental laws. Buff. L. Rev., 34, 833.

Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2016). Capital-market effects of securities regulation: Prior conditions, implementation, and enforcement. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(11), 2885-2924.

Defourny, J. (2013). Third sector. In Handbook on the economics of reciprocity and social enterprise. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Douglass, M. (2018). A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural–urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia (pp. 124-154). Routledge.

Garner, J. F., & Friedman, W. G. (1970). Government Enterprise. A Comparative Study, Stevens, London,

Harahap, Rahmat Saleh. "Relationship between the effectiveness of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) policies with the occurrence of corruption cases in the State-Owned Enterprises environment." Journal of Social Science 1.3 (2020): 78-82.

Ika, S. R., & Ghazali, N. A. M. (2012). Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal.

Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2008). EAFTA or CEPEA: Which way forward?. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 113-139.

Kay, J. A., & Thompson, D. J. (1986). Privatisation: a policy in search of a rationale. The economic journal, 96(381), 18-32.

Mardjana, L. K. (1994). Korporatisasi dan Privatisasi sebagai Alternatif Pembenahan BUMN. Jurnal Keuangan dan Moneter, Jakarta. BPEK., hal 16

O’rourke, D. (2006). Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards?. World development, 34(5), 899-918.

Oky Deviani Burhamzah, 2001, Privatisasi PT. Semen Gresik, PPs Univ. Hasanuddin.

Van de Walle, N. (1989). Privatization in developing countries: a review of the issues. World Development, 17(5), 601-615.

Law:

Undang– Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1995 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal.

Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v4i1.11959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Fauzi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)
E-mail: jamburalawreview@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension World Cat
Microsoft Academic OneSearch Scilit RSZ
ESJI EuroPub Orcid EZB

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:

Leipzig Julich Harvard Stanford