Land Bank in Indonesia: Disoriented Authority, Overlapping Regulations and Injustice

Muh Afif Mahfud; Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan; Muhammad Fahad Malik

doi:10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24166

Land Bank in Indonesia: Disoriented Authority, Overlapping Regulations and Injustice

Muh Afif Mahfud, Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan, Muhammad Fahad Malik

Abstract

The Indonesian Lank Bank Agency (“Land Bank”) is a sui generis institution that has broad authority including providing convenience for investors and implementing agrarian reform based on the value of justice and legal certainty. This paper aims to analyze the disorientation of authority and overlapping regulations of the Land Bank, examine the Land Bank’s authority based on the cybernetic concept of Talcott Parsons and deconstruct the Land Bank‘s authority in terms of the value of justice. This research is a normative study that uses secondary data collected through literature research and analyzed the data through content analysis. Based on the analysis, it is found that there is a disorientation of the Land Bank‘s authority as its authority to implement the agrarian reform aimed at creating equitable land ownership is contradictory to its authority to facilitate investments that use large areas of land. The implementation of agrarian reform by the Land Bank also faces overlapping regulations and authority. Based on Talcott Parsons' cybernetic concept, the Indonesian government prioritizes investment facilitation authority (economic subsystem) which has the highest energy and therefore ignore agrarian reform (social subsystem) which has lower energy. This is not in line with the principle of justice, namely partiality to the disadvantaged party since it prioritizes the interests of business entities as the more economically advantaged party and overrides the interests of people who do not own land or control land less than the minimum limit.

Keywords

Authority; Disorientation; Land Bank; Regulation; Talcott Parsons

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agenjo-calderón, Astrid. “The economization of life in 21st-century neoliberal capitalism : A systematic review from a feminist political economy perspective ✩.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 58 (2021): 185–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.05.009.

Asmara, Teddy. “The Effectiveness of Gratification Arrangements as Part of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia: A Theoretical Study in Talcott Parsons Perspective.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10, no. 1 (2021): 906–11. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.107.

Batubara, Bosman, Michelle Kooy, Yves Van Leynseele, Margreet Zwarteveen, dan Ari Ujianto. “Urbanization in ( post- ) New Order Indonesia : connecting unevenness in the city with that in the countryside Urbanization in ( post- ) New Order Indonesia : connecting.” The Journal of Peasent Studies 2, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.2000399.

Benedetti, Mario De. “Bruno Leoni ’ s Concept of Law and Representation in The Cyber Age : A Cybernetic Model.” Open Political Science 3, no. 1 (2020): 56–65.

Canale, Damiano, dan Giovanni Tuzet. “Legislative Intentions and Counterfactu-als: Or, What One Can Still Learn from Dworkin’s Critique of Legal Positivism.” Ratio Juris 36, no. 1 (2023): 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12368.

Chen, Jinghua. “Rawls and the Global Original Position.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 23, no. 67 (2023): 113–32. https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.23.67.6.

Djohan, Naufal Hasanuddin. “Menemukenali Efektivitas Penghapusan Perdagangan Orang dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum untuk Perempuan di Indonesia.” Progressive Law and Society 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–13.

Eddy Purnama, Ilyas Ismail, Husna Sartika. “Standard Patterns of Considerations in Law, District Regulation and Qanun Based on Legal Rules in Indonesia.” Pancasila and Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 15–30.

Emilie Filion-Donato; Marlon Miguel and Ayse Yuva, Bernardo Bianchi. Materialism & Politics. ICI Berlin Press. Vol. 11. Berlin: ICI Berlin Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-20.

Flachs, Andrew. “Charisma and agrarian crisis: Authority and legitimacy at multiple scales for rural development.” Journal of Rural Studies 88, no. September (2021): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.010.

Gibbs, Nathan. “The Foundations of Constitutional Democracy: The Kelsen-Natural Law Controversy.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 37, no. 1 (2024): 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.3.

Hayvon, John C. “Action against inequalities: a synthesis of social justice & equity, diversity, inclusion frameworks.” International Journal for Equity in Health 23, no. 1 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02141-3.

Ho, Serene, Pranab R. Choudhury, dan Richa Joshi. “Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project.” Land Use Policy 125, no. May 2022 (2023): 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106457.

Hoddy, Eric T. “Peasants’ Rights and Agrarian Violence in Transitional Settings: From Transitional Justice to Transformative Agrarian Justice.” Journal of Human Rights 20, no. 1 (2021): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1850242.

Inoue, Akira, Kazumi Shimizu, Daisuke Udagawa, dan Yoshiki Wakamatsu. Reflective equilibrium in practice and model selection: a methodological proposal from a survey experiment on the theories of distributive justice. Synthese. Vol. 203. Springer Netherlands, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04544-9.

Jenkins, Maricarmen. “Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 37, no. 1 (2024): 109–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.2.

Lowe, Jeffrey S., Natalie Prochaska, dan W. Dennis Keating. “Bringing permanent affordable housing and community control to scale: The potential of community land trust and land bank collaboration.” Cities 126, no. January 2021 (2022): 103718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103718.

Mahfud, Muh Afif. “Progressive Agrarian Law as a Concept to Attain Social Justice.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 17, no. 1 (2022): 158–66. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.34022.

Mahfud, Muh Afif, Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan, dan Muhammad Fahad Malik. “Constitutionality of Simultaneous Extension and Renewal of Land Rights.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 12, no. 1 (2024): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1360.

Maity, Shrabanti. “Rawls’ difference principle, self-help group, financial inclusion and social cohesion—lore or actuality? Experience of Central Assam.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02708-z.

Merkel, Almuth D. “The Social Market Economy as a Forumla for Peacce, Prosperity adn Sustainability.” School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding and Developmen 5, no. 1 (2021).

Oberlin Molina, Matías Nahuel. “The Anti-Imperialist Conception of the Agrarian Reform in the Work of the Jesuit Ignacio Ellacuría (1970-1979).” América Latina Hoy, 2022, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.26916.

Ormerod, Richard. “The history and ideas of sociological functionalism : Talcott Parsons , modern sociological theory , and the relevance for OR modern sociological theory , and the relevance for OR.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 0, no. 0 (2019): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590.

Papuluwa, Mahmud Umar Suwarti dan Nurlaila Kadawrati. “Analisis Ketimpangan Penguasaan dan Pemilikan Tanah Pasca Reforma Agraria di Indonesia.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 13, no. 1 (2023): 104–16.

Roestamy, Martin, Abraham Yazdi Martin, Radif Khotamir Rusli, dan Mohamad Ali Fulazzaky. “A Review of the Reliability of Land Bank Institution in Indonesia for Effective Land Management of Public Interest.” Land Use Policy 120, no. February 2020 (2022): 106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106275.

Romero, Mary. “Sociology Engaged in Social Justice.” American Sociological Review 85, no. 1 (2020): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419893677.

Samekto, FX. Adji. “Menelusuri Akar Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Stufenbeautheorie Dalam Pendekatan Normatif-Filosofis.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 1 (2019): 6. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.1-19.

Sasu, Alexander, Arshad Javed, Muhammad Imran, dan Graham Squires. “Land banking, land price and Ghana’s informal land markets: A relational complexity approach.” Land Use Policy 141, no. January (2024): 107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107133.

Satria, Adhi Putra. “Sibernetika Talcott Parsons: Suatu Analisis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Omnibus Law Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan Kerja Di Indonesia.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 2, no. 2 (2020): 111–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i2.37317.

Siregar, Ballian, Sumardjo Sumardjo, Sarwititi Sarwoprasodjo, dan Ninuk Purnaningsih. “The Role of Communication as Agrarian Conflicts Resolution (Systematic Literature Review.” Studies in Media and Communication 12, no. 2 (2024): 377. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i2.6729.

Subekti, Rahayu, Adi Sulistiyono, Diah Pawestri Maharani, dan I. Gusti Ayu Gangga Santi Dewi. “The urgency of the legal strategy of abandoned-land use through the formation of land bank in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2239050.

Tarmizi. “Legal Simplification of Land Regulation Associated with Increased Investment as the Basis for Conceptualization of the Omnibus Law.” Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 11, no. 1 (2020): 203–7. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.1(47).24.

Yolani, Ajeng, Muhammad Rafli Syamsulhadi, Nurul Aini, dan Utama Putra Sejati. “Risalah Tentang Konsep Negara Integralistik.” Forum Riset Ilmiah Kajian Masyarakat Indonesia 1, no. 2022 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx.

Yue, Wenze, Bo Hou, Guanqiong Ye, dan Zhiwen Wang. “China’s land-sea coordination practice in territorial spatial planning.” Ocean and Coastal Management 237, no. October 2022 (2023): 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106545.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24166