Restorative Justice: Finding Common Ground Between Justice and Shared Interests

Dewi Asri Yustia, Faris Fachrizal Jodi, Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan, Fareed Mohd Hassan

Abstract


In Indonesia’s current criminal justice practice, the resolution of criminal acts can be pursued through two main approaches: retributive justice, as regulated by the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and restorative justice, which has gradually been adopted through various regulations at the stages of investigation, prosecution, and adjudication. Restorative justice emphasizes restoration rather than retribution by involving the offender, the victim, their respective families, and community figures in a collaborative process to reach a fair resolution. This study aims to examine the fundamental principles of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system and to propose a conceptual framework that promotes an integrative approach to resolving criminal cases by balancing the interests of all parties. Using a normative juridical method and a qualitative approach, the study finds that restorative justice is based on the principles of restitution, reconciliation, and social reintegration. To support its effective implementation, the concept should include the strengthening of legal norms concerning victims’ rights, the authority of law enforcement institutions, and the development of a justice system that embraces restorative values. Ultimately, the application of restorative justice is expected to shape a criminal justice system that is not only repressive but also ensures a balanced consideration of the interests of victims, offenders, and society as a whole.

Keywords


Restorative justice; sistem peradilan pidana; keseimbangan kepentingan; pemulihan; ukum pidana integratif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Cet. 1. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Cet. 5. Kencana, 2018.

Attorney General’s Regulation Number 15 of 2020 Concerning the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice (2020).

Baihaky, Muhammad Rif’an, and Muridah Isnawati. “Restorative Justice: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penerapan Yang Seyogianya.” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 8, no. 2 (2024): 276–89. https://doi.org/10.31933/4mqgaj17.

Braithwaite, John. “Restorative Justice and Reintegrative Shaming.” In Criminal Justice Theory, Volume 26. Routledge, 2020.

Dasuha, Deniro Fadjar Fachriza Purba, and Budiman Sinaga. “Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora 6, no. 1 (2026): 10–10. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i1.3216.

Derlic, Dragana, Meghan Koza, and Stuti Kokkalera. “Exploring Restorative Justice Programs for Emerging Adults in the United States: A Content Analysis of Available Services.” Criminal Justice Studies 38, no. 2 (2025): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2025.2508054.

Efendi, Mukti Arif, and Linda Ikawati. “Upaya Restorative Justice Di Tingkat Penyidikan Melalui Konstruksi Diskresi Bhabinkamtibmas Studi Polres Wonosobo.” Transformasi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2023): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.59579/transformasihukum.v2i1.4664.

Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Cetakan keempat, Revisi. Refika Aditama, 2014.

Hadi, Naufal Akbar Kusuma. “Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Dilihat Dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 10, no. 2 (2022): 227–40. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i2.62834.

Huda, Mohammad Nurul. “Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia.” Voice Justisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2023): 21–35.

Idrees, Rao Qasim, and Naveed Hussain. Juvenile Justice System in Pakistan: An Analysis of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018. 4, no. 1 (2026).

Juvenile Justice System Act (2018).

Law Number 8 of 1981 Concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (1981).

Marshall, Tony F. Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 1999.

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. “Restorative Justice: What Is It and Does It Work?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, no. 1 (2007): 161–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110005.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Muladi. Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2002.

Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 Concerning the Handling of Criminal Offenses Based on Restorative Justice. (2021).

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Pub., 2009.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Cet. 8. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Rasiwan, Iwan, Miljam Khoirul Harisin, and Muhammad Yaqzhan Kalamul Haq. “The Implementation of Restorative Justice Principles in Handling Cases of Children in Conflict With the Law.” Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 02 (2025): 327–37.

Ritonga, Binsar Zaroha, and Eko Soponyono. “Pembentukan Lembaga Pelaksana Pidana Sebagai Wujud Sistem Peradilan Pidana Integral.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2023): 136–53. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.136-153.

Ryberg, Jesper. “The Philosophy of Punishment.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Punishment, 1st ed., edited by Jesper Ryberg. Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197750506.013.1.

Sentencing Act (2002).

Sliva, Shannon M., and Carolyn G. Lambert. “Restorative Justice Legislation in the American States: A Statutory Analysis of Emerging Legal Doctrine.” Journal of Policy Practice 14, no. 2 (2015): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2015.1017687.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Ed. 1. Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Sujono, Sujono, Sudarto Sudarto, and Hiskia Ady Putra. “Analisis Penerapan Restorative Justice Oleh Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dalam Bingkai Arah Pembaharuan Politik Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rectum 6, no. 3 (2024): 551–64. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v6i3.4753.

Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 Concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice (2024).

Victims’ Rights Act (2002).

Wahid, Abdul. “Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (2022): 307–21. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5793.

Wahid, Eriyantouw. Keadilan Restoratif Dan Peradilan Konvensional Dalam Hukum Pidana. Penerbit Universitas Trisakti, 2009.

Walklate, Sandra, ed. Handbook of Victims and Victimology. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712871.

Wood, William R., Masahiro Suzuki, Hennessey Hayes, and Jane Bolitho. “Roadblocks and Diverging Paths for Restorative Justice in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand.” In Comparative Restorative Justice, edited by Theo Gavrielides. Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74874-6_10.

Zehr, Howard. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books, 2002.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i1.32646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dewi Asri Yustia, Faris Fachrizal Jodi, Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan, Fareed Mohd Hassan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension