“A Juridical Review Towards The Land Rights Ownership In Mixed Marriage”

Rahmia Rachman, Erlan Ardiansyah, Sahrul Sahrul

Abstract


Mixed marriage causes a legal impact on Indonesian citizens marrying foreign citizens. They cannot have land rights since it is a part of joint property in marriage based on laws and regulations on land in Indonesia following the nationalism principles. The problem involved the guarantee of constitutional rights in land rights ownership is for the Indonesian citizens having a mixed marriage and the requirements for property/assets division agreement in a mixed marriage. This used normative legal research using the legislative approach and case approach. The legal materials consisted of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials that were then analyzed and concluded using the descriptive-qualitative method. The result was that the Indonesian citizens, having a mixed marriage with foreign citizens, had similar constitutional rights to other Indonesian citizens for land rights provided that the land was not included in joint property and proven by a marriage contract containing property/assets division. The marital property division agreement can be made at the time of or before the wedding, or during the marriage in the form of a Notarial Deed, and be legalized by a marriage registrar. For Moslems, it is registered in the Office of Religious Affairs, while for non-Moslems, it is registered in the Civil Registration Office. If the contract has been legalized, the content in the contract will bind the people who make it (husband and wife).

Keywords


Land Rights; Marriage Contract; Mixed Marriage.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Referensi

Afandi, Ali. (2004). “Hukum Waris, Hukum Keluarga, Hukum Pembuktian”. Jakarta: Renika Cipta.

Bandiyah, Irma dan Abraham Ferry Rosando. (2017). “Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Warga Negara Indonesia Yang Melaksanakan Perkawinan Campuran”. DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. XIII (25): 119

Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu. (2017). “Dilema Penegakan Hukum Putusan MK Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 (Persoalan Perkawinan Campuran Tanpa Perjanjian Kawin)”, Jurnal Notariil, I (2): 4

Damanhuri, H. A. (2007). “Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Harta Bersama”, Bandung: Mandar Maju Bandung.

Fajar, Mukti, ND dan Yulianto Achmad. (2010). “Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ghazaly, Justitia Henryanto. (2019). “Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Perkawinan Campuran”, Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, V (1): 120

Isnaeni, Moch. (2014). “Hukum Benda dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek”. Surabaya: PT.Revka Petra Media.

Kasim, Nur, Mohamad. (2020). “The Implementation of Modest And Simple Principle to Mahr as a Contribution to the Indonesian Marriage Law”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 50 (2): 540

Khairandy, Ridwan. (2003). “Itikad Baik dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak”. Jakarta: Pasca Sarjana FH-UI.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. (2010). “Hukum Perdata Indonesia”. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Prawirohamidjojo, R. Soetojo dan Marthalena Pohan. (2000). “Hukum Orang dan Keluarga”. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Purnamasari, Irma Devita. (2014). “Kiat-Kiat Cerdas, Mudah dan Bijak Memahami Masalah Hukum Waris”. Bandung. Penerbit: Mizan Pustaka.

Rusli, Nur M. Kasim, Duke A. Widagdo. (2020). “Law Enforcement on the Inheritance of Siri Married in the Judicial Verdict”, Al-Bayyinah: Jurnal of Islamic Law, Vol. 4 (2): 133

Septiawan, Aislie Anantama. (2017). “Perjanjian Perkawinan Pada Perkawinan Campuran dalam Kepemilikan Tanah di Indonesia”. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, II (1): 68.

Sitorus, Junita. (2004). “Perkawinan Campuran Dalam Hukum di Indonesia”. Jakarta: Pintu Gerbang.

Subekti. (2003). “Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata”. Jakarta: PT.Intermasa.

Subekti, R. (1990). “Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata”. Jakarta: Pradyna Paramitha.

Widanarti, Herni. (2018). “Akibat Hukum Perkawinan Campuran terhadap Harta Perkawinan (Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar No: 536/Pdt.P/2015/PN.Dps.)”, Diponegoro Law Review, II (1): 162.

Yuvens, Damian Agata. (2017). “Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015”. Jurnal Konstitusi, XIV (4): 801.

Peraturan perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Dasar Agraria.

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan selanjutnya disebut Undang-Undang Perkawinan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2006 Tentang Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia.

Peraruran Pemerintah Nomor 103 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pemilihakn Rumah Tempat Tinggal Atau Hunian Oleh Orang Asing yang Berkedudukan di Indonesia.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i1.6857

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Rahmia Rachman, Erlan Ardiansyah, Sahrul Sahrul

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


Editorial Office of Jambura Law Review:
2nd Floor Pancasila building, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jenderal Sudirman Street No.6, Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province, 96128, Indonesia
Tel. +62-812-1356-9044;  +62-822-9329-6045  (SMS/WA)
E-mail: jamburalawreview@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Powered by  Public Knowledge Project OJS.

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been indexed by:

SCOPUS SCOPUS GS GARUDA
Crossref Base Index Dimension World Cat
Microsoft Academic OneSearch Scilit RSZ
ESJI EuroPub Orcid EZB

 

Jambura Law Rev. has been available at:

Leipzig Julich Harvard Stanford
slot online slot gacor slot