Legality Aspect Of Conducting Documents Only Arbitration In Indonesia

Garuda Wiko; Fatma Muthia Kinanti

doi:10.33756/jlr.v3i2.9914

Legality Aspect Of Conducting Documents Only Arbitration In Indonesia

Garuda Wiko, Fatma Muthia Kinanti

Abstract

Documents-Only Arbitration (DOA) is a type of arbitration that is carried out entirely by written documents-only. DOA is beneficial when the burden and substance of the dispute are relatively simple and when there are obstacles to conduct a face-to-face proceeding (instance in the Covid-19 Pandemic or limitation of cost). This study examined the DOA trial method and how it is based on Law No. 30 Year1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution as the lex arbitri in Indonesia. Regulations, Rules, and Procedures from arbitration institutions, both national and international are also studied to better understand the problem. This study aimed to explain the legality of arbitration based on Documents-Only Arbitration in Indonesia. This study concluded that the conduct of DOA is very possible to be implemented in Indonesia and does not conflict with Law No. 30 Year 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Arbitration Law).

Keywords

documents-only arbitration, Law No. 30 Year 1999; arbitration procedural law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books

Abdulrrasyid, P. (2002). Arbitrase & Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Fikahati Aneska dan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia

Adolf, H. (2008). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

_________. (2014). Dasar-dasar, Prinsip & Filosofi Arbitrase. Bandung: Keni Media

Brown, H. J., Marriott, A. L., (1993). ADR Principles and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Collier, J., Lowe, V. (1999). The Settlement of Disputes in International Law. England: Oxford University Press.

Harahap, M. Y. (2014). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Hernoko, A. (2013). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana.

Johanes, G. (2011). Kajian Ilmu Hukum Tentang Kebebasan Berkontrak on Butir-Butir Pemikiran dalam Hukum, Memperngati 70 Tahun Prof. Dr. B. Arief Sidharta, S. H. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Marzuki, P. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Redern, A., Hunter, M. (1986). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. London: Sweet and Maxwell

Robinu-Sammartano, M. (2001). International Arbitration Law and Practice (3rd Edition). Netherlands: Kluwer Law International

Siburian, P. (2004). Arbitrase Online: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan secara Elektronik. Jakarta: Djambatan

Soekanto, S., Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, Jakarta

Widjaja, G. (2001). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Cet. Ke-2. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Widnyana, I. (2009). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR). Jakarta: PT. Fikahati Aneska

Thesis

Archviantyo, A. (2018). Thesis: Kekuatan Pembuktian dari Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian melalui Arbitrase Online. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.

Solikhah. (2009). Tesis: Prospek Arbitrase Online Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan ditinjau dari Hukum Bisnis. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Journal Articles

Arsic J. (1997). “International Commercial Arbitration on the Internet: Has the Future Come too Early”, Journal of International Arbitration, in Armagan Ebru Bozkurt Yuksel. (2007). “Online International Arbitration”, Ankara Law Review, 4(1)

Badiei, F. (2010). “Online Arbitration Definition and its Distinctive Features” ODR, (684): 87-93.

Barkatullah, A. (2010). “Penerapan Arbitrase Online dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Transasi E-Commerce”. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 3(17): 363-382

Brozolo, L. (2012). “Mandatory Rules and International Arbitration,” The American Review of International Arbitration, 49

Entriani, A. (2017). “Arbitrase dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia”. An-Nisbah, 3(2).

Hodges, P. (2012). “Drive for Efficiency and the Risks for Procedural Neutrality – Another Tale of the Hare and the Tortoise?”. Dispute Resolution International, 6(2)

Website

Hui, L. S. (ed. 22 July 2019). Documents-only’ Arbitration: An effective mechanism for the expeditious resolution of disputes. Retrieved from https://www.barandbench.com/columns/documents-only-arbitration-an-effective-mechanism-for-the-expeditious-resolution-of-disputes. accessed 12 October 2020

Pendell, G., Bamforth, R., and Moudgil, A. (ed. 26 March 2020). Doing Arbitration Differently: Documents-Only Arbitration during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Retrieved from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6b969224-c412-404e-858f-81d3a3f22d76. Accessed 5 July 2021

Regulation and Rules and Procedures

UNCITRAL Model Law

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. 12 Agustus 1999. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 138. Jakarta.

Consumer Arbitration Rules by American Arbitration Association, Rules Amended and Effective 1 September, 2014, Cost of Arbitration Effective 1 January, 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i2.9914