VALIDITAS SKALA UKUR NYERI VISUAL ANALOG AND NUMERIK RANTING SCALES (VANRS) TERHADAP PENILAIAN NYERI

Linda Andreyani, Wida Kuswida Bhakti

Abstract


Visual Analog and Numerik Ranting Scale (VANRS) adalah Skala nyeri yang dikebangkan oleh peneliti dengan mengabungkan Visual Analog Scale (VAS)  dan Numerik Ranting Scale (NRS). Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini karena meneliti tentang validitas skala ukur nyeri Visual Analog and Numerik Ranting Scale (VANRS) terhadap penilaian nyeri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempermudah saat melakukan anamnesa pada pasien sehingga data subjektif dan objektif didapatkan untuk menentukan kasus yang terjadi apakah emergency atau tidak, dapat dipergunakan pada berbagai macam kasus atau diagnosis baik itu bayi atau pediatrik, anak, dewasa dan geriatri dalam keadaan sadar maupun yang mengalami penurunan kesadaran. Metode penelitian yaitu dengan menggunakan Stiker Emoticon Skala Nyeri yang diberi rentang nilai dengan warna dan angka kemudian stiker tersebut di tempelkan ke spuit 10 cc kemudian dilakukan uji coba secara langsung terhadap 45 partisipan dengan mengidentifikasi secara langsung respon nyeri partisipan dengan menggunakan alat yang di dikembangkan oleh peneliti yaitu VANRS kemudian dilakukan olah data dengan menggunakan SPSS 25 untuk validasi data. Penelitian ini telah mendapatkan persetujuan Komite Etik dan Hukum dengan Nomor : 400.7.4.2/0249/RSUD-B. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya korelasi yang kuat antara VAS dan NRS nyeri dengan uji korelasi Spearmans (rho=0,937 P<0,001). Kesimpulan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara tool nyeri dalam subkelompok yaitu antara VAS dan NRS sehingga tool nyeri yang dibuat bisa dipergunakan sebagai media untuk melakukan pengkajian.

Keywords


Skala ukur nyeri; VAS; NRS.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jensen MP, Tomé-Pires C, de la Vega R, Galán S, Solé E, Miró J. What Determines Whether a Pain is Rated as Mild, Moderate, or Severe? The Importance of Pain Beliefs and Pain Interference. Clin J Pain [Internet]. 2017 May;33(5):414–21. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00002508-201705000-00004

Vitani RAI. Tinjauan Literatur: Alat Ukur Nyeri Untuk Pasien Dewasa Literature Review: Pain Assessment Tool To Adults Patients. J Manaj Asuhan Keperawatan [Internet]. 2019 Jan 20;3(1):1–7. Available from: http://jurnal.akper-whs.ac.id/index.php/mak/article/view/51

Demir Doğan M. The effect of reiki on pain: A Meta-Analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract [Internet]. 2018 May;31:384–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1744388117303626

Thong ISK, Jensen MP, Miró J, Tan G. The Validity Of Pain Intensity Measures: What Do The NRS, VAS, VRS, And FPS-R Measure? Scand J Pain [Internet]. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99–107. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012/html

Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A Systematic Review Of The Pain Scales In Adults: Which To Use? Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2018 Apr;36(4):707–14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735675718300081

Sung Y-T, Wu J-S. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A New Technique for Psychological Measurement. Behav Res Methods [Internet]. 2018 Aug 17;50(4):1694–715. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8

Govas P, Ketchum A, Kazi R, Gordon BR, Carroll BT. Pain Intensity Assessment Scales for Dermatologic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review. Dermatologic Surg [Internet]. 2022 Feb;48(2):232–8. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/DSS.0000000000003353

Alghadir A, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal Z. Test & Ndash; Retest Reliability, Validity, And Minimum Detectable Change Of Visual Analog, Numerical Rating, And Verbal Rating Scales For Measurement Of Osteoarthritic Knee Pain. J Pain Res [Internet]. 2018 Apr;Volume 11:851–6. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/test-retest-reliability-validity-and-minimum-detectable-change-of-visu-peer-reviewed-article-JPR

Falzone E, Hoffmann C, Keita H. Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients. Drugs Aging [Internet]. 2013 Feb 4;30(2):81–90. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40266-012-0047-7

Bonati LM, Quatrano NA, Sadeghpour M, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Setting Appropriate Pain Expectations: Lessons Learned From A Clinical Trial. Lasers Surg Med [Internet]. 2019 Apr 30;51(4):318–20. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23029

Cho S, Kim YJ, Lee M, Woo JH, Lee HJ. Cut-Off Points Between Pain Intensities Of The Postoperative Pain Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves. BMC Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2021 Dec 25;21(1):29. Available from: https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-021-01245-5

Shafshak TS, Elnemr R. The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain. JCR J Clin Rheumatol [Internet]. 2021 Oct;27(7):282–5. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/RHU.0000000000001320

Kollltveit J, Osaland M, Reimers M, Berle M. A Comparison Of Pain Registration By Visual Analog Scale And Numeric Rating Scale – A Cross-Sectional Study Of Primary Triage Registration. Prepr Serv Heal Sci. 2020;

Birnie KA, Hundert AS, Lalloo C, Nguyen C, Stinson JN. Recommendations For Selection Of Self-Report Pain Intensity Measures In Children And Adolescents: A Systematic Review And Quality Assessment Of Measurement Properties. Pain [Internet]. 2019 Jan 22;160(1):5–18. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00006396-201901000-00002

Schweizer L, Sieber R, Nickel CH, Minotti B. Ability Of Pain Scoring Scales To Differentiate Between Patients Desiring Analgesia And Those Who Do Not In The Emergency Department. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2022 Jul;57:107–13. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735675722002765




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35971/jjhsr.v5i2.19140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Licence
 

 

Jambura Journal of Health Sciences and Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

</p