Analisis Performa Klaster Single Board Computer dalam Implementasi Singular Value Decomposition

Syahrul Azka; Muhaza Liebenlito; Taufik Edy Sutanto

doi:10.37905/euler.v13i3.33367

Analisis Performa Klaster Single Board Computer dalam Implementasi Singular Value Decomposition

Syahrul Azka, Muhaza Liebenlito, Taufik Edy Sutanto

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of Singular Value Decomposition operations based on the divide-and-conquer method on two computing cluster architectures: an Intel Core i5-12400-based PC cluster and an Allwinner H618-based Orange Pi Zero 3 Single Board Computer cluster. The evaluation focuses on three key metrics: execution time, speedup, and energy consumption. Experiments were conducted on three matrix sizes (2160×2160, 3240×3240, and 5400×5400) with processor cores ranging from 1 to 12. Energy consumption was measured using a wattmeter by recording peak power during execution. The results show that the PC cluster achieves faster execution times but exhibits limited parallel scalability, reaching a maximum speedup of 10.31× and energy consumption of 2.07 Wh for the 5400×5400 matrix with 12 cores. In contrast, the SBC cluster demonstrates significantly higher parallel efficiency, achieving a speedup of 117.75× with energy consumption of only 0.23 Wh under the same configuration. These findings indicate that the SBC cluster offers a promising energy-efficient, cost-effective solution for parallel numerical computing, particularly for sustainable computing infrastructure in higher education, in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals 7.

Keywords

Computational Mathematics; Parallel Computing; Single Board Computer; Sustainable Computing; Singular Value Decomposition

Full Text:

PDF

References

Y. I. Alzoubi and A. Mishra, “Green artificial intelligence initiatives: Potentials and challenges,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 468, 8 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143090.

J. Cowls, A. Tsamados, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi, “The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations,” AI and Society, vol. 38, pp. 283–307, 2 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x.

L. H. Kaack, P. L. Donti, E. Strubell, G. Kamiya, F. Creutzig, and D. Rolnick, “Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 12, pp. 518–527, 6 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7.

T. Spencer and S. Singh, “Energy and AI: World Energy Outlook Special Report,” International Energy Agency, Tech. Rep., 2025, [Online]. Available: www.iea.org/terms

[Accessed: 2-June-2025].

P. Li, J. Yang, M. A. Islam, and S. Ren, “Making AI less ‘thirsty’: Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models,” Communications of the ACM, 4 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.03271.

U. N. D. of Economic and S. Affairs, “The 17 goals | sustainable development,” [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7

[Accessed: 5-May-2025].

J. Ariza and H. Baez, “Understanding the role of single-board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature review,” pp. 304–329, 1 2021, doi: 10.1002/cae.22439.

P. Liu, X. Cao, and Y. Jia, “Performance evaluation and analysis of scalable Raspberry Pi 4 Model B clusters,” 6 2024, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4460804/v1.

P. J. Basford, S. J. Johnston, C. S. Perkins, T. Garnock-Jones, F. P. Tso, D. Pezaros, R. D. Mullins, E. Yoneki, J. Singer, and S. J. Cox, “Performance analysis of single board computer clusters,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 102, pp. 278–291, 1 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.040.

P. Dubey and A. Kagdi, “Run time analysis of matrix multiplication using Raspberry Pi cluster supercomputer,” Tech. Rep., 2020, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22065.20324/1.

A. N. Fauzie, S. P. Sakti, and Rahmadwati, “Parallel implementation of Gaussian filter image processing on a cluster of single board computer,” Jurnal EECCIS (Electrics, Electronics, Communications, Controls, Informatics, Systems), vol. 17, pp. 82–88, 12 2023, doi: 10.21776/jeeccis.v17i3.1672.

T. Widiyaningtyas, M. I. Ardiansyah, and T. B. Adji, “Recommendation Algorithm Using SVD and Weight Point Rank (SVD-WPR),” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/bdcc6040121.

L. Wang and H. Ji, “A Watermarking Optimization Method Based on Matrix Decomposition and DWT for Multi-Size Images,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11132027.

A. Falini, “A review on the selection criteria for the truncated SVD in Data Science applications,” Journal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science, vol. 5, p. 100064, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jcmds.2022.100064.

D. Liu, R. Li, D. J. Lilja, and W. Xiao, “A divide-and-conquer approach for solving singular value decomposition on a heterogeneous system,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers. ACM, 2013, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1145/2482767.2482811.

L. C. Moleong, A. M. Rumagit, and B. A. Sugiarso, “Implementasi cluster computing untuk render animasi,” e-Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer, vol. 2, pp. 1–8, 2013, doi: 10.35793/jtek.v2i3.2109.

H. Li, T. Liu, X. Wu, and Q. Chen, “A bearing fault diagnosis method based on enhanced singular value decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, pp. 3220–3230, 5 2021, doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3001376.

M. Gu and S. C. Eisenstat, “A divide-and-conquer algorithm for the bidiagonal SVD,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 16, pp. 79–92, 12 1992, doi: 10.1137/S0895479893255124.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/euler.v13i3.33367