Implementasi Design Research dalam Pembelajaran Analisis Riil yang Terkoneksi dengan Matematika Sekolah

Khamida Siti Nur Atiqoh; M Hafiz

doi:10.37905/euler.v13i3.35095

Implementasi Design Research dalam Pembelajaran Analisis Riil yang Terkoneksi dengan Matematika Sekolah

Khamida Siti Nur Atiqoh, M Hafiz

Abstract

This study aims to describe a learning trajectory for the topics of sequences and its limits in Real Analysis that connects abstract mathematical concepts with school mathematics. The research employed a Design Research approach consisting of three stages: preliminary design, design experiment (including pilot and teaching experiments), and retrospective analysis. The participants were 30 fifth-semester students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Data were collected through student worksheets, classroom observations, and interviews, and were analyzed qualitatively by comparing the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) with the actual learning trajectory that emerged during instruction. The results indicate that the developed trajectory effectively supported students in understanding the concepts of real number sequences, convergent and divergent sequences, and limits through a gradual process from intuitive to formal understanding. Revisions to the worksheets and HLT in the second phase also improved students’ ability to generalize patterns and build mathematical connections. This study contributes to the development of a relevant Local Instruction Theory (LIT) for Real Analysis instruction in mathematics teacher education and offers an alternative instructional design that bridges the gap between school mathematics and advanced mathematics.

Keywords

Design Research; Learning trajectory; Connection; Real Analysis; School mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References

E. Murray, E. Baldinger, N. Wasserman, S. Broderick, and D. White, “Connecting Advanced and Secondary Mathematics,” IUMPST: The Journal, vol. 1, 2017, [Online]. Available: www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu]

G. J. Stylianides, A. J. Stylianides, and A. Moutsios-Rentzos, “Proof and proving in school and university mathematics education research: a systematic review,” ZDM – Mathematics Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 47–59, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y.

N. H. Wasserman and W. McGuffey, “Opportunities to Learn From (Advanced) Mathematical Coursework: A Teacher Perspective on Observed Classroom Practice,” J Res Math Educ, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 370–406, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc-2019-0017.

E. G. Arnold, E. A. Burroughs, E. W. Fulton, and J. A. M. Álvarez, “Applications of Teaching Secondary Mathematics in Undergraduate Mathematics Courses,” Feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04537.

P. Di Martino, F. Gregorio, and P. Iannone, “The transition from school to university mathematics in different contexts: affective and sociocultural issues in students’ crisis,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 79–106, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10649-022-10179-9.

A. G. Aksoy, “Fundamentals of Real and Complex Analysis,” Springer, 2024, pp. 127–275. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54831-4_2.

M. Anagha and A. Bade, “Real & Complex Analysis,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Impact Factor, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 707–711, 2025, doi: 10.17148/IJARCCE.2025.144101.

M. Wahyuni, “Analisis Problematika Perkuliahan Analisis Real,” Journal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 135–149, 2017.

R. G. Bartle and D. R. Sherbert, Introduction to Real Analysis.

N. Wasserman, K. Weber, M. Villanueva, and J. P. Mejia-Ramos, “Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis,” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 74–89, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.004.

K. S. N. Atiqoh and M. Hafiz, “Koneksi Analisis Riil dan Matematika Sekolah: Identifikasi pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika,” Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 140–152, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.34312/euler.v10i2.16233.

N. H. Wasserman, T. Fukawa-Connelly, K. Weber, J. P. Mejía Ramos, and S. Abbott, Understanding Analysis and its Connections to Secondary Mathematics Teaching. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-89198-5.

E. A. Sari, K. Hadiprasetyo, and A. A. Wulandari, “Learning difficulties of mathematic students on real analysis courses with an online system,” Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–11, May 2021, doi: 10.29407/jmen.v7i1.14766.

B. R. Takaendengan, A. Anwar, W. Takaendengan, and P. E. Kobandaha, “Identifikasi Kesalahan Jawaban Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Real Berdasarkan Newmann’s Error Analysis,” Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 235–243, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.34312/euler.v10i2.16777.

K. Gravemeijer and D. van Eerde, “Design Research as a Means for Building a Knowledge Base for Teachers and Teaching in Mathematics Education,” Elem Sch J, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 510–524, May 2009, doi: 10.1086/596999.

R. C. I. Prahmana, Design Research (Teori dan Implementasinya: Suatu Pengantar). Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.

J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, “Introducing educational design research,” in Educational Design Research, Routledge, 2006, pp. 15–19. doi: 10.4324/9780203088364-9.

K. Gravemeijer, “Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education,” Math Think Learn, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–128, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3.

W. Widjaja, “Local Instruction Theory on Decimal: The Case of Indonesian Pre-service Teachers,” 2008.

R. C. I. Prahmana, Design Research (Teori dan Implementasinya: Suatu Pengantar). Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

Y. E. Setiawan, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menggeneralisasi Pola Linier,” JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), vol. 4, no. 2, p. 180, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.33603/jnpm.v4i2.3386.

G. Amintoko, S. Saraswati, and N. D. Rahmawati, “Hambatan Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Limit Barisan serta Pemberian Scaffolding,” Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 134–144, 2017.

N. H. Wasserman, T. Fukawa-Connelly, M. Villanueva, J. P. Mejia-Ramos, and K. Weber, “Making Real Analysis Relevant to Secondary Teachers: Building Up from and Stepping Down to Practice,” PRIMUS, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 559–578, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2016.1225874.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/euler.v13i3.35095