The Death Penalty In The Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP): What Are The Regulations And Mechanisms?
Abstract
This article aims to explain the discussion of the death penalty in the draft criminal code (RKUHP) with a review from the point of regulation and mechanism of its application. This research uses a normative juridical approach method to facilitate step by step in describing the discussion. After research, it can be concluded that the RKUHP regulates the death penalty as a special punishment which is always threatened alternatively with other types of punishment, namely life imprisonment or a maximum of 20 (twenty) years in prison. In addition, crimes are regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other special laws. When referring to the purpose of punishment described in the RKUHP, there is a distinction between the goal to be achieved and the method used. Some of the objectives of sentencing are not achieved by applying the death penalty. The use of the death penalty cannot contribute to the socialization of convicts and the settlement of conflicts caused by criminal acts. Considering that imprisonment as an alternative to death penalty has a negative impact on convicts, it is necessary to develop other alternatives. This alternative not only fulfills the purpose of punishment stipulated in the KUHP, but also becomes an alternative that is not detrimental to the convict.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, H Zainuddin. Sosiologi Hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Anugrah, Roby, and Raja Desril. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021).
Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru),” 2011.
Asmarawati, Tina. “Hukuman Mati Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia.” Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2013.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017.
Barda Nawawi Arief, S H. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Prenada Media, 2018.
Beirne, Piers. “On Gabriel Tarde, Penal Philosophy.” In Classic Writings in Law and Society, 21–29. Routledge, 2017.
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo, Erasmus A T Napitupulu, Ajeng Gandini Kamilah, Antyo Rentjoko, and Lisensi Hak Cipta. Hukuman Mati Dalam R KUHP: Jalan Tengah Yang Meragukan. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2015.
Effendi, Joanedi, and Johny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Hidayat, Arif, and Zaenal Arifin. “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019).
Ismail, Faisal. Dinamika Kerukunan Antarumat Beragama: Konflik, Rekonsiliasi, Dan Harmoni. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
Jeremiah, Keren Shallom, and Karina Hasiyanni Manurung. “ANALISIS PERBUATAN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH APARAT KEPOLISIAN DALAM PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA.” Jurnal Esensi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2022).
Lubis, Teguh Syuhada. “Reformulasi Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Di Lingkungan Pendidikan Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Profesi Guru.” De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021).
Ludiana, Tia. “Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Kajian Terhadap Pidana Mati Dalam RUU KUHP).” LITIGASI 21, no. 1 (2020).
Manan, Bagir. “Politik Perundang-Undangan.” Penataran Dosen FH/STH PTS Se-Indonesia. Bogor: Makalah, 1993.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edited by PRENADAMEDIA GROUP. Edesi Revi. Jakarta, 2016.
Munawar, Said Agil Husain Al, and Abdul Halim. “Fikih Hubungan Antar Agama.” Cet. III, 2005.
Olivia, Gina. “PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MATI BERDASARKAN KUHP DAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN INDONESIA DAN CHINA.” VARIA HUKUM 3, no. 1 (2021).
Rusydi, Ibnu, and Siti Zolehah. “Makna Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama Dalam Konteks Keislaman Dan Keindonesian.” Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 2018.
Smith, Tobias, and Daniel Pascoe. “Suspended Execution beyond China’s Borders.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 9, no. 1 (2022).
Susanto, Mei, and Ajie Ramdan. “Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati.” Jurnal Yudisial 10, no. 2 (2017).
Syaukani, Imam. “Kompilasi Kebijakan Dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Kerukunan Umat Beragama.” Jakarta: Puslitbang, 2008.
Thio, Li-ann. “Rule of Law, Religious Liberty, and Harmony: Multiculturalism, Legal Pluralism, and the Singapore Model of Accommodative Secularism.” Journal of Law, Religion and State 5, no. 3 (2017).
Widayati, Lidya Suryani. “Pidana Mati Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Perlukah Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?(Death Penalty In The Bill Of Criminal Code: Should Regulated As A Special Punishment?).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 7, no. 2 (2017).
Wiyono, Puguh. “Hukuman Mati Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Kemenkumham Sulawesi Selatan, 2022. https://sulsel.kemenkumham.go.id/attachments/article/8014/hukuman mati dalam Rancangan KUHP.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v16i1.19473
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.