The Death Penalty In The Draft Criminal Code (Rkuhp): What Are The Regulations And Mechanisms?
Abstract
This article examines the death penalty provisions in the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP), focusing on its regulation and application mechanisms. Using a normative juridical approach, the study provides a detailed analysis of the draft's stance on the death penalty. The RKUHP treats the death penalty as a special punishment, which can be alternatively imposed with life imprisonment or a maximum of 20 years in prison for crimes outlined in the Criminal Code and other specific laws. The research identifies a key issue: while the RKUHP aims to achieve various goals through punishment, the death penalty fails to meet some of these objectives, such as the social rehabilitation of convicts and the resolution of conflicts arising from criminal acts. The study suggests that imprisonment as an alternative to the death penalty has negative effects on convicts and proposes exploring other punitive alternatives. These alternatives should align with the goals of justice and rehabilitation outlined in the criminal law, offering solutions that do not harm the convict’s prospects. This research highlights the need for a more effective and humane approach to punishment in the criminal justice system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, H Zainuddin. Sosiologi Hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Anugrah, Roby, and Raja Desril. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021).
Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana:(Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru),” 2011.
Asmarawati, Tina. “Hukuman Mati Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia.” Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2013.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017.
Barda Nawawi Arief, S H. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Prenada Media, 2018.
Beirne, Piers. “On Gabriel Tarde, Penal Philosophy.” In Classic Writings in Law and Society, 21–29. Routledge, 2017.
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo, Erasmus A T Napitupulu, Ajeng Gandini Kamilah, Antyo Rentjoko, and Lisensi Hak Cipta. Hukuman Mati Dalam R KUHP: Jalan Tengah Yang Meragukan. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2015.
Effendi, Joanedi, and Johny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Hidayat, Arif, and Zaenal Arifin. “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019).
Ismail, Faisal. Dinamika Kerukunan Antarumat Beragama: Konflik, Rekonsiliasi, Dan Harmoni. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
Jeremiah, Keren Shallom, and Karina Hasiyanni Manurung. “ANALISIS PERBUATAN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH APARAT KEPOLISIAN DALAM PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA.” Jurnal Esensi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2022).
Lubis, Teguh Syuhada. “Reformulasi Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Di Lingkungan Pendidikan Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Profesi Guru.” De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021).
Ludiana, Tia. “Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Kajian Terhadap Pidana Mati Dalam RUU KUHP).” LITIGASI 21, no. 1 (2020).
Manan, Bagir. “Politik Perundang-Undangan.” Penataran Dosen FH/STH PTS Se-Indonesia. Bogor: Makalah, 1993.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edited by PRENADAMEDIA GROUP. Edesi Revi. Jakarta, 2016.
Munawar, Said Agil Husain Al, and Abdul Halim. “Fikih Hubungan Antar Agama.” Cet. III, 2005.
Olivia, Gina. “PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MATI BERDASARKAN KUHP DAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN INDONESIA DAN CHINA.” VARIA HUKUM 3, no. 1 (2021).
Rusydi, Ibnu, and Siti Zolehah. “Makna Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama Dalam Konteks Keislaman Dan Keindonesian.” Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 2018.
Smith, Tobias, and Daniel Pascoe. “Suspended Execution beyond China’s Borders.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 9, no. 1 (2022).
Susanto, Mei, and Ajie Ramdan. “Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati.” Jurnal Yudisial 10, no. 2 (2017).
Syaukani, Imam. “Kompilasi Kebijakan Dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Kerukunan Umat Beragama.” Jakarta: Puslitbang, 2008.
Thio, Li-ann. “Rule of Law, Religious Liberty, and Harmony: Multiculturalism, Legal Pluralism, and the Singapore Model of Accommodative Secularism.” Journal of Law, Religion and State 5, no. 3 (2017).
Widayati, Lidya Suryani. “Pidana Mati Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Perlukah Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?(Death Penalty In The Bill Of Criminal Code: Should Regulated As A Special Punishment?).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 7, no. 2 (2017).
Wiyono, Puguh. “Hukuman Mati Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Kemenkumham Sulawesi Selatan, 2022. https://sulsel.kemenkumham.go.id/attachments/article/8014/hukuman mati dalam Rancangan KUHP.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v16i1.19473
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.