Ideal Regulatory Model for Forming Presidential Regulation on Fictitious Positive Decisions after Job Creation Law

Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa, Zamroni Abdussamad, Erman I. Rahim

Abstract


This study examines the normative construction of fictitious positive decisions following the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 on Job Creation and proposes an ideal regulatory model for the mandated Presidential Regulation. The Job Creation Law fundamentally altered the fictitious positive mechanism by shortening the response period, abolishing judicial resolution through the State Administrative Court, and delegating essential regulatory details to a Presidential Regulation. However, the absence of this regulation has created a legal vacuum, producing a dualistic landscape in which administrative silence may be construed either as approval under the Government Administration Law or as rejection under the State Administrative Court Law. This ambiguity undermines legal certainty and the protection of citizens’ rights. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes the deficiencies of the current framework and formulates a comprehensive model for the Presidential Regulation. The proposed model addresses six critical dimensions: the form and legal status of fictitious positive decisions; a confirmation procedure for applicants; robust oversight by the Ombudsman and internal supervisory bodies; residual judicial protection; progressive digitalization through the Online Single Submission system; and periodic evaluation. The study concludes that enacting the Presidential Regulation is not merely a statutory obligation but a constitutional imperative to reconcile the legislative choice to administrativize fictitious positive resolution with the principles of legal certainty, access to justice, and protection against administrative inaction. The model offers a coherent framework for restoring legitimacy and effectiveness to a mechanism currently rendered ineffective by prolonged regulatory inaction.

Keywords


Fictitious Positive Decisions; Administrative Silence; Legal Certainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Redesign of Positive Fictitious Efforts After the Job Creation Law.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (June 2023): 340–57. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2029.

Ahmad, Ahmad. “Konsep Fiktif Positif: Penerapannya Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 5, no. 2 (September 2017): 141–56. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v5i2.923.

Akmal, Aria Nur, Nur Maelasari, and Lusiana Lusiana. “Pemahaman Deep Learning Dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Literatur Melalui Metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR).” JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 8, no. 3 (2025): 3229–36.

Allison, John W. F. “Current Legal Fictions in Public Law.” Current Legal Problems 77, no. 1 (November 2024): 413–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuae013.

Arniti, Ni Komang Ayu, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Penyelesaian Permohonan Fiktif Positif untuk Mendapatkan Keputusan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 2 (2019): 265–70. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.1.2.2019.265-270.

Aschari, M., and Francisca Romana Harjiyatni. “Kajian Tentang Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum 2, no. 1 (May 2017): 25–57.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Teori Hierarki Norma Hukum.” Jakarta: Konstitusi Press Bekerja Sama Dengan JSLG, 2020.

Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Ombudsman Dan Di Pengadilan Mengenai Ganti Kerugian Dalam Pelayanan Publik.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 2, no. 2 (2019): 213–34.

Buonsu, I. Gede, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Keputusan Fiktif Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Gugatan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 2021): 68–72.

Cahyandari, Dewi. “The Good Governance Principle in Fictitious-Positive Case Applications After the Job Creation Law.” Yustisia 12, no. 1 (April 2023): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i1.63999.

Efendi, Aan, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, Ahmad Suhaimi, Suwardi Suwardi, and Lucky Dafira Nugroho. “Administrative Silence in Indonesia: Negative or Positive Legal Fiction? Keheningan Administratif Di Indonesia: Fiktif Negatif Atau Fiktif Positif?” Jurnal Konstitusi 23, no. 2 (June 2026): 262–79. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2323.

Fahmi, Muhammad Yusril Izzal. “Implikasi yuridis pasal 175 poin 7 undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2023 terhadap kewenangan PTUN memutus permohonan fiktif positif.” Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2023. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/53423/.

Fauziah, Arina Manasikana. “Authorities of Village Heads in Removing and/or Transitioning Letter c Perspectives Siyasah Dusturiyah (Study of Article 26 of Law Number 6 of 2014 Concerning Villages).” Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2023. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/51652/.

Hadita, Cynthia. “RECONSTRUCTION OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF APPLICATIONS POSITIVE FICTION ( Analysis Critical Post The Birth Constitution Number 6 of 2023 Concerning Determination Regulation Government Replacement Constitution Number 2 of 2022 Concerning Create Work ).” NOMOI Law Review 5, no. 2 (November 2024): 175–85. https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v5i2.21521.

Haryadi, Haryadi, Muhammad Syafei, and Muhammad Rafi Darajati. “Reform Types of Legislation Regulations in Indonesia: Reformulasi Jenis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Journal of Constitutional Law Society 1, no. 2 (September 2022): 217–23. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i2.35.

LAYANG, I. WAYAN BELA SIKI. “Kendala Dan Cara Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca UU Administrasi Pemerintahan: Suatu Pendekatan Atas Penanganan Perkara Fiktif Positif.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2021.

Norra, Azza Azka. “Pertentangan Norma Fiktif Negatif Dan Fiktif Positif Serta Kontekstualisasinya Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 3, no. 2 (2020): 141–54.

Nurhayati, Nunik, Giftian Fajri Rustyono, Achmad Miftah Farid, and Rohmad Suryadi. “Legal Certainty of The Positive Fictive Policy In Business Licensing Through The Online Single Submission Risk-Based Approach System In Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 10, no. 2 (June 2025): 224–41. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i2.12009.

Pamungkas, Regy, Tri Mulyani, and Amri Panahatan Sihotang. “Perluasan Kompetensi Ptun Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Semarang Law Review (SLR) 5, no. 2 (October 2024): 104–22. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v5i2.10089.

Pertiwi, Adinda Putri, Adrian E. Rompis, and R. Adi Nurzaman. “The Elimination of State Administrative Court’s Authority to Decide Positive Fictitious Decisions After the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2014 Connected with the General Principles of Good Governance.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 5, no. 1 (November 2023): 107–24. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v5i1.1390.

Rahayu, Olivia Septi, Carissa Azzahra Setiyaputri, Indah Surya Lestari, and Chinta Amalia Tri Hapsari. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menolak Suatu Gugatan Berdasarkan Kompetensi Relatif: (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 18/G/2018/PTUN.DPS).” Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 1 (January 2026): 499–506. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.3094.

Ramdani, Farid. “Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9, no. 2 (2018): 142–50.

Said, Muhtar, and Erfandi Erfandi. “Tafsir Hakim Judex Facti Dan Judex Juris Terkait Batas Maksimal Upaya Administratif.” Progresif: Jurnal Hukum 17, no. 1 (2023): 1–23.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Perkara Fiktif Positif Dan Permasalahan Hukumnya.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (November 2017): 379–98. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.379-398.

———. “Prospek Prinsip Fiktif Positif Dalam Menunjang Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 7, no. 2 (August 2018): 301–20. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i2.250.

Sulaiman, Mohammad Farouq. “Modifikasi Teknis Yudisial Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif Sebagai Implikasi Berlakunya OMNIBUSLAW Cipta Kerja.” Widya Yuridika 8, no. 1 (March 2025): 177–94.

Utama, Kartika Widya. “Surat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 141–251. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v8i2.10259.

Wulandari, Desy. “Pengujian Keputusan Fiktif Positif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (November 2020): 32–56. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v19i2.41794

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.