Penggunaan ChatGPT Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Sebuah Tinjauan Fraud Pentagon

Rahmad Wahyu Hidayat, Khresna Bayu Sangka

Abstract


This inquire about points to decide the impact of the extortion pentagon, specifically weight, opportunity, rationalization, capacity, and pomposity on scholarly extortion and the utilize of ChatGPT is able to direct the impact of the extortion pentagon, to be specific weight, opportunity, rationalization, capacity, and self-importance on scholarly extortion. This investigate employments quantitative strategies with a graphic approach. The populace in this think about were 40,707 understudies. The inspecting strategy utilized Nonprobability Examining with Purposive Examining with a test of 387 understudies and information collection strategies utilizing surveys. The legitimacy test employments Pearson relationship item minute and the unwavering quality test employments Cronbach Alpha. The investigate information examination strategy employments clear insights, numerous direct relapse examination, Directed Relapse Examination, t test, and the coefficient of assurance. The results of the following research explain that arrogance and pressure have no effect on academic fraud. However, rationalization, opportunity, ability have an influence on academic fraud. The intensity of using ChatGPT can moderate the influence of the fraud pentagon of opportunity, pressure, ability, rationalization, and arrogance on academic fraud.


Keywords


Fraud Pentagon, ChatGPT, Kecurangan Akademik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmada, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2020). Detection of Academic Dishonesty: A Perspective of the Fraud Pentagon Model. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, 13(12), 266–282. www.ijicc.net

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Alfian, N., & Rahayu, R. P. (2021). Pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap perilaku…. AKTIVA Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 6(1), 60–75.

Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Hamdan, A., Al-Dmour, A., & Ensour, W. (2023). Factors affecting accounting students’ misuse of chatgpt: an application of the fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2023-0182

Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2020). Academic Dishonesty in Indonesian College Students: an Investigation from a Moral Psychology Perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09352-2

Anindi, D. S., Purwantini, A. H., & Maharani, B. (2022). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Investigasi Dimensi Fraud Pentagon, Integritas dan Religiusitas. Prosiding SEMINAR NASIONAL & CALL FOR PAPER, 19, 308–325. http://jurnal.untidar.ac.id

Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2023). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4

Arfiana, M., & Sholikhah, N. (2021). Fraud Diamond Dan Literasi Ekonomi Sebagai Determinan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1623–1637. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i4.658

Djaelani, Y., Zainuddin, & Mokoginta, R. M. (2022). Academic fraud of students in the Covid-19 period: Testing with the Pentagon’s fraud dimension. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science , 11(2), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1640

Febriana, N. R. (2020). Analisis pengaruh dimensi fraud pentagon terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pada uji kompetensi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 8(1), 1–22.

Fransiska, I. S., & Utami, H. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(2), 316–323.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Kurniawati, A., & Arif, A. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dan Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Informasi terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Perguruan Tinggi di Jakarta). Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(1), 1669–1678. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i1.16167

Liu, X., & Alias, N. (2023). An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 17(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-11-2021-0081

Marks, J. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough. 1–55. www.crowehorwath.com

Mcgee, R. W. (2023). Is Chat GPT Biased against Conservatives? An Empirical Study. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4359405

Nugroho, I. S. (2023). Integritas Akademik dan Religiusitas Problematika Pendidikan di Era Society 5.0. www.primeidentityhouse.com

Nurcahyono, N., & Hanum, A. N. (2023). Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior: The Perspective of the Pentagon Fraud Theory. Proceedings of the 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_18

Oktarina, D. (2021). Analisis Perspektif Fraud Pentagon pada Terjadinya Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. EKONIKA : Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri, 6(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v6i2.1450

Pratama, R. D., Sangka, K. B., & Nugroho, J. A. (2023). The Influence of Fraud Diamond Perspective and Artificial Intelligence Factors on Academic Dishonesty Indonesian College Student. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(11), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i11.5248

Pratiwi, F. F., & Putra, A. (2023). JACFA Journal Advancement Center for Finance and Accounting Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik Pada Sistem Pembelajaran Daring. Journal Advancement Center for Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 22–36. http://journal.jacfa.id/index.php

Sasongko, N., Hasyim, M. N., & Fernandez, D. (2019). Analysis of behavioral factors that cause student academic fraud. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(3), 830–837. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.53.830.837

Sipayung, Y. A., & Aprila, N. (2024). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Crowe Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(4), 1803–1817. https://doi.org/10.47476/reslaj.v6i4.1103

Ternes, M., Babin, C., Woodworth, A., & Stephens, S. (2019). Academic misconduct: An examination of its association with the dark triad and antisocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.031

Utami, D. P. W., & Purnamasari, D. I. (2021). The impact of ethics and fraud pentagon theory on academic fraud behavior. Journal of Business and Information Systems, 3(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i1.88

Wahyuni, S., Susilaningsih, & Susanti, A. D. (2021). Hubungan antara tekanan akademik, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, dan kemampuan individu dengan perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi se-Solo raya. Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 161–171.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. 74(12), 38–42. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs

Yadava, O. P. (2023). ChatGPT—a foe or an ally? Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 39(3), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01507-6

Yovanka, S., & Sugiarti, Y. (2024). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Preventing Academic Fraud during Online Learning in the COVID-19 Period. Perspektif Akuntansi, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.24246/persi.v7i1.p58-78

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–12). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712

Yulianto, A., Dahriyanto, L. F., Wijayanti, R., & Adininggar, P. (2020). The Effect of Fraud Pentagon and Academic Procrastination Dimensions Towards Academic Dishonesty of Students of Social Science in Senior High School of Semarang. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 464, 1158–1169.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37479/jeej.v7i3.27613

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmad Wahyu Hidayat, Khresna Bayu Sangka

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Jambura Economic Education Journal has been indexed:


PUBLISHED BY :

Prodi Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi

Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia

 

 
Jambura Economic Education Journal (E-ISSN: 2656-4378)(P-ISSN: 2655-5689) by program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.